Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The study of broken quadrilateral surface in fractures of the acetabulum

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Three-dimensional computerised tomography (3DCT) can provide comprehensive patho-anatomy of complex bone on a single image. Though important, the key articular quadrilateral [Q] surface has not been a part of the systems developed for classifying acetabulum fractures. The purpose of the study was to simplify the complexity of classification by the direct sign of the broken Q surface which lies opposite the entire floor of the acetabulum.

Methods

The study reviewed 84 acetabular fractures using 3DCT images of the interior lateral view (IL) taken between June 2002 to December 2009. Fractures were traditionally classified using the anatomical disruption, plane of the fracture line breaking through or not through the bone column described by Judet and Letournel.

Results

The 3D images clearly show the primary site of impaction acting on the acetabulum and the whole course of fracture. The image could not illustrate disruption of the lips of acetabulum and congruity of hip joints in 20 cases of wall (W) fracture. There were 30 transverse (T) fractures classified when the acetabulum was divided horizontally from front to back into upper and lower parts and 34 cases of column (C) fracture when the main vertical lines run and collide along the anterior and posterior column.

Conclusions

This study showed that the well-known complex fractures can be satisfactorily classified with the broad flat inner plane of the Q surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dorland (1994) Dorland’s Illustrated medical dictionary, 28th edition. Saunders, Philadelphia

  2. Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E (1964) Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction, preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 46:1615–1646

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. AO Foundation (2008) A short history of pelvic trauma surgery. http://www.ao-asif.ch/portal/AOFileServer/PortalFiles?FilePath=/Extranet2007/Active/_att//wor/act/Dialogue/2003_2/History_pelvic_trauma.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2008

  4. Letournel E, Judet R (1993) Fractures of the acetabulum, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Werner CM, Copeland CE, Ruckstuhl T, Stromberg J, Turen CH, Bouaicha S (2012) Acetabular fracture types vary with different acetabular version. Int Orthop 36:2559–2563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun BH, Li KH, Zhu Y (2011) Comment on Sen et al.: posterior wall reconstruction using iliac crest strut graft in severely comminuted posterior acetabular wall fracture. Int Orthop 35:1903–1904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sen RK, Tripathy SK, Aggarwal S, Tamuk T (2011) Posterior wall reconstruction using iliac crest strut graft in severely comminuted posterior acetabular wall fracture. Int Orthop 35:1223–1228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vrahas MS, Tile M (2001) Fractures of the acetabulum. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD (eds) Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults, vol 2, 5th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1513–1545

    Google Scholar 

  9. Matta JM (2002) Surgical treatment of acetabular fractures. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB (eds) Skeletal trauma, volume1, 3rd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1109–1149

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brandser E (2002) The pelvis. In: Rogers LF (ed) Radiology of skeletal trauma, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 930–1029

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rice J, Kaliszer M, Dolan M, Cox M, Khan H, McElwain JP (2002) Comparison between clinical and radiologic outcome measures after reconstruction of acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma 16:82–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Saks BJ (1986) Normal acetabular anatomy for acetabular fracture assessment: CT and plain film correlation. Radiology 159:139–145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Harris JH, Coupe KJ, Lee JS, Trotscher T (2005) Acetabular fractures revisited: a new CT-based classification. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 9:150–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harris JH Jr, Coupe KJ, Lee JS, Trotscher T (2004) Acetabular fractures revisited: part 2, a new CT-based classification. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1367–1375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Durkee NJ, Jacobson J, Jamadar D, Karunakar MA, Morag Y, Hayes C (2006) Classification of common acetabular fractures: radiographic and CT appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:915–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harley JD, Mack LA, Winquist RA (1982) CT of acetabular fractures: comparison with conventional radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 138:413–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Potok PS, Hopper KD, Umlauf MJ (1995) Fractures of the acetabulum: imaging, classification, and understanding. Radiographics 15:7–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Burk DL Jr, Mears DC, Kennedy WH, Cooperstein LA, Herbert DL (1985) Three-dimensional computed tomography of acetabular fractures. Radiology 155:183–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pozzi Mucelli RS, Muner G, Pozzi Mucelli F, Pozzi Mucelli M, Marotti F, Dalla Palma L (1986) Three-dimensional computed tomography of the acetabulum. Eur J Radiol 6:168–177

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fishman EK, Magid D, Ney DR, Chaney EL, Pizer SM, Rosenman JG, Levin DN, Vannier MW, Kuhlman JE, Robertson DD (1991) Three-dimensional imaging. Radiology 181:321–337

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. White MS (1991) Three-dimensional computed tomography in the assessment of fractures of the acetabulum. Injury 22:13–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Martinez CR, Di Pasquale TG, Helfet DL, Graham AW, Sanders RW, Ray LD (1992) Evaluation of acetabular fractures with two- and three-dimensional CT. Radiographics 12:227–242

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Guy RL, Butler-Manuel PA, Holder P, Brueton RN (1992) The role of 3D CT in the assessment of acetabular fractures. Br J Radiol 65:384–389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gautsch TL, Johnson EE, Seeger LL (1994) True three dimensional stereographic display of 3D reconstructed CT scans of the pelvis and acetabulum. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:138–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haveri M, Junila J, Suramo I, Lähde S (1998) Multiplanar and 3D CT of acetabular fractures. Acta Radiol 39:257–264

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kickuth R, Laufer U, Hartung G, Gruening C, Stueckle C, Kirchner J (2002) 3D CT versus axial helical CT versus conventional tomography in the classification of acetabular fractures: a ROC analysis. Clin Radiol 57:140–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pretorius ES, Fishman EK (1999) Volume-rendered three-dimensional spiral CT: musculoskeletal applications. Radiographics 19:1143–1160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Attias N, Lindsey RW, Starr AJ, Borer D, Bridges K, Hipp JA (2005) The use of a virtual three-dimensional model to evaluate the intraosseous space available for percutaneous screw fixation of acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1520–1523

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brandser E, Marsh JL (1998) Acetabular fractures: easier classification with a systematic approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1217–1228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Giannoudis PV, Grotz MR, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H (2005) Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:2–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Laird A, Keating JF (2005) Acetabular fractures: a 16-year prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:969–973

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Matta JM (2003) Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:1704–1709

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Visutipol B, Chobtangsin P, Ketmalasiri B, Pattarabanjird N, Varodompun N (2000) Evaluation of Letournel and Judet classification of acetabular fracture with plain radiographs and three-dimensional computerized tomographic scan. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 8:33–37

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kumar A, Shah NA, Kershaw SA, Clayson AD (2005) Operative management of acetabular fractures. A review of 73 fractures. Injury 36:605–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Brown GA, Willis MC, Firoozbakhsh K, Barmada A, Tessman CL, Montgomery A (2000) Computed tomography image-guided surgery in complex acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 370:219–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Brown GA, Firoozbakhsh K, Gehlert RJ (2001) Three-dimensional CT modeling versus traditional radiology techniques in treatment of acetabular fractures. Iowa Orthop J21:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cimerman M, Kristan A (2007) Preoperative planning in pelvic and acetabular surgery: the value of advanced computerised planning modules. Injury 38:442–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vannier MW, Hildebolt CF, Gilula LA, Pilgram TK, Mann F, Monsees BS, Murphy WA, Totty WG, Offutt CJ (1991) Calcaneal and pelvic fractures: diagnostic evaluation by three-dimensional computed tomography scans. J Digit Imaging 4:143–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen KN, Wang G, Cao LG, Zhang MC (2009) Differences of percutaneous retrograde screw fixation of anterior column acetabular fractures between male and female: a study of 164 virtual three-dimensional models. Injury 40:1067–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pascarella R, Digennaro V, Grandi G (2011) Osteochondral impaction of the posterior acetabular surface without cortical fracture of any wall or column: an undescribed pattern of acetabular injury. J Orthop Traumatol 12:101–105

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ohashi K, El-Khoury GY, Abu-Zahra KW, Berbaum KS (2006) Interobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification with multidetector CT: are standard Judet radiographs necessary? Radiology 241:386–391

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center of Excellence in Orthopaedics, Lerdsin General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand

    Thavat Prasartritha & Paskorn Chaivanichsiri

Authors
  1. Thavat Prasartritha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paskorn Chaivanichsiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thavat Prasartritha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prasartritha, T., Chaivanichsiri, P. The study of broken quadrilateral surface in fractures of the acetabulum. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 1127–1134 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1845-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1845-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation