Skip to main content
Log in

Sex ratio adjustment and maternal condition in two aphid species

  • Originial Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyzed how offspring sex ratio varies with maternal condition in order to obtain evidence on the population structure in two aphid species with different life cycles. When fitness returns per unit investment differ for the production of daughters and sons, selection will favor an increasing investment into the sex with the higher returns. Therefore, the offspring sex ratios of individual mothers should become more biased towards the sex with the higher fitness returns as their condition or fecundity improves. The pattern of sex ratio adjustment we found in Uroleucon cirsii indicates local mate competition among males, while the pattern we found in Rhopalosiphum padi suggests local resource competition among sexual females. This might be the first evidence for local resource competition among females in an invertebrate species. Local mate competition means that fitness returns are limited by the availability of females as mates within local breeding groups, whereas local resource competition means that fitness returns are limited by the availability of resources for females competing within local groups. We discuss how the life cycles of both species fit to these hypotheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3a, b

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The current usage of the term local resource competition is ambiguous. As used here or by Clark (1978) and Charnov (1982), local resource competition entails kin competition among related females. This predicts an increasing proportion of sons with improving maternal condition, as does the model by Trivers and Willard (1973). In another usage (for example Silk 1983), however, local resource competition is combined with cooperation among related females as through inheriting social ranks or other forms of kin cooperation. This would predict an increasing proportion of daughters with improving maternal condition, as do models of local mate competition (e.g., Yamaguchi 1985; Stubblefield and Seger 1990). Here, we consider only local resource competition among females without kin cooperation.

References

  • Bradshaw CJA, Harcourt RG, Davis LS (2003) Male-biased sex ratios in New Zealand fur zeal pups relative to environmental variation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:297–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1982) The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

  • Clark AB (1978) Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science 201:163–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagg JL (2002) Strategies of sexual reproduction in aphids. Dissertation. University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany (http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/diss/2002/dagg/dagg.pdf)

  • Debout G, Fauvergue X, Fleury F (2002) The effect of foundress number on ratio under partial local mate competition. Ecol Entomol 27:242–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittus WPJ (1998) Birth sex ratios in toque macaques and other mammals: integrating the effects of maternal condition and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44:149-160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon AFG (1998) Aphid ecology. Chapman & Hall, London

  • Dixon AFG, Glen DM (1971) Morph determination in the bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi L. Ann Appl Biol 68:11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellowes MDE, Compton SG, Cook JM (1999) Sex allocation and local mate competition in Old World non-pollinating fig wasps. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher DO (1999) Offspring sex ratio variation in the bridled nailtail wallaby, Onychogalea fraenata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank SA (1985) Hierarchical selection theory and sex ratios. II. On applying the theory, and a test with fig wasps. Evolution 39:949–964

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank SA (1990) Sex allocation theory for birds and mammals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:13–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hales DF, Wellings PW, Parkes RA (1989) Investment in gynoparae and males by Myzus persicae (Sulzer). Funct Ecol 3:727–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477–488

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy ICW (1994) Sex ratio and mating structure in the parasitoid Hymenoptera. Oikos 69:3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Herre EA (1985) Sex ratio adjustment in fig wasps. Science 228:896–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewison AJ, Andersen R, Gaillard J_M, Linnell JDC, Delorme D (1999) Contradictory findings in studies of sex ratio variation in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindlmann P, Dixon AFG (1989) Role of population density in determining the sex ratios of species that show local mate competition, with aphids as a model group. Funct Ecol 3:311–314

    Google Scholar 

  • King BH (2002) Sex ratio response to conspecifics in a parasitoid wasp: test of a prediction of local mate competition theory and alternative hypotheses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck RF, Janssen JAM, Pinto ER, Oatman ER (2001) Precise sex allocation, local mate competition, and sex ratio shifts in the parasitoid wasp Trichogramma pretiosum. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:311–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May RM, Seger J (1985) Sex ratios in wasps and aphids. Nature 318:408–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton C, Dixon AFG (1987) Cost of sex in aphids: size of males at birth and the primary sex ratio in Sitobion avenae (F.). Funct Ecol 1:321–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunn CL, Pereira ME (2000) Group histories and offspring sex ratios in ringtailed lemurs (Lemur catta). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:18–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rispe C, Bonhomme J, Simon J-C (1999) Extreme life-cycle and sex ratio variation among sexually produced clones of the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi (Homoptera: Aphididae). Oikos 86:254–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Silk JB (1983) Local resource competition and facultative adjustment of sex ratios in relation to competitive abilities. Am Nat 121:56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubblefield JW, Seger J (1990) Local mate competition with variable fecundity: dependence of offspring sex ratios on information utilization and mode of male production. Behav Ecol 1:68–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179:90–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward SA, Wellings PW (1994) Deadlines and delays as factors in aphid sex allocation. Eur J Entomol 91:29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • West SA, Herre EA (1998) Partial local mate competition and the sex ratio: a study on non-pollinating fig wasps. J Evol Biol 11:531–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West SA, Sheldon BC (2002) Constraints in the evolution of sex ratio adjustment. Science 295:1685–1688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West SA, Reece SE, Sheldon BC (2002) Sex ratios. Heredity 88:117–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi Y (1985) Sex ratios of an aphid subject to local mate competition with variable maternal condition. Nature 318:460–462

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Claude Rispe, Tony Dixon, Sebastian Domhof, Thomas Hoffmeister, Lars Reimer, and especially Stuart West for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim L. Dagg.

Additional information

Communicated by D. Gwynne

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dagg, J.L., Vidal, S. Sex ratio adjustment and maternal condition in two aphid species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55, 231–235 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0702-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0702-4

Keywords

Navigation