Skip to main content
Log in

Population-based epidemiology and incidence of distal femur fractures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The literature lacks recent epidemiological studies on the incidence, trauma mechanism and fracture classification of distal femur fractures. The aim of the present study was to provide up-to-date information concerning the incidence of distal femur fractures in a large and complete population and to report on the distribution of fracture classification, trauma mechanisms and patient baseline demographics.

Methods

The approach for this study was via a retrospective reviews of records.

Results

A total of 293 patients were treated for 302 distal femur fractures between 2005 and 2010. The mean age at the time of fracture was 62.2 years. The mean age was 44.0 years for males and 71.6 years for females. The gender distribution was 33.4% males and 66.6% females. The overall incidence of distal femur fractures was 8.7/100,000/year. After the age of 60 years, a rapid increase in the incidence of distal femoral fractures was observed in both genders, with a large female predominance. Low-energy injuries were the most common mode of injury in both genders (97%), with approximately 61% being the result of a fall from standing height. AO classification type A (extra-articular fractures) was the most common of all fractures (38.6%). Eighty-four patients (28.7%) were admitted with periprosthetic fractures, corresponding to an overall incidence of periprosthetic fractures of 2.4/100,000/year.

Conclusions

The present study shows an incidence of 8.7/100,000/year of distal femur fractures. After the age of 60 years, a rapid increase in the incidence of distal femoral fractures was observed in both genders, with a considerable female predominance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Court-Brown CM (2015) Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. Walters Kluwer, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ng AC, Drake MT, Clarke BL et al (2012) Trends in subtrochanteric, diaphyseal, and distal femur fractures, 1984-2007. Osteoporos Int 23:1721–1726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1777-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kolmert L, Wulff K (1982) Epidemiology and treatment of distal femoral fractures in adults. Acta Orthop Scand 53:957–962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B (2006) Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37:691–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pietu G, Lebaron M, Flecher X et al (2014) Epidemiology of distal femur fractures in France in 2011-12. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100:545–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.06.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martinet O, Cordey J, Harder Y et al (2000) The epidemiology of fractures of the distal femur. Injury 31(Suppl 3):C62–C63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Della Rocca GJ, Leung KS, Pape H-C (2011) Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and future projections. J Orthop Trauma 25(Suppl 2):S66–S70. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821b8c28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Robertsson O, Bizjajeva S, Fenstad AM et al (2010) Knee arthroplasty in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. A pilot study from the Nordic arthroplasty register association. Acta Orthop 81:82–89. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453671003685442

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M (2011) The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health 39:30–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494811401482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thorlund JB, Hare KB, Lohmander LS (2014) Large increase in arthroscopic meniscus surgery in the middle-aged and older population in Denmark from 2000 to 2011. Acta Orthop 85:287–292. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.919558

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Marsh JL, Agel J et al (2007) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification Database and Outcome Committee. J Orthop Trauma 21(10 Suppl):S1–133

  12. Zhang Y (2012) Clinical epidemiology of orthopaedic trauma. Thieme, New York

  13. Andersen JS, Olivarius NDF, Krasnik A (2011) The Danish National Health Service Register. Scand J Public Health 39:34–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810394718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rasmus Elsoe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest concerning this article.

The authors did not receive benefits or grants in any form from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee and with the ethical principles of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (J. no.: 2008–58-0028 id-number: 2016–221). For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elsoe, R., Ceccotti, A.A. & Larsen, P. Population-based epidemiology and incidence of distal femur fractures. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 42, 191–196 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3665-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3665-1

Keywords

Navigation