Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Outcomes of anterior and posterior instrumentation under different surgical procedures for treating thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis in adults

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

There are few articles in the literature comparing outcomes between anterior and posterior instrumentation in the management of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis (TB).

Methods

Between January 2004 and December 2009, 217 adult patients, average age 39 (range 16–67) years with thoracic and lumbar spinal TB were treated by anterior radical debridement and fusion plus instrumentation, anterior radical debridement with fusion and posterior fusion with instrumentation, posterolateral debridement and fusion plus posterior instrumentation or transpedicular debridement and posterior fusion with instrumentation in a single- or two-stage procedure. We followed up 165 patients for 22–72 (mean 37) months. Of these, 138 underwent more than three weeks chemotherapy with isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol, and the remaining 27 underwent operation for neurological impairment within six to 18 hours of the same chemotherapy regimen. In no case did relapse occur. Apart from eight patients with skip lesions treated by hybrid anterior and posterior instrumentation, anterior instrumentation was used in 74 patients (group A) and 83 patients (group B) were fixed posteriorly.

Results

In both groups, local symptoms were relieved significantly one to three weeks postoperatively; ten of 14 patients (71%) in group A and 14 of 19 (74%) in group B with neurological deficit had excellent or good clinical results (P > 0.05). Erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESR) returned from 43.6 mm/h and 42.7 mm/h, respectively, preoperatively to normal levels eight to 12 weeks postoperatively. Kyphosis degree was corrected by a mean of 11.5° in group A and 12.6° in group B, respectively (P < 0.01). Correction loss was 6.8° in group A and 6.1° in group B at the last follow-up (P < 0.01). Fusion rates of the grafting bone were 92.5% and 91.8%, respectively, at final follow-up (P > 0.05). Severe complications did not occur.

Conclusion

These results suggest that both anterior and posterior instrumentation attain good results for correction of the deformity and maintaining correction, foci clearance, spinal-cord decompression and pain relief in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal TB providing that the opeartive indication is accurately identified. However, the posterior approach may be superior to anterior instrumentation to correct deformity and maintain that correction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nagashima H, Yamane K, Nishi T et al (2010) Recent trends in spinal infections: retrospective analysis of patients treated during the past 50 years. Int Orthop 34:395–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jin D, Dongbin Qu, Chen J et al (2004) One-stage anterior interbody autografting and instrumentation in primary surgical management of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis. Eur Spine J 13:114–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Swanson AN, Pappou IP, Cammisa FP et al (2006) Chronic infections of the spine: surgical indications and treatments. Clin Orthop Relat Res 444:100–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang Qi-Shan, Zheng C, Yuezheng Hu et al (2009) One-stage surgical management for children with spinal tuberculosis by anterior decompression and posterior instrumentation. Int Orthop 33:1385–1390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rajasekaran S, Shanmugasundaram TK (1987) Prediction of the angle of gibbus deformity in tuberculosis of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:503–508

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Karaeminogullari O, Aydinli U, Ozerdemoglu R et al (2007) Tuberculosis of the Lumbar Spine: Outcomes After Combined Treatment of Two-drug Therapy and Surgery. Orthopedics 30(1):55–59

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim BJ, Ko HS, Lim Y et al (1993) The clinical study of the tuberculous spondylitis. J Korean Orthop Assoc 28:2221–2232

    Google Scholar 

  8. Benli IT, Kıs M, Akalın S et al (2000) The results of anterior radical debridement and anterior instrumentation in Pott’s disease and comparison with other surgical techniques. Kobe J Med Sci 46:39–68

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Faraj AA (2001) Anterior instrumentation for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis (letter). J Bone Joint Surg Am 83A:463

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oga M, Arizono T, Takasita M et al (1993) Evaluation of the risk of instrumentation as a foreign body in the spinal tuberculosis: clinical and biologic study. Spine 18:1890–1894

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee TC, Lu K, Yang LC et al (1999) Transpedicular instrumentation as an adjunct in the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine tuberculosis with early stage bone destruction. J Neurosurg 91:163–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen YC, Chang MC, Wang ST et al (2003) One-stage posterior surgery for treatment of advanced spinal tuberculosis. J Chin Med Assoc 66:411–417

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yilmaz C, Selek HY, Gurkan I et al (1997) Anterior instrumentation for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81A:1261–1267

    Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Sebai MW, Al-Khawashki H, Al-Arabi K et al (2001) Operative treatment of progressive deformity in spinal tuberculosis. Int Orthop 25:322–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee Sun-Ho, Sung J-K, Park Y-M (2006) Single-stage Transpedicular Decompression and Posterior Instrumentation in Treatment of Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Spinal Tuberculosis (A Retrospective Case Series). J Spinal Disord Tech 19:595–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Broner FA, Garland DE, Zigler JE (1996) Spinal infection in the immunocompromised host. Orthop Clin North Am 27:37–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Altman GT, Altman DT, Frankovitch KF (1996) Anterior and posterior fusion for children with tuberculosis of the spine. Clin Orthop 325:225–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Talu U, Gogus A, Ozturk C (2006) The role of posterior instrumentation and fusion after anterior radical debridement and fusion in the surgical treatment of spinal tuberculosis: experience of 127 cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:554–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Issack PS, Boachie-Adjei O (2011) Surgical correction of kyphotic deformity in spinal tuberculosis. Int Orthop Jun 15 (Epub ahead of print) - doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1292-9

  20. Jain Ak, Jain S (2011) Instrumented stabilization in spinal tuberculosis. Int Orthop Jul 1, (Epub ahead of print) - doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1296-5

  21. Wang Z, Ge Z, Jin W et al (2007) Treatment of spinal tuberculosis with ultrashort-course chemotherapy in conjunction with partial excision of pathologic vertebrae. Spine J 7:671–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Güven O, Kumano K, Yalcin S et al (1994) A single stage posterior approach and rigid fixation for preventing kyphosis in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis. Spine 19:1039–1043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Domanic U, Hamzaoglu A, Sar C, Yavuzer Y (1993) Posterior fusion and instrumentation after anterior radical debridement and fusion in the surgical treatment of Pott’s disease. J Turkish Spine Surg 4:16–19

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moon MS, Woo YK, Lee KS et al (1995) Posterior instrumentation and anterior interbody fusion for tuberculous kyphosis of dorsal and lumbar spines. Spine 20:1910–1916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen WJ, Wu CC, Jung CH, Chen LH et al (2002) Combined anterior and posterior surgeries in the treatment of spinal tuberculous spondylitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 398:50–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Teoman Benli İ, Acaroğlu E, Akalin S et al (2003) Anterior radical debridement and anterior instrumentation in tuberculosis spondylitis. Eur Spine J 12:224–234

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao J, Lian XF, Hou TS et al (2007) Anterior debridement and bone grafting of spinal tuberculosis with one-stage instrumentation anteriorly or posteriorly. Int Orthop 31:859–863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim KS, Ko SH, Youm KS et al (1998) Anterior spinal instrumentation in treatment of spinal tuberculosis. J Korean Orthop Assoc 33:1560–1568

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, The 309th hospital of PLA, Beijing, China

    Yuan Zheng Ma, Xu Cui, Hong Wei Li, Xing Chen, Xiao Jun Cai & Yi Bing Bai

Authors
  1. Yuan Zheng Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xu Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hong Wei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xing Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiao Jun Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yi Bing Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xu Cui.

Additional information

The Co-first authors are Yuan Zheng Ma and Xu Cui

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, Y.Z., Cui, X., Li, H.W. et al. Outcomes of anterior and posterior instrumentation under different surgical procedures for treating thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis in adults. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 36, 299–305 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1390-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1390-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation