Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Robotic-assisted versus standard unicompartmental knee arthroplasty—evaluation of manuscript conflict of interests, funding, scientific quality and bibliometrics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has gained popularity over the last decade claiming enhanced surgical precision and better joint kinematics, with peer-reviewed publications about this new technology also increasing over the past few years. The purpose of our study was to compare manuscripts about robotic-assisted UKA to those about standard UKA in terms of industry funding, author conflict of interest, scientific quality, and bibliometrics.

Methods

A systematic search using PRISMA guidelines on PubMed and Google Scholar from 2012 to 2016 resulted in 45 papers where robotic technology was performed for UKA and 167 papers that UKA were performed without the assistance of a robot. Between the two groups, we compared (1) rate of manuscripts with reported conflict of interest or industry funding, (2) journal impact factor, (3) level of evidence, and (4) relative citation ratio.

Results

Fifty-one percent (23/45) of robotic UKA manuscripts were industry-funded or had authors with financial conflict of interest, compared to 29% ([49/167], p < 0.01) of non-robotic UKA papers. Significantly more robotic UKA papers (24% [11/45] vs 9% [16/167), p < 0.01) were published in journals that were not assigned an impact factor by the Journal Citations Report. There was no difference in regard to bibliometrics or level of evidence.

Conclusion

Manuscripts in which UKA was performed with the assistance of a robot were more likely to be industry funded or be written by authors with financial conflicts of interest and published in less prestigious journals. There were no differences in scientific quality or influence between the two groups. Readers analyzing published data should be aware of the potential conflicts of interests in order to more accurately interpret manuscripts data and conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacofsky DJ, Allen M (2016) Robotics in arthroplasty: a comprehensive review. J Arthroplast 31:2353–2363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lonner JH, Moretti VM (2016) The evolution of image-free robotic assistance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 45:249–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Herry Y, Batailler C, Lording T et al (2017) Improved joint-line restitution in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a robotic-assisted surgical technique. Int Orthop 41:2265–2271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3633-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bell SW, Anthony I, Jones B et al (2016) Improved accuracy of component positioning with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: data from a prospective, randomized controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:627–635. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.00664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg BA, Scarlat MM (2017) No free lunch in orthopedics. Int Orthop 41:1963–1964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3642-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Foughty Z, Antalis MS, Ringenberg J, Hall AD (2017) Funding sources and financial disclosures, and their relationship to study outcomes and level of evidence in the journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26:e193–e197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Marx RG, Wilson SM, Swiontkowski MF (2014) Updating the assignment of levels of evidence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:1–2. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.01112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Okike K, Kocher MS, Mehlman CT, Bhandari M (2007) Conflict of interest in orthopaedic research. An association between findings and funding in scientific presentations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:608–613. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman LS, Richter ED (2004) Relationship between conflicts of interest and research results. J Gen Intern Med 19:51–56

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fischgrund JS (2012) Conflict of interest in orthopaedic journals. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20:263–264. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-20-05-263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Scheschuk JP, Mostello AJ, Lombardi NJ et al (2016) Levels of evidence in orthopaedic trauma literature. J Orthop Trauma 30:362–366. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zaidi R, Abbassian A, Cro S et al (2012) Levels of evidence in foot and ankle surgery literature: progress from 2000 to 2010? J Bone Joint Surg Am e112(1–10):94. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stringer MJ, Sales-Pardo M, Nunes Amaral LA (2008) Effectiveness of journal ranking schemes as a tool for locating information. PLoS One 3:e1683. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001683.s005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hutchins BI, Yuan X, Anderson JM, Santangelo GM (2016) Relative citation ratio (RCR): a new metric that uses citation rates to measure influence at the article level. PLoS Biol 14:e1002541. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002541

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Greenwood DC (2007) Reliability of journal impact factor rankings. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:48–53. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-48

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lavoie F, Al-Shakfa F, Moore JR et al (2018) Postoperative stiffening after bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 31:453–458. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Turktas U, Piskin A, Poehling GG (2016) Short-term outcomes of robotically assisted patello-femoral arthroplasty. Int Orthop 40:919–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2786-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee H-J, Park Y-B, Song M-K et al (2018) Comparison of the outcomes of navigation-assisted revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty versus navigation-assisted primary TKA. Int Orthop 25:799–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4028-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T (2005) Single-incision anterior approach for Total hip Arthroplasty on an Orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000194309.70518.cb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jefferson Health System/3B Orthopaedic Clinic, 601 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA, 19106, USA

    Leonardo Cavinatto

  2. Mount Sinai Health System, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA

    Michael J. Bronson, Darwin D. Chen & Calin S. Moucha

Authors
  1. Leonardo Cavinatto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael J. Bronson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Darwin D. Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Calin S. Moucha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo Cavinatto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Cavinatto has nothing to disclose.

Dr. Bronson reports being member of the editorial board of the Journal of Arthroplasty and board member of the Arthritis Foundation.

Dr. Chen reports personal fees from Monogram Orthopedics, outside the submitted work.

Dr. Moucha reports personal fees from 3 M, personal fees from Biocomposites, outside the submitted work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cavinatto, L., Bronson, M.J., Chen, D.D. et al. Robotic-assisted versus standard unicompartmental knee arthroplasty—evaluation of manuscript conflict of interests, funding, scientific quality and bibliometrics. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 43, 1865–1871 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4175-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4175-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation