Skip to main content
Log in

Matrix based autologous chondrocyte implantation in children and adolescents: a match paired analysis in a follow-up over three years post-operation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is the investigation of the clinical results after third generation autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee in a follow-up over three years post-operation. Our primary focus is on the effects of this procedure on children and adolescent patients as there is a lack of knowledge regarding the clinical outcomes in children/adolescents in particular when compared with adults.

Methods

A total of 40 patients (43 defects) <20 years with cartilage defects of the knee were treated with third generation ACI (Novocart® 3D). These defects were caused by osteochondritis dissecans (n = 13), acute trauma (<12 months) (n = 9), old trauma (>12 months) (n = 5) or unknown pathology (n = 13). The mean defect size was 5.2 cm2. IKDC subjective score and VAS (at rest and during activity) were used for clinical evaluation after 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-operatively. The results of these patients were compared with 40 matched adult patients. Match paired analysis was performed by numbers of treated defects, defect location and defect size. All cartilage defects were arthroscopically classified with IKDC grade III-IV. All adult patients in the control group were treated with matrix based autologous chondrocyte implantation.

Results

All patients showed significantly better clinical results compared with the pre-operative findings in the follow-up over three years. We observed significantly better results in the IKDC score and VAS during the whole postoperative follow-up in children and adolescents after six, 12, 24 and 36 months compared with the adult control group. The IKDC score improved from 46.5 preoperative to 77.5 (+31) after three years in children and adolescents. Similarly, significantly lower stress pain after six months and one, two and three years was found in this group.

Conclusion

This study showed that third generation autologous chondrocyte implantation is a suitable method for the treatment of full cartilage defects in children and adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ (1998) Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. Instr Course Lect 47:487–504

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmal H, Pestka JM, Salzmann G, Strohm PC, Sudkamp NP, Niemeyer P (2013) Autologous chondrocyte implantation in children and adolescents. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 21(3):671–677. doi:10.1007/s00167-012-2036-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gomoll AH, Gillogly SD, Cole BJ, Farr J, Arnold R, Hussey K, Minas T (2014) Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the patella: a multicenter experience. Am J Sports Med. doi:10.1177/0363546514523927

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pestka JM, Bode G, Salzmann G, Steinwachs M, Schmal H, Sudkamp NP, Niemeyer P (2014) Clinical outcomes after cell-seeded autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee: when can success or failure be predicted? Am J Sports Med 42(1):208–215. doi:10.1177/0363546513507768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Filardo G, Kon E, Di Martino A, Patella S, Altadonna G, Balboni F, Bragonzoni L, Visani A, Marcacci M (2012) Second-generation arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of degenerative cartilage lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 20(9):1704–1713. doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1732-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kreuz PC, Muller S, von Keudell A, Tischer T, Kaps C, Niemeyer P, Erggelet C (2013) Influence of sex on the outcome of autologous chondrocyte implantation in chondral defects of the knee. Am J Sports Med 41(7):1541–1548. doi:10.1177/0363546513489262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Niemeyer P, Pestka JM, Salzmann GM, Sudkamp NP, Schmal H (2012) Influence of cell quality on clinical outcome after autologous chondrocyte implantation. Am J Sports Med 40(3):556–561. doi:10.1177/0363546511428879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nawaz SZ, Bentley G, Briggs TW, Carrington RW, Skinner JA, Gallagher KR, Dhinsa BS (2014) Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee: mid-term to long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(10):824–830. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.01695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goyal D, Goyal A, Keyhani S, Lee EH, Hui JH (2013) Evidence-based status of second- and third-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation over first generation: a systematic review of level I and II studies. Arthroscopy 29(11):1872–1878. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2013.07.271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Niemeyer P, Andereya S, Angele P, Ateschrang A, Aurich M, Baumann M, Behrens P, Bosch U, Erggelet C, Fickert S, Fritz J, Gebhard H, Gelse K, Gunther D, Hoburg A, Kasten P, Kolombe T, Madry H, Marlovits S, Meenen NM, Muller PE, Noth U, Petersen JP, Pietschmann M, Richter W, Rolauffs B, Rhunau K, Schewe B, Steinert A, Steinwachs MR, Welsch GH, Zinser W, Albrecht D (2013) Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) for cartilage defects of the knee: a guideline by the working group “Tissue Regeneration” of the German Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (DGOU). Z Orthop Unfall 151(1):38–47. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1328207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Niemeyer P, Salzmann G, Feucht M, Pestka J, Porichis S, Ogon P, Sudkamp N, Schmal H (2014) First-generation versus second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation for treatment of cartilage defects of the knee: a matched-pair analysis on long-term clinical outcome. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2368-0

    Google Scholar 

  12. Biant LC, Bentley G, Vijayan S, Skinner JA, Carrington RW (2014) Long-term results of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee for chronic chondral and osteochondral defects. Am J Sports Med 42(9):2178–2183. doi:10.1177/0363546514539345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 331(14):889–895. doi:10.1056/NEJM199410063311401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rogers BA, David LA, Briggs TW (2010) Sequential outcome following autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee: a six-year follow-up. Int Orthop 34(7):959–964. doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0842-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Niemeyer P, Porichis S, Steinwachs M, Erggelet C, Kreuz PC, Schmal H, Uhl M, Ghanem N, Sudkamp NP, Salzmann G (2014) Long-term outcomes after first-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage defects of the knee. Am J Sports Med 42(1):150–157. doi:10.1177/0363546513506593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Samsudin EZ, Kamarul T (2015) The comparison between the different generations of autologous chondrocyte implantation with other treatment modalities: a systematic review of clinical trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3649-x

