Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does computer-assisted surgery benefit leg length restoration in total hip replacement? Navigation versus conventional freehand

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leg length discrepancy following total hip replacement (THR) can contribute to poor hip function. Abnormal gait, pain, neurological disturbance and patient dissatisfaction have all been described as a result of leg length inequality after THR. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of computer navigation in THR can improve limb length restoration and early clinical outcomes. We performed a matched-pair study comparing 48 computer-assisted THR with 48 THRs performed using a traditional freehand alignment method. The same implant with a straight non-modular femoral stem was used in all cases. The navigation system used allowed the surgeon to monitor both acetabular cup placement and all the phases of femoral stem implantation including rasping. Patients were matched for age, sex, arthritis level, pre-operative diagnosis and pre-operative leg length discrepancy. At a minimum follow-up of six months, limb length discrepancy was measured using digital radiographs and a standardised protocol. The number of patients with a residual discrepancy of 10 mm or more and/or a post-operative over-lengthening were measured. The clinical outcome was evaluated using both the Harris Hip Score and the normalised Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Arthritis Index. Restoration of limb length was significantly better in the computer-assisted THR group. The number of patients with a residual limb length discrepancy greater than 10 mm and/or a post-operative over-lengthening was significantly lower. No significant difference in the Harris Hip Score or normalised WOMAC Arthritis Index was seen between the two groups. The surgical time was significantly longer in the computer-assisted THR group. No post-operative dislocations were seen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrak RL (2003) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11:89–99

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bellamy N (2002) WOMAC: a 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported health status questionnaire. J Rheumatol 29:2473–2476

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Braun A, Lazovic D, Zigan R (2007) Modular short-stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty: implant positioning and the influence of navigation. Orthopedics 30(10 Suppl):S148–S152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark CR, Huddleston HD, Schoch EP 3rd, Thomas BJ (2006) Leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14(1):38–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Montironi F, Pullen C (2008) Leg length discrepancy, dislocation rate, and offset in total hip replacement using a short modular stem: navigation vs conventional freehand. Orthopedics 31(10 Suppl 1):pii:orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=35541

  6. Crowe JF, Mani VJ, Ranawat CS (1979) Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61(1):15–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gandhi R, Marchie A, Farrokhyar F, Mahomed N (2009) Computer navigation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 33(3):593–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gofton JP (1971) Studies in osteoarthritis of the hip. IV. Biomechanics and clinical considerations. Can Med Assoc J 104(11):1007–1011

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Haaker RGA, Tiedjen K, Ottersbach A, Rubenthaler F, Stockheim M, Stiehl JB (2007) Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion. J Arthroplasty 22(2):151–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie SA, Vollset SE (2000) The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 71:337–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalteis T, Handel M, Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Grifka J (2006) Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation?. J Bone Joint Surg 88(2):163–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Baethis H, Grifka J (2005) Greater accuracy in positioning of the acetabular cup by using an image-free navigation system. Int Orthop 29(5):272–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Konyves A, Bannister GC (2005) The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(2):155–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jenny JY, Boeri C, Dosch JC, Uscatu M, Ciobanu E (2009) Navigated non-image-based positioning of the acetabulum during total hip replacement. Int Orthop 33(1):83–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lazovic D, Kaib N (2005) Results with navigated bicontact total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 28(10 Suppl):S1227–S1233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lazovic D, Zigan R (2006) Navigation of short-stem implants. Orthopedics 29(10 Suppl):S125–S129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mainard D (2008) Navigated and nonnavigated total hip arthroplasty: results of two consecutive series using a cementless straight hip stem. Orthopedics 31(10 Suppl 1): pii:orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=35528

  19. Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD (2007) Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1832–1842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Matsuda K, Nakamura S, Matsushita T (2006) A simple method to minimize limb-length discrepancy after hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 77(3):375–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nogler M, Kessler O, Prassl A, Donnely B, Streicher R, Sledge JB, Krismer M (2004) Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:159–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lakshmanan P, Ahmed SM, Hansford RG, Woodnutt DJ (2008) Achieving the required medial offset and limb length in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 74:49–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Paratte S, Argenson JN (2007) Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(3):494–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Bissett GA, Rothman RH, Hozack WJ (2003) Surgical treatment of limb-length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(12):2310–2317

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Renkawitz T, Sendtner E, Grifka J, Kalteis J (2008) Accuracy of imageless stem navigation during simulated total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 79(6):785–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Renkawitz T, Schuster T, Herold T, Goessmann H, Sendtner E, Grifka J, Kalteis J (2009) Measuring leg length and offset with an imageless navigation system during total hip arthroplasty: is it really accurate? Int J Med Robot 5(2):192–197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. `Rubash HE, Parvataneni HK (2007) The pants too short, the leg too long: leg length inequality after THA. Orthopedics 30:764–765

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sarin VK, Pratt WR, Bradley GW (2005) Accurate femur repositioning is critical during intraoperative total hip arthroplasty length and offset assessment. J Arthroplasty 20(7):887–891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sathappan SS, Teicher ML, Capeci C, Yoon M, Wasserman BR, Jaffe WL (2007) Clinical outcome of total hip arthroplasty using the normalized and proportionalized femoral stem with a minimum 20-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 22(3):356–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shiramizu K, Naito M, Shitama T, Nakamura Y, Shitama H (2004) L-shaped caliper for limb length measurement during total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:966–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Takigami I, Itokazu M, Itoh Y, Mtasumoto K, Yamamoto T, Shimizu K (2008) Limb-length measurement in total hip arthroplasty using a calipers dual pin retractor. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 66(2):107–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. White TO, Dougall TW (2002) Arthroplasty of the hip. Leg length is not important. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(3):335–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wixson RL (2008) Computer-assisted total hip navigation. Instr Course Lect 57:707–720

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wylde V, Whitehouse SL, Taylor AH, Pattison GT, Bannister GC, Blom AW (2009) Prevalence and functional impact of patient-perceived leg length discrepancy after hip replacement. Int Orthop 33(4):905–909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ist Orthopedic Department, C.T.O. Hospital, Via Bignami 1, 20100, Milan, Italy

    Alfonso Manzotti & Norberto Confalonieri

  2. Bioengineering Department, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy

    Pietro Cerveri & Elena De Momi

  3. Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Chris Pullen

  4. Via S.Pertini 21, 20040, Cambiago, Milan, Italy

    Alfonso Manzotti

Authors
  1. Alfonso Manzotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pietro Cerveri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elena De Momi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chris Pullen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Norberto Confalonieri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfonso Manzotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manzotti, A., Cerveri, P., De Momi, E. et al. Does computer-assisted surgery benefit leg length restoration in total hip replacement? Navigation versus conventional freehand. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 35, 19–24 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0903-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0903-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation