Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Drain use in total knee arthroplasty is neither associated with a greater transfusion rate nor a longer hospital stay

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In recent years, the exclusion of a drain in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is gaining popularity. This retrospective study aims to investigate a tertiary hospital’s experience with the use of a drain in TKA. The authors hypothesise that the use of a drain will: (1) increase the peri-operative total blood loss (TBL) and transfusion rate; (2) increase the length of hospital stay (LOS); (3) reduce the 30-day readmission rate and incidence of additional surgical procedure performed.

Methods

Patients who underwent a unilateral primary TKA in 2012 were included. Seven surgeons performed 575 TKAs with the use of drains, while nine other surgeons performed 902 TKAs without the use of drains. The patients were prospectively followed-up for two years. Peri-operative TBL was calculated using the haemoglobin balance method. All patients followed the hospital’s transfusion and post-operative rehabilitation protocol.

Results

There was a bigger drop in haemoglobin level by 0.5 g/dl (95 % CI, 0.4, 0.6) and greater TBL by 169 ml (95 % CI, 126, 181) in the drain group (both p < 0.001). However, the transfusion rate was 37/575 (6.4 %) and 48/902 (5.3 %) in the drain and no drain groups respectively (p = 0.370), while the LOS was four (IQR, 4, 5) and four (IQR 3, 5) days respectively (p = 0.228). The 30-day readmission rate was 10/575 (1.7 %) in the drain group, compared with 26/902 (2.9 %) in the no-drain group (p = 0.165). The incidence of additional surgical procedure performed was 5/575 (0.9 %) in the drain group, compared with 15/902 (1.7 %) in the no-drain group (p = 0.198).

Conclusions

Although the use of a drain in TKA is associated with greater peri-operative TBL, this additional amount of blood loss does not translate into an increased transfusion rate or a longer LOS. It also does not reduce the 30-day readmission rate and incidence of additional surgical procedure performed on the same knee.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dillon CF, Rasch EK, Gu Q, Hirsch R (2006) Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the United States: arthritis data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1991-94. J Rheumatol 33:2271–2279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahomed NN, Barrett J, Katz JN, Baron JA, Wright J, Losina E (2005) Epidemiology of total knee replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1222–1228

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Murphy L, Helmick CG (2012) The impact of osteoarthritis in the United States: a population-health perspective. Am J Nurs 112:S13–S19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Waugh TR, Stinchfield FE (1961) Suction drainage of orthopaedic wounds. J Bone Joint Surg Am 43:939–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beer KJ, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Vaughn BK (1991) The efficacy of suction drains after routine total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:584–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parker MJ, Livingstone V, Clifton R, McKee A (2007) Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001825

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dickinson GM, Bisno AL (1989) Infections associated with indwelling devices: infections related to extravascular devices. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 33:602–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bjerke-Kroll BT, Sculco PK, McLawhorn AS, Christ AB, Gladnick BP, Mayman DJ (2014) The increased total cost associated with post-operative drains in total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29:895–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ovadia D, Luger E, Bickels J, Menachem A, Dekel S (1997) Efficacy of closed wound drainage after total joint arthroplasty. A prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 12:317–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Quinn M, Bowe A, Galvin R, Dawson P, O’Byrne J (2015) The use of postoperative suction drainage in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Int Orthop 39:653–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen JY, Chin PL, Moo IH, Pang HN, Tay DK, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ (2016) Intravenous versus intra-articular tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: a double-blinded randomised controlled noninferiority trial. Knee 23:152–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hak DJ (2000) Retained broken wound drains: a preventable complication. J Orthop Trauma 14:212–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li T, Zhuang Q, Weng X, Zhou L, Bian Y (2014) Non-continuous versus continuous wound drainage after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 38:361–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen JY, Rikhraj IS, Zhou Z, Tay DK, Chin PL, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ (2014) Can tranexamic acid and hydrogen peroxide reduce blood loss in cemented total knee arthroplasty? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:997–1002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu M, Chen JY, Tan YR, Yew AK, Chong HC, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ (2015) Effects of anesthetic technique on blood loss and complications after simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:565–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nadler SB, Hidalgo JU, Bloch T (1962) Prediction of blood volume in normal human adults. Surgery 51:224–232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Adalberth G, Byström S, Kolstad K, Mallmin H, Milbrink J (1998) Postoperative drainage of knee arthroplasty is not necessary: a randomized study of 90 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 69:475–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Crevoisier XM, Reber P, Noesberger B (1998) Is suction drainage necessary after total joint arthroplasty? A prospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117:121–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Esler CN, Blakeway C, Fiddian NJ (2003) The use of a closed-suction drain in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 85:215–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar S, Penematsa S, Parekh S (2007) Are drains required following a routine primary total joint arthroplasty? Int Orthop 31:593–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Omonbude D, El Masry MA, O’Connor PJ, Grainger AJ, Allgar VL, Calder SJ (2010) Measurement of joint effusion and haematoma formation by ultrasound in assessing the effectiveness of drains after total knee replacement: a prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 92:51–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sundaram RO, Parkinson RW (2007) Closed suction drains do not increase the blood transfusion rates in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 31:613–616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM (1994) Closed wound drainage in total hip or total knee replacement. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:35–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Alshryda S, Sukeik M, Sarda P, Blenkinsopp J, Haddad FS, Mason JM (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the topical administration of tranexamic acid in total hip and knee replacement. Bone Joint J 96:1005–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Minnema B, Vearncombe M, Augustin A, Gollish J, Simor AE (2004) Risk factors for surgical-site infection following primary total knee arthroplasty. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 25:477–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eipe NP, Ponniah M (2006) Perioperative blood loss assessment—how accurate? Indian J Anaesth 50:35–38

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a hospital research grant (SHF/FG553P/2014). The authors thank TingFang Li for her technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Academia Building Level 4, Singapore, 169856, Singapore

    Jerry Yongqiang Chen, Wu Chean Lee, Hiok Yang Chan, Paul Chee Cheng Chang, Ngai Nung Lo & Seng Jin Yeo

Authors
  1. Jerry Yongqiang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wu Chean Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hiok Yang Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paul Chee Cheng Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ngai Nung Lo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Seng Jin Yeo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerry Yongqiang Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J.Y., Lee, W.C., Chan, H.Y. et al. Drain use in total knee arthroplasty is neither associated with a greater transfusion rate nor a longer hospital stay. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 2505–2509 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3239-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3239-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation