Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors influencing the accuracy of iliosacral screw placement in trauma patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Correct placement of iliosacral screws remains a surgical challenge. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify parameters which impact the accuracy of this technically demanding procedure. Eighty-two patients with vertically unstable pelvic injuries treated with a total of 147 iliosacral screws were included. Assessment of postoperative CT scans revealed screw misplacement in 13 cases (8%), of which six occurred following insertion of two unilateral screws into S1. Six screw misplacements occurred in patients with dislocation injuries of the posterior pelvis. Comparison of a navigated and the standard technique revealed a decreased screw misplacement rate in the navigated group (15% standard vs. 3% navigation, p < 0.05). In addition, the malposition rate was influenced by the surgeon’s individual experience (20% for low vs. 3.9% for high volume surgeons, p < 0.05). Overall, the accuracy of iliosacral screw placement depends on the number of screws inserted into S1 and the extent of dislocation. In experienced hands, the use of navigation represents a helpful tool to improve the placement accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gebhard F, Weidner A, Liener UC, Stockle U, Arand M (2004) Navigation at the spine. Injury 35(Suppl 1):35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Merloz P, Tonetti J, Pittet L, Coulomb M, Lavallee S, Troccaz J et al (1998) Computer-assisted spine surgery. Comput Aided Surg 3(6):297–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Laine T, Schlenzka D, Makitalo K, Tallroth K, Nolte LP, Visarius H (1997) Improved accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer-assisted surgery. A prospective clinical trial of 30 patients. Spine 22(11):1254–1258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, Lohikoski J, Schlenzka D (2000) Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 9(3):235–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Briem D, Linhart W, Lehmann W, Begemann PG, Adam G, Schumacher U et al (2006) Computer-assisted screw insertion into the first sacral vertebra using a three-dimensional image intensifier: results of a controlled experimental investigation. Eur Spine J 15(6):757–763

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grützner PA, Rose E, Vock B, Holz F, Nolte LP, Wentzensen A (2002) Computer-assisted screw osteosynthesis of the posterior pelvic ring. Initial experiences with an image reconstruction based optoelectronic navigation system. Unfallchirurg 105(3):254–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stockle U, Krettek C, Pohlemann T, Messmer P (2004) Clinical applications—pelvis. Injury 35(Suppl 1):46–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Matta JM, Saucedo T (1989) Internal fixation of pelvic ring fractures. Clin Ortop 242:83–97

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tonetti J, Carrat L, Blendea S, Merloz P, Troccaz J, Lavallee S et al (2001) Clinical results of percutaneous pelvic surgery. Computer assisted surgery using ultrasound compared to standard fluoroscopy. Comput Aided Surg 6(4):204–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gautier E, Bachler R, Heini PF, Nolte LP (2001) Accuracy of computer-guided screw fixation of the sacroiliac joint. Clin Ortop 393:310–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stockle U, Konig B, Hofstetter R, Nolte LP, Haas NP (2001) Navigation assisted by image conversion. An experimental study on pelvic screw fixation. Unfallchirurg 104(3):215–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hinsche AF, Giannoudis PV, Smith RM (2002) Fluoroscopy-based multiplanar image guidance for insertion of sacroiliac screws. Clin Ortop 395:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT, Mills WJ (1997) Iliosacral screw fixation: early complications of the percutaneous technique. J Orthop Trauma 11(8):584–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Templeman D, Goulet J, Duwelius PJ, Olson S, Davidson M (1996) Internal fixation of displaced fractures of the sacrum. Clin Ortop 329:180–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arand M, Kinzl L, Gebhard F (2002) Sources of error and risks in CT based navigation. Orthopade 31(4):378–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reilly MC, Bono CM, Litkouhi B, Sirkin M, Behrens FF (2003) The effect of sacral fracture malreduction on the safe placement of iliosacral screws. J Orthop Trauma 17(2):88–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Biyani A, Nadaud MC (1997) Morphologic considerations of the first sacral pedicle for iliosacral screw placement. Spine 22(8):841–846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Arand M, Kinzl L, Gebhard F (2004) Computer-guidance in percutaneous screw stabilization of the iliosacral joint. Clin Ortop 422:201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schep NW, Haverlag R, van Vugt AB (2004) Computer-assisted versus conventional surgery for insertion of 96 cannulated iliosacral screws in patients with postpartum pelvic pain. J Trauma 57(6):1299–1302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stockle U, Konig B, Dahne M, Raschke M, Haas NP (2002) Computer assisted pelvic and acetabular surgery. Clinical experiences and indications. Unfallchirurg 105(10):886–892

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tonetti J, Carrat L, Blendea S, Troccaz J, Merloz LS et al (2001) Clinical validation of computer assisted pelvic surgery using ultrasound. A percutaneous safe technique with low radiation exposure. Stud Health Technol Inform 81:515–520

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Briem D, Linhart W, Bock T, Begemann PGC, Halata Z, Rueger JM, Windolf J (2006) Computer-assisted screw placement into the posterior pelvic ring: assessment of different navigated procedures in a cadaver trial. Unfallchirurg 109(8):640–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hufner T, Geerling J, Gansslen A, Kendoff D, Citak C, Grutzner P, Krettek C (2004) Computer-assisted surgery for pelvic injuries. Chirurg 75(10):961–966

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Konrad G, Zwingmann J, Kotter E, Südkamp N, Oberst M (2010) Variability of the screw position after 3D-navigated sacroiliac screw fixation. Influence of the surgeon's experience with the navigation technique. Unfallchirurg 113(1):29–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Grossterlinden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grossterlinden, L., Rueger, J., Catala-Lehnen, P. et al. Factors influencing the accuracy of iliosacral screw placement in trauma patients. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 35, 1391–1396 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1092-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1092-7

Keywords

Navigation