Skip to main content
Log in

The use of buttress plates in the management of acetabular fractures with quadrilateral plate involvement: is it still a valid option?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The primary aim of this study was to report on the mid-term outcomes after quadrilateral plate reconstruction of acetabular fractures using a buttress/spring plate through an ilioinguinal approach.

Methods

Between 2003 and 2011, 30 adult patients (25 males) with mean age 54 years (range 17–80) who underwent surgical fixation for an acetabular fracture and had minimum follow up of 24 months (mean 46.2, range 24–78.6) were retrospectively reviewed. Standard demographics, admission and hospitalization data (concomitant injuries, number of operative procedures, time to operating theatre, early and late complications) were correlated to the clinical (Harris Hip Score) and radiological (Matta Reduction Score and Matta Arthritis Score) outcome.

Results

Three patients underwent a Total Hip Replacement. Functional score was excellent in 17 (56.6 %), good in 4 (13.3 %), fair in 6 (20 %) and poor in 3 (10 %) cases. Surgery-related complications included two patients with temporary lateral femoral cutaneous palsy and three with heterotopic ossification. The quality of the postoperative reduction was associated to Harris Hip Score (p = 0.015) and postoperative arthritis (p = 0.010). Strong association was evident between age and both post-operative reduction (p = 0.010) and arthritis (p = 0.014). The presence of quadrilateral plate comminution and gull-sign were associated to poor post-operative reduction (p = 0.016) and low Harris Hip Score (p = 0.049) respectively.

Conclusion

Quadrilateral plate reconstruction with a buttress plate though the ilioinguinal approach remains a valid method of fixation in acetabular surgery. Additional studies are needed to compare the efficiency of this method to new surgical approaches and fixation implants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. White G, Kanakaris NK, Faour O, Valverde JA, Martin MA, Giannoudis PV (2013) Quadrilateral plate fractures of the acetabulum: an update. Injury 44:159–167. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Prasartritha T, Chaivanichsiri P (2013) The study of broken quadrilateral surface in fractures of the acetabulum. Int Orthop 37:1127–1134. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-1845-1

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E (1964) Fractures of the Acetabulum: Classification and Surgical Approaches for Open Reduction. Preliminary Report. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 46:1615–1646

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnes SN, Stewart MJ (1976) Central fractures of the acetabulum: a critical analysis and review of literature. Clin Orthop 114:276–281

  5. Qureshi AA, Archdeacon MT, Jenkins MA, Infante A, DiPasquale T, Bolhofner BR (2004) Infrapectineal plating for acetabular fractures: a technical adjunct to internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma 18:175–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Laflamme GY, Hebert-Davies J, Rouleau D, Benoit B, Leduc S (2011) Internal fixation of osteopenic acetabular fractures involving the quadrilateral plate. Injury 42:1130–1134. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Park MS, Yoon SJ, Park JH, Choi SM (2013) The management of the displaced medial wall in complex acetabular fractures using plates and additional cerclage. Hip Int: J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther 23:323–329. doi:10.5301/hipint.5000027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bastian JD, Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Keel MJ (2013) Mid-term results in relation to age and analysis of predictive factors after fixation of acetabular fractures using the modified Stoppa approach. Injury 44:1793–1798. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Letournel E (2006) Fractures of the acetabulum: a study of a series of 75 cases – Les fractures du cotyle, etude d'une serie de 75 cas. J de Chirurgie 82:47-87, 1961. (Translated and substantially abridged). J Orthop Trauma 20:S15–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Anglen JO, Burd TA, Hendricks KJ, Harrison P (2003) The "Gull Sign": a harbinger of failure for internal fixation of geriatric acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma 17:625–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Daurka JS, Pastides PS, Lewis A, Rickman M, Bircher MD (2014) Acetabular fractures in patients aged > 55 years: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J 96-B:157–163. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.96B2.32979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Matta JM, Mehne DK, Roffi R (1986) Fractures of the acetabulum. Early results of a prospective study. Clinical orthopaedics and related research:241-250

  13. Matta JM (1996) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 78:1632–1645

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 51:737–755

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Archdeacon MT, Kazemi N, Collinge C, Budde B, Schnell S (2013) Treatment of protrusio fractures of the acetabulum in patients 70 years and older. J Orthop Trauma 27:256–261. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e318269126f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim JW, Herbert B, Hao J, Min W, Ziran BH, Mauffrey C (2015) Acetabular fractures in elderly patients: a comparative study of low-energy versus high-energy injuries. Int Orthop 39:1175–1179. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2711-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Letournel EJR (1993) Fractures of the Acetabulum. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith WR ZB, Morgan SJ (2007) Fractures of the Pelvis and Acetabulum. Informa Healthcare; 2007, New York

  19. Olson SA RM (eds) (2006) Acetabular and Pelvic Fractures. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont IL

  20. Zinghi GF e (2004) Fractures of the Pelvis and Acetabulum. . Thieme, New York

  21. Marintschev I, Gras F, Schwarz CE, Pohlemann T, Hofmann GO, Culemann U (2012) Biomechanical comparison of different acetabular plate systems and constructs–the role of an infra-acetabular screw placement and use of locking plates. Injury 43:470–474. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.11.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Culemann U, Marintschev I, Gras F, Pohlemann T (2011) Infra-acetabular corridor–technical tip for an additional screw placement to increase the fixation strength of acetabular fractures. J Trauma 70:244–246. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f45f91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tile M (1995) Fractures of pelvis and acetabulum. Williams & Wilkins

  24. Mast JJR, Ganz R (1989) Planning and reduction techniques in fracture surgery. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Abo-Elsoud M, Radwan YA, Gobba M, Sadek F (2014) Short-segment fixation through a limited ilioinguinal approach for treating anterior acetabular fractures: a historical-control study. Int Orthop 38:1469–1475. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2354-6

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Farid YR (2010) Cerclage wire-plate composite for fixation of quadrilateral plate fractures of the acetabulum: a checkrein and pulley technique. J Orthop Trauma 24:323–328. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c90bbe

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu Y, Yang H, Li X, Yang SH, Lin JH (2013) Newly modified Stoppa approach for acetabular fractures. Int Orthop 37:1347–1353. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-1920-7

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Keel MJ, Ecker TM, Cullmann JL, Bergmann M, Bonel HM, Buchler L, Siebenrock KA, Bastian JD (2012) The Pararectus approach for anterior intrapelvic management of acetabular fractures: an anatomical study and clinical evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol 94:405–411. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.94B3.27801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Keel MJ, Ecker TM, Siebenrock KA, Bastian JD (2012) Rationales for the Bernese approaches in acetabular surgery. Eur J Trauma Emergency Surg 38:489–498. doi:10.1007/s00068-012-0229-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sen RK, Tripathy SK, Aggarwal S, Goyal T, Mahapatra SK (2013) Comminuted quadrilateral plate fracture fixation through the iliofemoral approach. Injury 44:266–273. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2012.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Taller S, Sram J, Lukas R, Endrych L, Dzupa V (2014) Fixation of acetabular fractures. a novel method of pre-operative Omega plate contouring. Acta Chirurg Orthop Traumatol Cech 81:212–220

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sram J, Taller S, Lukas R, Endrych L (2013) Use of the Omega plate for stabilisation of acetabular fractures: first experience. Acta Chirurg Orthop Traumatol Cech 80:118–124

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in relation to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter V. Giannoudis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tosounidis, T.H., Gudipati, S., Panteli, M. et al. The use of buttress plates in the management of acetabular fractures with quadrilateral plate involvement: is it still a valid option?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 2219–2226 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2883-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2883-7

Keywords

Navigation