Abstract
A major application of three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) is in the imaging of the skeleton. 3D CT has a potentially important role in determining the presence, type, and extent of fractures, especially of the calcaneus and pelvis. The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 3D CT, CT slices, and plain radiography in the detection and characterization of calcaneal and pelvic fractures. 3D CT reconstructions were obtained by two methods, surface reconstruction and volumetric techniques. Twenty-eight patients were imaged with CT, 3D CT, and plain radiography. The opinion of a musculoskeletal radiologist with access to all images plus clinical history, surgical findings, and follow-up findings was taken as truth. Four additional musculoskeletal radiologists read these cases in a blinded fashion and ranked the modalities with regard to perceived utility. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the relative value of each modality in terms of diagnostic quality. All imaging modalities performed comparably in the diagnosis of fractures. CT slices and plain-films were the most useful for more difficult diagnostic tasks such as fracture stability, and the presence of comminution and estimation of the number of fragments. The results suggest that for skeletal areas with complicated anatomy (such as the pelvis and calcaneus), the diagnostic value of 3D CT is often equivalent to that of conventional methods.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Totty WG, Vannier MW: Complex musculoskeletal anatomy: Analysis using three dimensional surface reconstruction. Radiology 150:173–177, 1984
Fishman EK, Drebin RA, Magid D: Volumetric rendering techniques: Applications for 3-dimensional imaging of the hip. Radiology 163:737–738, 1987
Fishman EK, Magid D, Ney DR, et al: Three dimensional imaging in orthopedics: State of the art 1988. Orthopedics 11:1021–1026, 1988
Fishman EK, Magid D, Ney DR, et al: Three-dimensional imaging and display of musculoskeletal anatomy. Jour Comp Asst Tomogr 12:465–467, 1988
Vannier MW, Marsh JL, Warren JO: Three dimensional CT reconstruction images for craniofacial surgical planning and evaluation: Radiology 150:179–184, 1984
Drebin RA, Carpenter LA, Hanrahan P:Volumetric rendering. Computer Graphics 22:65–74, 1988
Trivedi SS: Volumetric imaging for medical applications. Cemax Inc, 1987
Vannier MW, Hildebolt CF, Marsh JL, et al: Craniosynostosis: Diagnostic value of three-dimensional CT reconstruction. Radiology 173:669–673, 1989
Pilgram TK, Vannier MW, Hildebolt CF, et al: Craniosynostosis: Image quality, confidence, and correctness in diagnosis. Radiology 173:675–679, 1989
Metz CE: ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 21:720–733, 1986
Metz CE: Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nuc Med 8:283–298, 1987
Swets JA: ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. Invest Radiology 14:109–121, 1979
McNeil BJ, Hanley JA: Statistical approaches to clinical predictions. N Engl J Med 304:1292–1294, 1981
McNeil BJ, Hanley JA: Statistcal approaches to the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Med Dec Making 4:137–150, 1984
Swets JA: Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: Implications for theory and measurement of performance. Psychol Bulletin 99(2):181–198, 1986
Getty DJ, Pickett RM, D’Orsi CJ, et al: Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. Invest Radiol 23:240–252, 1988
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating chracteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839–843, 1983
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: Maximum attainable discrimination and the utilization of radiologic examinations. J Chron Dis 35:601–611, 1982
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36, 1982
Metz CE, Wang DL, Kronman HB: A new approach for listing the significance of differences between ROC curves measured from correlated data, in: Deconink F (ed): Information Processing in Medical Imaging. The Hague, Nijhoff, 432–445, 1984
Metz CE: Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radilogical ROC studies. Invest Radiol 24:234–245, 1989
Swets JA, Pickett RM: Evaluation of diagnostic systems. New York, NY, Academic Press, 1982
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported in part by Phillips Medical Systems, Inc, under the Pegasus project.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vannier, M.W., Hildebolt, C.F., Gilula, L.A. et al. Calcaneal and pelvic fractures: Diagnostic evaluation by three-dimensional computed tomography scans. J Digit Imaging 4, 143–152 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168159
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168159