Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Large fixed-size metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: higher serum metal ion levels in patients with pain

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Recently, concerns have arisen about metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, the purpose of this cross-sectional cohort study was to describe the incidence of pain, pseudotumours, revisions and the relation between elevated metal ion levels, functional outcome and quality of life after MoM THA.

Methods

In 351 patients, 377 MoM THA with a fixed-size 38-mm head were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 30 months (range 11–58). Evaluation included pain, serum metal ions, patient-reported questionnaires (Short Form-36 [SF-36], Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [HOOS] and the Oxford Hip Score [OHS]) and radiological imaging. Sixteen patients did not participate in the screening.

Results

One hundred and eighteen (35 %) patients reported pain and showed significantly higher cobalt and chromium levels compared to patients without pain. Median serum cobalt levels were 4.4 μg/l (interquartile range [IQR] 6.6) and chromium levels were 3.6 μg/l (IQR 4.8). Patients with cobalt levels of ≤5 μg/l reported significantly better outcome on the SF-36 and HOOS. Fifty-seven pseudotumours were identified in 227 THAs. A revision rate of 19 % was observed.

Conclusions

In conclusion, 35 % of the patients experienced pain after MoM THA. These patients showed significantly higher serum metal ion levels. The patient-reported questionnaires indicated significantly better outcome in patients with cobalt levels ≤5 μg/l.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 9597:1508–1519. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Takenaga RK, Callaghan JJ, Bedard NA, Liu SS, Gao Y (2013) Which functional assessments predict long-term wear after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 8:2586–2594. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-2968-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burroughs BR, Hallstrom B, Golladay GJ, Hoeffel D, Harris WH (2005) Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty 1:11–19. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2004.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldsmith AA, Dowson D, Isaac GH, Lancaster JG (2000) A comparative joint simulator study of the wear of metal-on-metal and alternative material combinations in hip replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 1:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zijlstra WP, van den Akken-Scheek I, Zee MJ, van Raay JJ (2011) No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 12:1771–1776. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1233-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A (2005) Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 3:324–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Innmann MM, Gotterbarm T, Kretzer JP, Merle C, Ewerbeck V, Weiss S et al (2014) Minimum ten-year results of a 28-mm metal-on-metal bearing in cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age and younger. Int Orthop 5:929–934. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2228-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bosker BH, Ettema HB, Boomsma MF, Kollen BJ, Maas M, Verheyen CC (2012) High incidence of pseudotumour formation after large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 6:755–761. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.94B6.28373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prentice JR, Clark MJ, Hoggard N, Morton AC, Tooth C, Paley MN et al (2013) Metal-on-metal hip prostheses and systemic health: a cross-sectional association study 8 years after implantation. PLoS One 6:e66186. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fabi D, Levine B, Paprosky W, Della VC, Sporer S, Klein G et al (2012) Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: causes and high incidence of early failure. Orthopedics 7:e1009–e1016. doi:10.3928/01477447-20120621-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith AJ, Dieppe P, Vernon K, Porter M, Blom AW (2012) Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Lancet 9822:1199–1204. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60353-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meding JB, Meding LK, Keating EM, Berend ME (2012) Low incidence of groin pain and early failure with large metal articulation total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2:388–394. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-2069-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Keurentjes JC, Blane D, Bartley M, Keurentjes JJ, Fiocco M, Nelissen RG (2013) Socio-economic position has no effect on improvement in health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction in total hip and knee replacement: a cohort study. PLoS One 3:e56785. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. de Groot IB, Reijman M, Terwee CB, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Favejee MM, Roos E et al (2009) Validation of the Dutch version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1:132. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2008.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ware JE Jr, Keller SD, Hatoum HT, Kong SX (1999) The SF-36 Arthritis-Specific Health Index (ASHI): I. Development and cross-validation of scoring algorithms. Med Care 5(Suppl):MS40–MS50

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gosens T, Hoefnagels NH, de Vet RC, Dhert WJ, van Langelaan EJ, Bulstra SK et al (2005) The “Oxford Heup Score”: the translation and validation of a questionnaire into Dutch to evaluate the results of total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2:204–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hart AJ, Sabah SA, Bandi AS, Maggiore P, Tarassoli P, Sampson B et al (2011) Sensitivity and specificity of blood cobalt and chromium metal ions for predicting failure of metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 10:1308–1313. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.93B10.26249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Anderson H, Toms AP, Cahir JG, Goodwin RW, Wimhurst J, Nolan JF (2011) Grading the severity of soft tissue changes associated with metal-on-metal hip replacements: reliability of an MR grading system. Skeletal Radiol 3:303–307. doi:10.1007/s00256-010-1000-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hauptfleisch J, Pandit H, Grammatopoulos G, Gill HS, Murray DW, Ostlere S (2012) A MRI classification of periprosthetic soft tissue masses (pseudotumours) associated with metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol 2:149–155. doi:10.1007/s00256-011-1329-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lavigne M, Laffosse JM, Ganapathi M, Girard J, Vendittoli P (2011) Residual groin pain at a minimum of two years after metal-on-metal THA with a twenty-eight-millimeter femoral head, THA with a large-diameter femoral head, and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:93–98. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.01711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nikolajsen L, Brandsborg B, Lucht U, Jensen TS, Kehlet H (2006) Chronic pain following total hip arthroplasty: a nationwide questionnaire study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 4:495–500. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00976.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hart AJ, Sabah S, Henckel J, Lewis A, Cobb J, Sampson B et al (2009) The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 6:738–744. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.21682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM (2003) Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)—validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord:10. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-4-10

  24. van der Weegen W, Smolders JM, Sijbesma T, Hoekstra HJ, Brakel K, van Susante JL (2012) High incidence of pseudotumours after hip resurfacing even in low risk patients; results from an intensified MRI screening protocol. Hip Int:0. doi:10.5301/hipint.5000004

  25. Keegan GM, Learmonth ID, Case CP (2008) A systematic comparison of the actual, potential, and theoretical health effects of cobalt and chromium exposures from industry and surgical implants. Crit Rev Toxicol 8:645–674. doi:10.1080/10408440701845534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zeng Y, Feng W, Li J, Lu L, Ma C, Zeng J et al (2014) A prospective study concerning the relationship between metal allergy and post-operative pain following total hip and knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2367-1

    Google Scholar 

  27. Australian Orthopaedic Association (2012) Hip and knee arthroplasty. Australian National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide. Available at: https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/annual-reports-2012

  28. National Joint Registry for England, Wales and North Ireland (2014). Available at: www.njrcentre.org.uk

  29. Wimmer MA, Fischer A, Buscher R, Pourzal R, Sprecher C, Hauert R et al (2010) Wear mechanisms in metal-on-metal bearings: the importance of tribochemical reaction layers. J Orthop Res 4:436–443. doi:10.1002/jor.21020

    Google Scholar 

  30. Langton DJ, Sidaginamale R, Lord JK, Nargol AV, Joyce TJ (2012) Taper junction failure in large-diameter metal-on-metal bearings. Bone Joint Res 4:56–63. doi:10.1302/2046-3758.14.2000047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kretzer JP, Jakubowitz E, Krachler M, Thomsen M, Heisel C (2009) Metal release and corrosion effects of modular neck total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 6:1531–1536. doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0729-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like thank Ben Heggelman radiologist at the Meander Medical Centre.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Christiaan Smeekes, Ron Wolterbeek, Jan-Ferdinand Henseler & Rob Nelissen

  2. Department of Orthopaedics, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands

    Christiaan Smeekes, Bastiaan Ongkiehong & Bart van der Wal

Authors
  1. Christiaan Smeekes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bastiaan Ongkiehong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bart van der Wal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ron Wolterbeek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jan-Ferdinand Henseler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rob Nelissen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christiaan Smeekes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smeekes, C., Ongkiehong, B., van der Wal, B. et al. Large fixed-size metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: higher serum metal ion levels in patients with pain. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 631–638 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2605-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2605-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation