Skip to main content
Log in

Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal anterior femoral flare and torsion. Anatomic bases for metaphyseally fixed short stems design

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The use of femoral stems with a short metaphyseal fixation may lead to fractures or subsidence. Such failures may be related to a mismatch between the torsions or the sagittal flares of the stem and the femur. The goal of our study was to perform a 3D analysis of the proximal metaphyseal femur anatomy with a special focus on the anterior proximal flare and torsion. Such data may help to detect the outlier patients for whom a short metaphyseal fixation should be avoided.

Methods

A prospective study included 80 consecutive patients who underwent a primary cementless THA with a 3D CT-scan based pre-operative planning. A femoral frame was determined in order to analyse the proximal metaphyseal torsion and flares of the femur.

Results

The mean metaphyseal torsion was 21.6° ± 7° at 5 mm above the lesser trochanter (LT) and 34.7° ± 8.8 at 15 mm under LT generating a differential torsion of 13° around the LT. The mean flare index was 4.3 ± 0.9 medially, 3.7 ± 0.8 laterally, 2 ± 0.6 anteriorly and 3.1 ± 0.6 posteriorly. The anterior flare was the only flare significantly correlated to the bone density, to the age and to the femoral off-set: the higher the anterior flare index, the younger the patient, the higher the bone density and the higher the femoral offset. The anterior flare was not significantly correlated to the femoral anteversion, the metaphyseal torsion and the coronal neck-shaft angle.

Conclusion

The proximal femoral metaphysis presents a highly variable anterior flare and torsion that may explain a mismatch between the femur and the femoral stem, consequently generating a risk of subsidence or fracture when using shortly fixed stems.

Level of Evidence: Level IV

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Oldenrijk J, Molleman J, Klaver M, Poolman R, Haverkamp D (2014) Revision rate after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of 49 studies. Acta Orthop 85:250–258

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (2015) Annual report. Australian registry

  3. Maier M, Streit M, Innmann M, Krüger M, Nadorf J, Kretzer J, Ewerbeck V, Gotterbarm T (2015) Cortical hypertrophy with a short, curved uncemented hip stem does not have any clinical impact during early follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:371

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmidutz F, Graf T, Mazoochian F, Fottner A, Bauer-Melnyk A, Jansson V (2012) Migration analysis of a metaphyseal anchored short-stem hip prosthesis. Acta Orthop 83:360–365

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Husmann O, Rubin P, Leyvraz P, de Roguin B, Argenson J (1997) Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty 12:444–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sariali E, Mouttet A, Mordasini P, Catonné Y (2012) High 10-year survival rate with an anatomic cementless stem (SPS). Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1941–1949

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Noble P, Alexander J, Lindahl L, Yew D, Granberry W, Tullos H (1988) The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:148–165

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huppertz A, Lembcke A, Sariali E, Durmus T, Schwenke C, Hamm B, Sparmann M, Baur A (2015) Low dose computed tomography for 3D planning of total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of radiation exposure and image quality. J Comput Assist Tomogr

  9. Sariali E, Mouttet A, Pasquier G, Durante E (2009) Three dimensionnal hip anatomy in osteoarthritis. Analysis of the femoral off-set. J Arthroplast 24:990–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Murphy S, Simon S, Kijewski P, Wilkinson R, Griscom N (1987) Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:1169–1176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sariali E, Mouttet A, Pasquier G, Durante E, Catonne Y (2009) Accuracy of reconstruction of the hip using computerised three-dimensional pre-operative planning and a cementless modular-neck stem. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 91:333–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kobayashi H, Homma Y, Baba T, Ochi H, Matsumoto M, Yuasa T, Kaneko K (2015) Surgeons changing the approach for total hip arthroplasty from posterior to direct anterior with fluoroscopy should consider potential excessive cup anteversion and flexion implantation of the stem in their early experience. Int Orthop doi:10.1007/s00264-015-3059-1

  13. Jewett BA, Collis DK (2011) High complication rate with anterior total Hip arthroplasties on a fracture table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:503–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee G, Marconi D (2015) Complications following direct anterior hip procedures: costs to both patients and surgeons. J Arthroplast. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.043

  15. Spaans AJ, van den Hout JAAM, Bolder SBT (2012) High complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach. Acta Orthop 83:342–346

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sariali E, Catonné Y, Pascal Moussellard H (2016) Three-dimensional guided total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive direct anterior approach. Clinical outcomes at 5 years follow-up. Int Orthop doi:10.1007/s00264-016-3242-z

  17. Flecher X, Pearce O, Parratte S, Aubaniac J, Argenson J (2010) Custom cementless stem improves hip function in young patients at 15-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:747–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kniesel B, Konstantinidis L, Hirschmüller A, Südkamp N, Helwig P (2014) Digital templating in total knee and hip replacement: an analysis of planning accuracy. Int Orthop 38:733–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sariali E, Mauprivez R, Khiami F, Pascal Moussellard H, Catonne Y (2012) Accuracy of the preoperative planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty. A randomised comparison between three-dimensional computerised planning and conventional templating. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:151–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elhadi Sariali.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding sources were provided for this study.

Conflict of interests

Intellectual property rights: royalties from Symbios SA

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sariali, E., Knaffo, Y. Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal anterior femoral flare and torsion. Anatomic bases for metaphyseally fixed short stems design. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 2017–2023 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3435-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3435-0

Keywords

Navigation