Abstract
Robotic-assisted surgical systems hold promise in enhancing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes and patients’ quality of life. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the literature on robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (r-TKA), providing insights into its current development, clinical application, and research trends. A systematic search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) to identify relevant articles. Data were collected from the top 100 highly cited articles. Article evidence levels were assessed following established guidelines. Statistical analyses and visualizations were performed to reveal publication trends, citations, research hotspots, and collaborative networks. The analysis covered 100 highly cited articles meeting the research criteria, with a focus on the last five years. The United States emerged as a major contributor, with most publications and citations in the Journal of Knee Surgery and Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy. Research priorities revolved around clinical outcomes, accuracy, and alignment of r-TKA. Notably, higher evidence levels correlated with more citations, indicating greater attention. Interest in and research on r-TKA is steadily increasing, with a few countries at the forefront of these endeavors. While numerous studies have already reported short- to medium-term follow-up results, it is crucial to conduct longer-term investigations to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the clinical benefits that r-TKA offers compared to conventional techniques. Through ongoing research and a greater embrace of robotic technology, we can continue to improve the quality of life for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Meng T, Antony B, Venn A, Eckstein F, Cicuttini F, March L, Cross M, Dwyer T, Blizzard L, Jones G, Laslett LL, Ding C (2020) Association of body composition, physical activity and physical performance with knee cartilage thickness and bone area in young adults. Rheumatol (Oxf) 59:1607–1616. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez498
Singh JA, Yu S, Chen L, Cleveland JD (2019) Rates of total joint replacement in the United States: future projections to 2020–2040 using the national inpatient sample. J Rheumatol 46:1134–1140. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.170990
Zhang JJY, Chen JY, Tay DKJ, Pang HN, Yeo SJ, Liow MHL (2023) Cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a markov decision analysis. J Arthroplasty 38:1434–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.02.022
Helvie PF, Deckard ER, Meneghini RM (2023) Cementless total knee arthroplasty over the past decade: excellent survivorship in contemporary designs. J Arthroplasty 38:S145-s150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.02.009
Park HJ, Bae TS, Kang SB, Baek HH, Chang MJ, Chang CB (2021) A three-dimensional finite element analysis on the effects of implant materials and designs on periprosthetic tibial bone resorption. PLoS ONE 16:e0246866. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246866
Lan RH, Bell JW, Samuel LT, Kamath AF (2020) Evolving outcome measures in total knee arthroplasty: trends and utilization rates over the past 15 years. J Arthroplasty 35:3375–3382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.036
Batailler C, Swan J, Sappey Marinier E, Servien E, Lustig S (2020) New technologies in knee arthroplasty: current concepts. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10010047
Hamilton KR, Hughes AJ, Campbell CM, Owens MA, Pester BD, Meints SM, Taylor JL, Edwards RR, Haythornthwaite JA, Smith MT (2023) Perioperative insomnia trajectories and functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002977
Antonios JK, Korber S, Sivasundaram L, Mayfield C, Kang HP, Oakes DA, Heckmann ND (2019) Trends in computer navigation and robotic assistance for total knee arthroplasty in the United States: an analysis of patient and hospital factors. Arthroplasty Today 5:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2019.01.002
Duan X, Zhao Y, Zhang J, Kong N, Cao R, Guan H, Li Y, Wang K, Yang P, Tian R (2023) Learning curve and short-term clinical outcomes of a new seven-axis robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty system: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res 18:425. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03899-y
Wan X, Su Q, Wang D, Yuan M, Lai Y, Xu H, Zhou Z (2021) Robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves preoperative planning and intraoperative decision-making. J Orthop Surg Res 16:670. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02815-6
Kort N, Stirling P, Pilot P, Müller JH (2022) Robot-assisted knee arthroplasty improves component positioning and alignment, but results are inconclusive on whether it improves clinical scores or reduces complications and revisions: a systematic overview of meta-analyses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 30:2639–2653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06472-4
Choi BS, Kim SE, Yang M, Ro DH, Han HS (2023) Functional alignment with robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated better patient-reported outcomes than mechanical alignment with manual total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 31:1072–1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07227-5
Heinz T, Eidmann A, Anderson P, Weißenberger M, Jakuscheit A, Rudert M, Stratos I (2023) Trends in computer-assisted surgery for total knee arthroplasty in Germany: an analysis based on the operative procedure classification system between 2010 to 2021. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020549
Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A:1–3. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200301000-00001
van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84:523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Aria M, Cuccurullo C (2017) bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr 11:959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Boese CK, Ebohon S, Ries C, De Faoite D (2021) Bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review of clinical outcomes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141:293–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03622-0
Lawrie L, Gillies K, Duncan E, Davies L, Beard D, Campbell MK (2022) Barriers and enablers to the effective implementation of robotic assisted surgery. PLoS ONE 17:e0273696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273696
Keggi JM, Wakelin EA, Koenig JA, Lawrence JM, Randall AL, Ponder CE, DeClaire JH, Shalhoub S, Lyman S, Plaskos C (2021) Impact of intra-operative predictive ligament balance on post-operative balance and patient outcome in TKA: a prospective multicenter study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141:2165–2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04043-3
Smith AF, Eccles CJ, Bhimani SJ, Denehy KM, Bhimani RB, Smith LS, Malkani AL (2021) Improved patient satisfaction following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 34:730–738. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700837
Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS (2018) Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 100B:930–937. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.100b7.Bjj-2017-1449.R1
Vaidya NV, Deshpande AN, Panjwani T, Patil R, Jaysingani T, Patil P (2022) Robotic-assisted TKA leads to a better prosthesis alignment and a better joint line restoration as compared to conventional TKA: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30:621–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06353-2
Hampp EL, Chughtai M, Scholl LY, Sodhi N, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Jacofsky DJ, Mont MA (2019) Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated greater accuracy and precision to plan compared with manual techniques. J Knee Surg 32:239–250. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1641729
Naziri Q, Cusson BC, Chaudhri M, Shah NV, Sastry A (2019) Making the transition from traditional to robotic-arm assisted TKA: What to expect? A single-surgeon comparative-analysis of the first-40 consecutive cases. J Orthop 16:364–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2019.03.010
Rajan PV, Khlopas A, Klika A, Molloy R, Krebs V, Piuzzi NS (2022) The cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus manual total knee arthroplasty: a markov model-based evaluation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 30:168–176. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00309
Moloney R, Coffey A, Coffey JC, Brien BO (2023) Nurses’ perceptions and experiences of robotic assisted surgery (RAS): an integrative review. Nurse Educ Pract 71:103724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103724
Hickey MD, Masri BA, Hodgson AJ (2023) Can technology assistance be cost effective in TKA? A simulation-based analysis of a risk-prioritized, practice-specific framework. Clin Orthop Relat Res 481:157–173. https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000002375
Lawrie L, Gillies K, Davies L, Torkington J, McGrath J, Kerr R, Immanuel A, Campbell M, Beard D (2022) Current issues and future considerations for the wider implementation of robotic-assisted surgery: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 12:e067427. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067427
Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Jung WB, Park HW, Lee GW (2011) Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1069–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1400-9
Zhang JR, Ndou WS, Ng N, Gaston P, Simpson PM, Macpherson GJ, Patton JT, Clement ND (2022) Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30:2677–2695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06464-4
Tompkins GS, Sypher KS, Li HF, Griffin TM, Duwelius PJ (2022) Robotic versus manual total knee arthroplasty in high volume surgeons: a comparison of cost and quality metrics. J Arthroplast 37:S782–S789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.12.018
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82202672), the Key Research and Development Program of Anhui Province (No. 2022e07020017), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant (2022M723049), the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province(2108085QH319), Anhui Provincial Research Preparation Plan (2022AH040074), the Joint Fund for Medical Artificial Intelligence (MAI2022C002) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK9110000173).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZX, ZC, ZJ and ZW conceived the idea for this study. YY, WY, CY, and WJ carried out the data extraction. The statistical analysis was performed by YY. Image plotting was conducted by YY, LB, WY and ZW. YY, WY and ZX drafted the initial manuscript, while all co-authors provided critical feedback and revisions to the final version. ZX and ZJ provided financial support, and ZC and ZJ provided administrative assistance. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any conflicts to report.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, Y. et al. Tracing the evolution of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 highly cited articles. J Robotic Surg 17, 2973–2985 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01742-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01742-4