Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total hip replacement for osteoporotic acetabular fractures: a retrospective clinical study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Treating acetabular fractures with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) may lead to poorer outcomes in older patients. As data for osteoporotic acetabular fractures are limited, we compared primary total hip replacement (THR) with ORIF for treating osteoporotic acetabular fractures, including those with posterior column instability.

Methods

All patients with osteoporotic acetabular fractures, treated with ORIF or primary THR from 2005 to 2015, were assessed retrospectively for clinical and radiologic outcomes. Indication criteria for selecting primary THR were evaluated.

Results

Twenty-three patients were treated with ORIF and nine with primary THR (performed with an anti-protrusion cage). If the posterior column was unstable, THR was combined with posterior column bridge plating. Indications for THR were the presence of a comminuted fracture pattern, approach-related risk factors for ORIF, and mobilization issues. Biomechanical reconstruction was acceptable with THR. Acetabular component loosening was observed only once. Secondary THR was indicated in 45 % of the ORIF cases.

Discussion

ORIF for acetabular fracture in older patients is unsatisfactory and may be even worse for osteoporotic fractures. Immobilization for long-term restricted weight bearing after ORIF is hazardous. Primary THR may enable early post-operative full weight-bearing. Various techniques, affording fixation of the unstable acetabular columns, are described. In THR with an anti-protrusion cage, only dorsal column instability needs to be addressed.

Conclusion

The described technique achieved sufficient acetabular component stability. Primary THR with an anti-protrusion cage is an advantageous option to ORIF and should be strongly considered for osteoporotic acetabular fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ochs BG, Marintschev I, Hoyer H, Rolauffs B, Culemann U, Pohlemann T, Stuby FM (2010) Changes in the treatment of acetabular fractures over 15 years: Analysis of 1266 cases treated by the German Pelvic Multicentre Study Group (DAO/DGU). Injury 41:839–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DVO (2014) Prophylaxe, Diagnostik und Therapie der Osteoporose bei Männern ab dem 60. Lebensjahr und bei postmenopausalen Frauen S3-Leitlinie des Dachverbands der Deutschsprachigen Wissenschaftlichen Osteologischen Gesellschaften. Dachverband Osteologie. http://www.dv-osteologie.org/dvo_leitlinien/osteoporose-leitlinie-2014. Accessed 23 April 2015

  3. Kim J, Herbert B, Hao J, Min W, Ziran B, Mauffrey C (2015) Acetabular fractures in elderly patients: a comparative study of low-energy versus high-energy injuries. Int Orthop 39:1175–1179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mears D, Velyvis J (2002) Acute total hip arthroplasty for selected displaced acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 84-A(1):1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Matta (1996) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:1632–1645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Herscovici DJ, Lindvall E, Bolhofner B, Scaduto J (2010) The combined hip procedure: open reduction internal fixation combined with total hip arthroplasty for the management of acetabular fractures in the elderly. J Orthop Trauma 24:291–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Daurka J, Pastides P, Lewis A, Rickman M, Bircher M (2014) Acetabular fractures in patients aged > 55 years: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J 96:157–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bronsema E, Stroet M, Zengerink M, van Kampen A, Schreurs B (2014) Impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture. Int Orthop 38:2441–2446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spencer R (1989) Acetabular fractures in older patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 71:774–776

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carroll E, Huber F, Goldman A, Virkus W, Pagenkopf E, Lorich D, Helfet D (2010) Treatment of Acetabular Fractures in an Older Population. J Orthop Trauma 24:637–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kreder H, Rozen N, Borkhoff C, Laflamme Y, McKee M, Schemitsch E, DJ S (2006) Determinants of functional outcome after simple and complex acetabular fractures involving the posterior wall. J Bone Joint Surg Br:776–782

  12. Archdeacon M, Kazemi N, Collinge C, Budde B, Schnell S (2013) Treatment of protrusio fractures of the acetabulum in patients 70 years and older. J Orthop Trauma 27(5):256–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mouhsine E, Garofalo R, Borens O, Fischer J, Crevoisier X, Pelet S, Blanc C, Leyvraz P (2002) Acute total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures in the elderly. Acta Orthop Scand 73:615–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pagenkopf E, Grose A, Partal G, Helfet D (2006) Acetabular fractures in the elderly: treatment recommendations. HSS J: Musculoskeletal J Hosp Spec Surg 2:161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Enocson A, Blomfeldt R (2014) Acetabular fractures in the elderly treated with a primary Burch-Schneider reinforcement ring, autologous bone graft, and a total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study with a 4-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 28:330–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tidermark J, Blomfeldt R, Ponzer S, Söderqvist A, Törnkvist H (2003) Primary total hip arthroplasty with a Burch-Schneider antiprotrusion cage and autologous bone grafting for acetabular fractures in elderly patients. J Orthop Trauma 17:193–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh M, Nagrath A, Maini P (1970) Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:457–467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Letournel (1980) Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res 151:81–106

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schmidutz F, Beirer M, Weber P, Mazoochian F, Fottner A, Jansson V (2012) Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: comparison between modular short-stem hip arthroplasty and conventional total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 36:1341–1347

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Brooker A, Bowerman J, Robinson R, Riley LJ (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mehlman C, Meiss L, DiPasquale T (2000) Hyphenated-history: the Kocher-Langenbeck surgical approach. J Orthop Trauma 14:60–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Keel M, Bastian J, Büchler L, Siebenrock K (2013) Anterior approaches to the acetabulum. Unfallchirurg 116:213–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S, Oberthaler W (1979) The transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Arch Orthop Traum Surg 95:47–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Oh C, Kim P, Park B, Kim S, Kyung H, Jeon I, Cheon S, Min W (2006) Results after operative treatment of transverse acetabular fractures. J Orthop Sci 11:478–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu X, Xu S, Zhang C, Su J, Yu B (2010) Application of a shape-memory alloy internal fixator for treatment of acetabular fractures with a follow-up of two to nine years in China. Int Orthop 34:1033–1040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Laflamme G, Hebert-Davies J, Rouleau D, Benoit B, Leduc S (2011) Internal fixation of osteopenic acetabular fractures involving the quadrilateral plate. Injury 42:1130–1134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Guerado E, Cano J, Cruz E (2012) Surgical technique: Intraacetabular osteosynthesis with arthroplasty for acetabular fracture in the octogenarian. Injury 43:509–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rickman M, Young J, Trompeter A, Pearce R, Hamilton M (2014) Managing acetabular fractures in the elderly with fixation and primary arthroplasty: aiming for early weightbearing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3375–3382

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Würzburg, König-Ludwig-Haus, 11 Brettreichstrasse, 97074, Würzburg, Germany

    Sebastian P. Boelch

  2. Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Würzburg University Hospital, Julius-Maximilians University Würzburg, 6 Oberdürrbacher Strasse, 97080, Würzburg, Germany

    Martin C. Jordan, Rainer H. Meffert & Hendrik Jansen

Authors
  1. Sebastian P. Boelch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin C. Jordan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rainer H. Meffert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hendrik Jansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian P. Boelch.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boelch, S.P., Jordan, M.C., Meffert, R.H. et al. Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total hip replacement for osteoporotic acetabular fractures: a retrospective clinical study. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 1831–1837 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3260-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3260-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation