Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Locking plates versus intramedullary nails in the management of displaced proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the clinical outcome and complications of locking plates versus intramedullary nails in patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures. Our hypothesis was that there would be no difference between these two implants with regard to clinical outcome and complications.

Methods

We performed a systemic review of PubMed, EMBASE, Clinical Trials Registry, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar to identify all relevant randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective comparative studies on April 26, 2017. The studies of locking plates compared to intramedullary nails in patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures were included. We conducted a meta-analysis of shoulder functional scores, range of motion, pain scores, and complications.

Results

This meta-analysis included 13 comparative studies with 958 patients (529 in the locking plate group and 429 in the intramedullary nail group). A significantly greater external rotation (MD = 9.67; 95% CI, 4.22–15.12; P = 0.0005) and a significantly higher penetration rate (RR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.11–2.77; P = 0.02) were observed in the locking plate group compared with the intramedullary nail group. Constant-Murley scores, DASH scores and total complication rate were comparable between the two groups. Moreover, there were no significant differences in forward elevation, VAS scores, and other complications.

Conclusions

Current evidence indicates that locking plates and intramedullary nails have similar performance in terms of the functional scores and total complication rate. No superior treatment was suggested between locking plates and intramedullary nails for displaced proximal humeral fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hak DJ, Mauffrey C, Hake M, Hammerberg EM, Stahel PF (2015) Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures: current diagnostic and treatment strategies. Orthopedics 38(4):247–251. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20150402-05

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Euler SA, Hengg C, Wambacher M, Spiegl UJ, Kralinger F (2015) Allogenic bone grafting for augmentation in two-part proximal humeral fracture fixation in a high-risk patient population. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(1):79–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2128-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM (2001) The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 72(4):365–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164701753542023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Launonen AP, Lepola V, Flinkkila T, Strandberg N, Ojanpera J, Rissanen P, Malmivaara A, Mattila VM, Elo P, Viljakka T, Laitinen M (2012) Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:167. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-167

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Li Y, Zhao L, Zhu L, Li J, Chen A (2013) Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced 3-part or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 8(9):e75464. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Duralde XA, Leddy LR (2010) The results of ORIF of displaced unstable proximal humeral fractures using a locking plate. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(4):480–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.08.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun JC, Li YL, Ning GZ, Wu Q, Feng SQ (2013) Treatment of three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures with locking proximal humerus plate. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23(6):699–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1040-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sudkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P, Voigt C, Oestern H, Kaab M, Luo C, Plecko M, Wendt K, Kostler W, Konrad G (2009) Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91(6):1320–1328. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.h.00006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brunner F, Sommer C, Bahrs C, Heuwinkel R, Hafner C, Rillmann P, Kohut G, Ekelund A, Muller M, Audige L, Babst R (2009) Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: a prospective multicenter analysis. J Orthop Trauma 23(3):163–172. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181920e5b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thanasas C, Kontakis G, Angoules A, Limb D, Giannoudis P (2009) Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(6):837–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.06.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ban I, Birkelund L, Palm H, Brix M, Troelsen A (2012) Circumferential wires as a supplement to intramedullary nailing in unstable trochanteric hip fractures: 4 reoperations in 60 patients followed for 1 year. Acta Orthop 83(3):240–243. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.665329

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fuchtmeier B, May R, Hente R, Maghsudi M, Volk M, Hammer J, Nerlich M, Prantl L (2007) Proximal humerus fractures: a comparative biomechanical analysis of intra and extramedullary implants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(6):441–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0319-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maier D, Jaeger M, Izadpanah K, Strohm PC, Suedkamp NP (2014) Proximal humeral fracture treatment in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(3):251–261. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.l.01293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang G, Mao Z, Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhao Y, Yin P, Gao L, Tang P, Kang H (2015) Meta-analysis of locking plate versus intramedullary nail for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Orthop Surg Res 10:122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0242-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smejkal K, Lochman P, Dedek T, Trlica J, Koci J, Zvak I (2011) Surgical treatment for proximal humerus fracture. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cechoslov 78(4):321–327

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu Y, Lu Y, Shen J, Zhang J, Jiang C (2011) Locking intramedullary nails and locking plates in the treatment of two-part proximal humeral surgical neck fractures: a prospective randomized trial with a minimum of three years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(2):159–168. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gracitelli ME, Malavolta EA, Assuncao JH, Kojima KE, dos Reis PR, Silva JS, Ferreira Neto AA, Hernandez AJ (2016) Locking intramedullary nails compared with locking plates for two- and three-part proximal humeral surgical neck fractures: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25(5):695–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gradl G, Dietze A, Kääb M, Hopfenmüller W, Mittlmeier T (2009) Is locking nailing of humeral head fractures superior to locking plate fixation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(11):2986–2993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0916-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Konrad G, Audigé L, Lambert S, Hertel R, Südkamp NP (2012) Similar outcomes for nail versus plate fixation of three-part proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(2):602–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2056-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Trepat AD, Popescu D, Fernández-Valencia JA, Cuñé J, Rios M, Prat S (2012) Comparative study between locking plates versus proximal humeral nail for the treatment of 2-part proximal humeral fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 22(5):373–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-011-0852-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Matziolis D, Kaeaeb M, Zandi SS, Perka C, Greiner S (2010) Surgical treatment of two-part fractures of the proximal humerus: comparison of fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis and Zifko nails. Injury 41(10):1041–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.04.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lekic N, Montero NM, Takemoto RC, Davidovitch RI, Egol KA (2012) Treatment of two-part proximal humerus fractures: intramedullary nail compared to locked plating. HSS J 8(2):86–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-012-9274-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Urda A, Gonzalez A, Colino A, Lopiz Y, Garcia-Fernandez C, Marco F (2012) Management of displaced surgical neck fractures of the humerus: health related quality of life, functional and radiographic results. Injury 43(Suppl 2):S12–S19. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1383(13)70174-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boudard G, Pomares G, Milin L, Lemonnier I, Coudane H, Mainard D, Delagoutte JP (2014) Locking plate fixation versus antegrade nailing of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in patients without osteoporosis. Comparative retrospective study of 63 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100(8):917–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.09.021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tamimi I, Montesa G, Collado F, González D, Carnero P, Rojas F, Nagib M, Pérez V, Álvarez M, Tamimi F (2015) Displaced proximal humeral fractures: when is surgery necessary? Injury 46(10):1921–1929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. von Ruden C, Trapp O, Hierholzer C, Prohaska S, Wurm S, Buhren V (2015) Intramedullary nailing vs. locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal humeral fractures: long-term outcome. Unfallchirurg 118(8):686–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-013-2530-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gadea F, Favard L, Boileau P, Cuny C, d’Ollone T, Saragaglia D, Sirveaux F (2017) Fixation of 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus: can we identify radiological criteria that support locking plates or IM nailing? Comparative, retrospective study of 107 cases. Orthop Traumatol: Surg Res 102(8):963–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.09.015

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hauschild O, Konrad G, Audige L, de Boer P, Lambert SM, Hertel R, Sudkamp NP (2013) Operative versus non-operative treatment for two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(10):1385–1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1798-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S, Saving J, Tidermark J (2011) Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20(5):747–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.12.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, Faber KJ (2008) Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. J Shoulder Elb Surg 17(1):42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Burkhart KJ, Dietz SO, Bastian L, Thelen U, Hoffmann R, Muller LP (2013) The treatment of proximal humeral fracture in adults. Dtsch Arztebl Int 110(35–36):591–597. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2013.0591

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M, Jazrawi LM, Tejwani NC, Zuckerman JD (2008) Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma 22(3):159–164. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318169ef2a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Owsley KC, Gorczyca JT (2008) Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures [corrected]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(2):233–240. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.f.01351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schliemann B, Wahnert D, Theisen C, Herbort M, Kosters C, Raschke MJ, Weimann A (2015) How to enhance the stability of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures? An overview of current biomechanical and clinical data. Injury 46(7):1207–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.04.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Renlong Li and Hengda Hu (all from the Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, China) for helpful discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaohua Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 113 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 100 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Q., Ge, W., Li, G. et al. Locking plates versus intramedullary nails in the management of displaced proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 42, 641–650 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3683-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3683-z

Keywords

Navigation