Skip to main content
Log in

Second-generation arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of degenerative cartilage lesions

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Degenerative cartilage lesions present a negative joint environment, which may have a negative effect on the process of cartilage regeneration. The aim of this study is to analyze the clinical outcome obtained with the treatment for isolated degenerative knee cartilage lesions by second-generation arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI).

Methods

Fifty-eight consecutive patients affected by focal degenerative chondral lesions of the femoral condyles and trochlea were treated by second-generation arthroscopic ACI. The mean age at surgery was 34.7 ± 9.1 years and the average defect size was 2.3 ± 0.9 cm2. The patients were prospectively evaluated with IKDC, EQ-VAS, and Tegner scores preoperatively, at 2 and 6 years.

Results

A statistically significant improvement was observed in all scores from the basal evaluation to the final follow-up. The IKDC subjective score improved from 39.3 ± 13.6 to 68.8 ± 22.7 and 68.5 ± 23.9 at the 2- and 6-year follow-ups, respectively, with a significant improvement (P < 0.0005) and stable results over time; the same trend was confirmed by the EQ-VAS and Tegner scores. The worst results were found in patients with a low physical activity level, women, and those having undergone previous surgery, whereas the symptom duration before surgery did not influence the final outcome. The failure rate was 18.5%.

Conclusions

Despite a significant improvement, the results were lower with respect to the outcome reported in different study populations, and the number of failures was markedly higher, too. Tissue-engineered cartilage implantation is a promising approach for the treatment of degenerative chondral lesions, but graft properties, besides mechanical and biochemical joint environment, have to be improved.

Level of evidence

Case series, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bae DK, Yoon KH, Song SJ (2006) Cartilage healing after microfracture in osteoarthritic knees. Arthroscopy 22(4):367–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Basad E, Ishaque B, Bachmann G, Stürz H, Steinmeyer J (2010) Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee: a 2-year randomised study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(4):519–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Behrens P, Bitter T, Kurz B, Russlies M (2006) Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation/implantation (MATC/MACI) 5 year follow–up. Knee 13:194–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bekkers JE, Inklaar M, Saris DB (2009) Treatment selection in articular cartilage lesions of the knee: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 37(1):148S–155S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bosnakovski D, Mizuno M, Kim G, Takagi S, Okumura M, Fujinaga T (2006) Chondrogenic differentiation of bovine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in different hydrogels: influence of collagen type II extracellular matrix on MSC chondrogenesis. Biotechnol Bioeng 20 93(6):1152–1163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brittberg M (2010) Cell carriers as the next generation of cell therapy for cartilage repair: a review of the matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation procedure. Am J Sports Med 38(6):1259–1271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:889–895

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Browne JE, Anderson AF, Arciero R et al (2005) Clinical outcome of autologous chondrocyte implantation at 5 years in US subjects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:237–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ (1997) Articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 79A(4):600–611

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ (1997) Articular cartilage. Part II: degeneration and osteoarthrosis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. J Bone Joint Surg 79A(4):612–632

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cavallo C, Desando G, Facchini A, Grigolo B (2010) Chondrocytes from patients with osteoarthritis express typical extracellular matrix molecules once grown onto a three-dimensional hyaluronan-based scaffold. J Biomed Mater Res A 93(1):86–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cicuttini F, Ding C, Wluka A, Davis S, Ebeling PR, Jones G (2005) Association of cartilage defects with loss of knee cartilage in healthy, middle-age adults: a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 52(7):2033–2039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Davies-Tuck ML, Wluka AE, Wang Y, Teichtahl AJ, Jones G, Ding C, Cicuttini FM (2008) The natural history of cartilage defects in people with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 16(3):337–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. de Windt TS, Bekkers JE, Creemers LB, Dhert WJ, Saris DB (2009) Patient profiling in cartilage regeneration: prognostic factors determining success of treatment for cartilage defects. Am J Sports Med 37(1):58S–62S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Della Villa S, Kon E, Filardo G, Ricci M, Vincentelli F, Delcogliano M, Marcacci M (2010) Does intensive rehabilitation permit early return to sport without compromising the clinical outcome after arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in highly competitive athletes? Am J Sports Med 38(1):68–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferruzzi A, Buda R, Faldini C, Vannini F et al (2008) Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee joint: open compared with arthroscopic technique. Comparison at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(4):90–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Filardo G, Kon E, Berruto M, et al. (2011) Arthroscopic second generation autologous chondrocytes implantation associated to bone grafting for the treatment of knee osteochondritis dissecans: results at 6 years. The Knee. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2011.08.007

  18. Filardo G, Kon E, Di Martino A, Iacono F, Marcacci M (2011) Arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation: A prospective 7-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. doi:10.1177/0363546511415658

  19. Gille J, Schuseil E, Wimmer J, Gellissen J, Schulz AP, Behrens P (2010) Mid-term results of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for treatment of focal cartilage defects in the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(11):1456–1464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gobbi A, Kon E, Berruto M et al (2009) Patellofemoral full-thickness chondral defects treated with second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation: results at 5 years’ follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37(6):1083–1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gomoll AH, Madry H, Knutsen G, van Dijk N, Seil R, Brittberg M, Kon E (2010) The subchondral bone in articular cartilage repair: current problems in the surgical management. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(4):434–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gratz KR, Wong BL, Bae WC, Sah RL (2009) The effects of focal articular defects on cartilage contact mechanics. J Orthop Res 27(5):584–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hollander AP, Dickinson SC, Sims TJ et al (2006) Maturation of tissue engineered cartilage implanted in injured and osteoarthritic human knees. Tissue Eng 12(7):1787–1798

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. ICRS Cartilage Injury Evaluation Package 2000 http://www.cartilage.org/Evaluation_Package/ICRS_Evaluation.pdf

  25. Knutsen G, Engebretsen L, Ludvigsen TC et al (2004) Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86(3):455–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Knutsen G, Drogset JO, Engebretsen L et al (2007) A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture. Findings at 5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(10):2105–2112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kon E, Delcogliano M, Filardo G, Montaperto C, Marcacci M (2008) Second generation issues in cartilage repair. Sports Med Arthrosc 16(4):221–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kon E, Filardo G, Berruto M, Benazzo F, Zanon G, Della Villa S, Marcacci M (2011) Articular cartilage treatment in high-level male soccer players: a prospective comparative study of arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture. Am J Sports Med. doi:10.1177/0363546511420688

  29. Kon E, Gobbi A, Filardo G, Delcogliano M, Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M (2009) Arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture for chondral lesions of the knee: prospective nonrandomized study at 5 years. Am J Sports Med 37(1):33–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kon E, Verdonk P, Condello V et al (2009) Matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation for the repair of cartilage defects of the knee: systematic clinical data review and study quality analysis. Am J Sports Med 37(1):156S–166S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kreuz PC, Müller S, Ossendorf C, Kaps C, Erggelet C (2009) Treatment of focal degenerative cartilage defects with polymer-based autologous chondrocyte grafts: four-year clinical results. Arthritis Res Ther 11(2):R33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Løken S, Ludvigsen TC, Høysveen T, Holm I, Engebretsen L, Reinholt FP (2009) Autologous chondrocyte implantation to repair knee cartilage injury: ultrastructural evaluation at 2 years and long-term follow-up including muscle strength measurements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(11):1278–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S, Kon E, Visani A, Iacono F, Loreti I (2002) Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte transplantation: technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10(3):154–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Marlovits S, Singer P, Zeller P et al (2006) Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) for the evaluation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation: determination of interobserver variability and correlation to clinical outcome after 2 years. Eur J Radiol 57(1):16–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Miller BS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ, Rodkey WG (2004) Patient satisfaction and outcome after microfracture of the degenerative knee. J Knee Surg 17(1):13–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Minas T, Gomoll AH, Solpour S, Rosenberger R, Probst C, Bryant T (2010) Autologous chondrocyte transplantation for joint preservation in patients with early osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:146–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mithöfer K, Minas T, Peterson L, Yeon H, Micheli LJ (2005) Functional outcome of articular cartilage repair in adolescent athletes. Am J Sports Med 33:1147–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mithoefer K, Williams RJ, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, Marx RG (2006) High-impact athletics after knee articular cartilage repair: A prospective evaluation of the microfracture technique. Am J Sports Med 34:1413–1418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nehrer S, Domayer S, Dorotka S, et al. (2007) Five years clinical results after matrix assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation using a hyaluronan matrix. Osteoarthr Cartil. 15(B,16.7):74

  40. Ochi M, Uchio Y, Kawasaki K, Wakitani S, Iwasa J (2002) Transplantation of cartilage-like tissue made by tissue engineering in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(4):571–578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ossendorf C, Kaps C, Kreuz PC, Burmester GR, Sittinger M, Erggelet C (2007) Treatment of posttraumatic and focal osteoarthritic cartilage defects of the knee with autologous polymer-based three-dimensional chondrocyte grafts: 2-year clinical results. Arthritis Res Ther 9(2):R41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ozsoy MH, Aydogdu S, Taskiran D, Sezak M, Hayran M, Oztop F, Ozsoy A (2009) The effects of early or late treatment of osteochondral defects on joint homoeostasis: an experimental study in rabbits. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(6):578–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Peterson L, Brittberg M, Kiviranta I, Akerlund EL, Lindahl A (2002) Autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Biomechanics and long-term durability. Am J. Sports Med 30(1):2–12

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rodrigo JJ, Steadman JR, Syftestad G, Benton H, Silliman J (1995) Effects of human knee synovial fluid on chondrogenesis in vitro. Am J Knee Surg 8(4):124–129

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Saris DB, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ (2003) Joint homeostasis. The discrepancy between old and fresh defects in cartilage repair. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(7):1067–1076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Saris DB, Vanlauwe J, Victor J et al (2008) Characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better structural repair when treating symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee in a randomized controlled trial versus microfracture. Am J Sports Med 36(2):235–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Saris DB, Vanlauwe J, Victor J et al (2009) Treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better clinical outcome at 36 months in a randomized trial compared to microfracture. Am J Sports Med 37(1):10S–19S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sgaglione NA, Miniaci A, Gillogly SD, Carter TR (2002) Update on advanced surgical techniques in the treatment of traumatic focal articular cartilage lesions in the knee. Arthroscopy 18(2):9–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tallheden T, Bengtsson C, Brantsing C et al (2005) Proliferation and differentiation potential of chondrocytes from osteoarthritic patients. Arthritis Res Ther 7(3):R560–R568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198:43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ulrich-Vinther M, Maloney MD, Schwarz EM, Rosier R, O’Keefe RJ (2003) Articular cartilage biology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11(6):421–430

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The following authors were acknowledged for their assistance in this work: L. D’Orazio, B. Di Matteo, F. Perdisa, S. Bassini, A. Montaperto: III Clinic—Biomechanics Laboratory, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy. E. Pignotti, K. Smith: Task Force, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy. This work was partially supported by the project Regione Emilia Romagna Programma di Ricerca Regione-Universita’ 2007-2009 (Regenerative Medicine in Osteoarticular Disease).

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizaveta Kon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Filardo, G., Kon, E., Di Martino, A. et al. Second-generation arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of degenerative cartilage lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 1704–1713 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1732-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1732-5

Keywords

Navigation