Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical significance of corrosion of cemented femoral stems in metal-on-metal hips: a retrieval study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The clinical significance of corrosion of cemented femoral stems is unclear. The purpose of this retrieval study was to: (1) report on corrosion at the stem-cement interface and (2) correlate these findings with clinical data.

Methods

We analysed cemented stems (n = 36) composed of cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and stainless steel (SS) in a series of revised metal-on-metal hips. We performed detailed inspection of each stem to assess the severity of corrosion at the stem-cement interface using a scale of 1 (low) to 5 (severe). We assessed the severity of corrosion at each stem trunnion and measured wear rates at the head taper and bearing surfaces. We used non-parametric tests to determine the significance of differences between the CoCr and SS stems in relation to: (1) pre-revision whole blood Co and Cr metal ion levels, (2) trunnion corrosion, (3) bearing surface wear and (4) taper material loss.

Results

The corrosion scores of CoCr stems were significantly greater than SS stems (p < 0.01). Virtually all stem trunnions in both alloy groups had minimal evidence of corrosion. The median pre-revision Co levels of implants with CoCr stems were significantly greater than the SS stems (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in relation to pre-revision Cr levels (p = 0.521). There was no significant difference between the two stem types in relation to bearing wear (p = 0.926) or taper wear (p = 0.148).

Conclusions

Severe corrosion of cemented femoral stems is a common finding at our retrieval centre; surgeons should consider corrosion of CoCr stems as a potential source of metal ions when revising a hip.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hart AJ, Muirhead-Allwood S, Porter M et al (2013) Which factors determine the wear rate of large-diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements? J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:678–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Langton DJ, Joyce TJ, Jameson SS et al (2011) Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 93(2):164–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kop AM, Swarts E (2009) Corrosion of a hip stem with a modular neck taper junction: a retrieval study of 16 cases. J Arthroplasty 24:1019–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gill IP, Webb J, Sloan K, Beaver RJ (2012) Corrosion at the neck-stem junction as a cause of metal ion release and pseudotumour formation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 94-B:895–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg JR, Gilbert JL, Jacobs JJ, Bauer TW, Paprosky W, Leurgans S (2002) A multicentre retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop 401:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hothi HS, Matthies AK, Berber R, Whittaker RK et al (2014) The reliability of a scoring system for corrosion and fretting, and its relationship to material loss of tapered, modular junctions of retrieved hip implant. J Arthroplasty 29(6):1313–1317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gascoyne TC, Dyrkacz RM, Turgeon TR et al (2014) Corrosion on the acetabular liner taper from retrieved modular metal-on-metal total hip replacements. J Arthroplasty 29(10):2049–2052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Higgs G, Kurtz S, Hanzlik J, MacDonald D, Kane WM, Day J, Klein GR, Parvizi J, Mont M, Kraay M, Martell J, Gilbert J, Rimnac C (2013) Retrieval analysis of metal-on-metal hip prostheses: characterising fretting and corrosion at modular interfaces. Bone Joint J 95-B(SUPP 15):108

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schmalzried T, Jasty M, Harris WH (1992) Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74-A(6):849–863

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scholl E, Eggli S, Ganz R (2000) Osteolysis in cemented titanium alloy hip prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 15(5):570–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas SR, Shukla D, Latham PD (2004) Corrosion of cemented titanium femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86-B:974–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Willert HG, Broback LG, Buchhorn GH (1996) Crevice corrosion of cemented titanium alloy stems in total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 333:51–75

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hallam P, Haddad F, Cobb J (2003) Pain in the well-fixed, aseptic titanium hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86-B:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bryant M, Ward M, Farrar R et al (2013) Failure analysis of cemented metal-on-metal total hip replacements from a single centre cohort. Wear 301:226–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cook RB, Shearwood-Porter NR, Latham JM, Wood RJK (2015) Volumetric assessment of material loss from retrieved cemented metal hip replacements. Tribol Int 89:105–108

  16. Bills PJ, Racasan R, Underwood RJ, Cann P, Skinner J, Hart AJ, Jiang X, Blunt L (2012) Volumetric wear assessment of retrieved metal-on-metal hip prostheses and the impact of measurement uncertainty. Wear 274:212–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matthies AK, Racasan R, Bills P, Blunt L, Cro S, Panagiotidou A, Blunn G, Skinner J, Hart AJ (2013) Material loss at the taper junction of retrieved large head metal-on-metal total hip replacements. J Orthop Res 31(11):1677–1685

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smeekes C, Ongkiehong B, van der Wal B, Wolterbeek R, Henseler J, Nelissen R (2014) Large fixed-size metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: higher serum metal ion levels in patients with pain. Int Orthop 39:631–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Matharu GS, Pandit HG, Murray DW, Treacy RBC (2015) The future role of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Int Orthop 39:2031–2036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hart AJ, Quinn PD, Lali F et al (2012) Cobalt from metal-on-metal hip replacements may be the clinically relevant active agent responsible for periprosthetic tissue reactions. Acta Biomater 8(10):3865–3873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Matharu GS, Mellon SJ, Murray DW, Pandit HG (2015) Follow-up guidance for metal-on-metal hip replacement patients should be updated. Int Orthop 39:609–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the support of Gwynneth Lloyd and Elizabeth Ellis for their coordination of the retrieval centre. Two authors received funding from the British Orthopaedic Association through an industry consortium of nine manufacturers: DePuy International Ltd (Leeds, UK), Zimmer GmbH (Winterthur, Switzerland), Smith & Nephew UK Ltd (Warwick, UK), Biomet UK Ltd (Bridgend, South Wales, UK), JRI Ltd (London, UK), Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd (Leatherhead, UK), Corin Group PLC (Cirencester, UK), Mathys Orthopaedics Ltd (Alton, UK), and Stryker UK Ltd (Newbury, UK).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry S. Hothi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hothi, H.S., Berber, R., Panagiotopoulos, A.C. et al. Clinical significance of corrosion of cemented femoral stems in metal-on-metal hips: a retrieval study. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 2247–2254 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3116-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3116-4

Keywords

Navigation