Skip to main content
Log in

Closed suction drains do not increase the blood transfusion rates in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aim to determine whether the presence of a drain increases the actual blood transfusion rates in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A retrospective review was performed on two consecutive groups of patients who underwent primary TKA: group 1 including 100 patients who underwent TKA and had one deep closed suction drain; group 2 including 100 patients who underwent TKA and had no drain. Blood transfusions were given post-operatively on the basis of clinical need without a pre-determined haemoglobin trigger factor. Group 1 drained a mean of 692 ml (range 150–1500) of blood in 48 h. The mean fall in haemoglobin at 48 h post-operatively was 3.26 g/dl in group 1 and 3.33 g/dl in group 2. Nine patients in group 1 and seven patients in group 2 required a blood transfusion; this was not statistically significant (P=0.79). Transfusion of primary TKA patients on the basis of clinical need can result in post-operative transfusion rates of 8%. The presence of a drain does not increase the transfusion rates of patients undergoing primary TKA.

Résumé

Le but de cette étude est de déterminer si la mise en place d’un drain entraîne une augmentation du taux de transfusion chez les patients qui ont bénéficié d’une prothèse totale du genou. Une étude rétrospective a été réalisée à partir d’un groupe de patients ayant bénéficié d’une prothèse totale du genou de première intention. Dans le premier groupe 5 patients ont bénéficié d’une prothèse totale avec un drainage, dans le deuxième groupe, 100 patients ont bénéficié de la même prothèse sans drain. Dans le premier groupe le drainage a permis de récolter 692 ml de sang (150 à 1.500) en 48 heures. Le taux moyen d’hémoglobine post-opératoire à 48 heures était de 3.26 g/dl dans le groupe 1 et de 3.33 g/dl dans le groupe 2. 9 patients du groupe 1 et 7 patients du groupe 2 ont nécessité une transfusion. La différence n’est pas significative. Le taux de patients nécessitant une transfusion post-opératoire est de 8%, l’indication étant posée sur l’état clinique du patient, la présence d’un drain n’augmente pas le taux de transfusion après une prothèse totale du genou de première intention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adalberth G, Bystrom S, Kosltad K, Mallmin H, Milbrink J (1998) Postoperative drainage of knee arthroplasty is not necessary. Acta Orthop Scand 69:475–478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashraf T, Darmanis S, Krikler SJ (2001) Effectiveness of suction drainage after primary or revision total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 24:1158–1160

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Canty SJ, Shepard GJ, Ryan WG, Banks AJ (2003) Do we practice evidence based medicine with regard to drain usage in knee arthroplasty? Result of a questionnaire of BASK members. Knee 10:385–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chandratreya A, Giannikas K, Livesley P (1998) To drain or not to drain: literature review versus practice. J R Coll Surg Edinb 43:404–406

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cushner FD, Freidman RJ (1991) Blood loss in total knee arthroplasty. CORR 269:98–101

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cobb JB (1990) Why use drains? J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 72-B 993–995

    Google Scholar 

  7. Corpe RS, Gallentine J, Young TR, Steflik DE, Rectinwald J, Kusuma S (2000) Complications in total knee arthroplasty with and without surgical drainage. J South Orthop Assoc 9:207–212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Esler CAN, Blakeway C, Fiddian NJ (2003) The use of a closed suction drain in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85-B:215–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gainor JW (2000) Transfusion in unilateral knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 23:472–473

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hadjinastassiou VG, Virich G, Lennox IA (2002) Use of the blood transfusion service in total knee replacement arthroplasty: the cost implications. Knee 9:145–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamer AJ, Dobson PMS, Earnshaw PH, Knowles S, Newman JH (2005) Blood conservation in elective orthopaedic surgery. British Orthopaedic Association, London

  12. Helm AT, Karksi MT, Parsons SJ, Sampath JS, Bale RS (2003) A strategy for reducing blood-transfusion requirements in elective orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85-B:484–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Holt BT, Parks NL, Engh GA, Lawrence JM (1997) Comparison of closed-suction drainage and no drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 20:1121–1124

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jenny J-Y, Boeri C, Lafare S (2001) No drainage does not increase complication risk after total knee prosthesis implantation: a prospective comparative randomised study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:299–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehra A, Murray J, de Alwis C (2004) A safe, simple and cost-effective protocol for blood transfusion in primary knee replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 86:260–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mylod AG, France MP, Muser DE, Parsons R (1990) Peri-operative blood loss associated with total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72-A:1010–1012

    Google Scholar 

  17. Niskanen RO, Korkala OL, Haapala J, Kuokkanen HO, Kaukonen JP, Salo SA (2000) Drainage is of no use in primary uncomplicated cemented hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 15:567–569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ovadia D, Luger E, Bickels J, Menachem A, Dekel S (1997) Efficacy of closed wound drainage after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12:317–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Parker MJ, Roberts CP, Hay D (2004) Closed suction drainage for hip and knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 86-A:1146–1152

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peter VK, Radford M, Matthews MG (2001) Re-transfusion of autologous blood from wound drains: the means for reducing transfusion requirements in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 8:321–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ritter MA, Keating M, Faris PM (1994) Closed wound drainage in total hip or total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 76-A:35–38

    Google Scholar 

  22. Salido JA, Marin LA, Gomez LA, Zorrilla P, Martinez C (2002) Pre-operative haemoglobin levels and the need for transfusion after prosthetic hip and knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 84-A:216–220

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sinha A, Sinha M, Burgert S (2001) Re-infusion of drained blood as an alternative to homologous blood transfusion after total knee replacement. Int Orthop 25:257–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Spencer J, Thomas SRYW, Yardy G, Mukundan C, Barrington R (2005) Are we overusing blood transfusing after elective joint replacement? A simple method to reduce the use of a scarce resource. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 87:28–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomas D, Wareham K, Cohen D, Hutchings H (2001) Autologous blood transfusion in total knee replacement surgery. Br J Anaesth 86:669–673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. O. Sundaram.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sundaram, R.O., Parkinson, R.W. Closed suction drains do not increase the blood transfusion rates in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics (SICO 31, 613–616 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0232-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0232-6

Keywords

Navigation