    Google Scholar 

  17. Macmull S, Parratt MT, Bentley G, Skinner JA, Carrington RW, Morris T, Briggs TW (2011) Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the adolescent knee. Am J Sports Med 39(8):1723–1730. doi:10.1177/0363546511404202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pelissier A, Boyer P, Boussetta Y, Bierry G, Van Hille W, Hamon P, Jaeger JH, Massin P (2014) Satisfactory long-term MRI after autologous chondrocyte implantation at the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 22(9):2007–2012. doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2428-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Niethammer T, Valentin S, Ficklscherer A, Gulecyuz M, Pietschmann M, Muller P (2015) Revision surgery after third generation autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2792-9

    Google Scholar 

  20. Krishnan SP, Skinner JA, Carrington RW, Flanagan AM, Briggs TW, Bentley G (2006) Collagen-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondritis dissecans of the knee: two- to seven-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol 88(2):203–205. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88B2.17009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Micheli LJ, Moseley JB, Anderson AF, Browne JE, Erggelet C, Arciero R, Fu FH, Mandelbaum BR (2006) Articular cartilage defects of the distal femur in children and adolescents: treatment with autologous chondrocyte implantation. J Pediatr Orthop 26(4):455–460. doi:10.1097/01.bpo.0000224565.72762.eb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Niethammer TR, Safi E, Ficklscherer A, Horng A, Feist M, Feist-Pagenstert I, Jansson V, Pietschmann MF, Muller PE (2014) Graft maturation of autologous chondrocyte implantation: magnetic resonance investigation with T2 mapping. Am J Sports Med. doi:10.1177/0363546514538756

    Google Scholar 

  23. Muller S, Hirschmuller A, Erggelet C, Beckmann NA, Kreuz PC (2014) Significantly worse isokinetic hamstring-quadriceps ratio in patellofemoral compared to condylar defects 4 years after autologous chondrocyte implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-2964-y

    Google Scholar 

  24. Salzmann GM, Sah BR, Schmal H, Niemeyer P, Sudkamp NP (2012) Microfracture for treatment of knee cartilage defects in children and adolescents. Pediatr Rep 4(2), e21. doi:10.4081/pr.2012.e21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kessler JI, Nikizad H, Shea KG, Jacobs JC Jr, Bebchuk JD, Weiss JM (2014) The demographics and epidemiology of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee in children and adolescents. Am J Sports Med 42(2):320–326. doi:10.1177/0363546513510390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gudas R, Simonaityte R, Cekanauskas E, Tamosiunas R (2009) A prospective, randomized clinical study of osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans in the knee joint in children. J Pediatr Orthop 29(7):741–748. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181b8f6c7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kocher MS, Czarnecki JJ, Andersen JS, Micheli LJ (2007) Internal fixation of juvenile osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the knee. Am J Sports Med 35(5):712–718. doi:10.1177/0363546506296608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kouzelis A, Plessas S, Papadopoulos AX, Gliatis I, Lambiris E (2006) Herbert screw fixation and reverse guided drillings, for treatment of types III and IV osteochondritis dissecans. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 14(1):70–75. doi:10.1007/s00167-005-0634-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Webb JE, Lewallen LW, Christophersen C, Krych AJ, McIntosh AL (2013) Clinical outcome of internal fixation of unstable juvenile osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the knee. Orthopedics 36(11):e1444–e1449. doi:10.3928/01477447-20131021-30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ochs BG, Muller-Horvat C, Albrecht D, Schewe B, Weise K, Aicher WK, Rolauffs B (2011) Remodeling of articular cartilage and subchondral bone after bone grafting and matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Am J Sports Med 39(4):764–773. doi:10.1177/0363546510388896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Peterson L, Minas T, Brittberg M, Lindahl A (2003) Treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation: results at two to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 2):17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cole BJ, DeBerardino T, Brewster R, Farr J, Levine DW, Nissen C, Roaf P, Zaslav K (2012) Outcomes of autologous chondrocyte implantation in study of the treatment of articular repair (STAR) patients with osteochondritis dissecans. Am J Sports Med 40(9):2015–2022. doi:10.1177/0363546512453292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

T.R.N., M.F.P., and P.E.M. are members of the working group “Tissue Regeneration” of the German Society for Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

There was no financial support of this project. The authors have received nothing of value. This manuscript does not contain information about medical devices.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Richard Niethammer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Ethical approval

Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained from the ethical committee of the Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) of Munich.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niethammer, T.R., Holzgruber, M., Gülecyüz, M.F. et al. Matrix based autologous chondrocyte implantation in children and adolescents: a match paired analysis in a follow-up over three years post-operation. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 343–350 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3321-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3321-1

Keywords

Navigation