Skip to main content
Log in

Hip arthroplasty for failed treatment of proximal femoral fractures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Failed treatment of an intertrochanteric fracture typically leads to profound functional disability and pain. Salvage treatment with hip arthroplasty may be considered. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results and complications of hip arthroplasty performed as a salvage procedure after the failed treatment of an intertrochanteric hip fracture. Twenty-one patients were treated in our hospital with hip arthroplasty for failed treatment of intertrochanteric hip fracture. There were sixteen women and five men with a mean age of 75.8 years (range 61–85 years). Fourteen patients had failure of a previous nail fixation procedure, five had failure of a plate fixation, one of hip screws fixation and one of Ender nail fixation. In 19 out of 21 patients we performed a total hip arthroplasty—14 cases used modular implants with long-stems and five cases used a standard straight stem. In 2 of 21 cases we used a bipolar hemiarthroplasty. A statistically significant improvement was found comparing pre and postoperative conditions (p < 0.05). Our experience confirms that total hip arthroplasty is a satisfactory salvage procedure after failed treatment of an intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients with few serious orthopaedic complications and acceptable clinical outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lorich DG, Geller DS, Nielson JH (2004) Osteoporotic pertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:398–410

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kyle RF (1994) Fractures of the proximal part of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 76-A:924–950

    Google Scholar 

  3. McKinley JC, Robinson CM (2002) Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fracture with total hip arthroplasty: comparison of primary arthroplasty with early salvage arthroplasty after failed internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:2010–2015

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anglen JO, Weinstein JN (2008) Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:700–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Haidukewych GJ, Berry DJ (2003) Hip arthroplasty for salvage of failed treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 85:899–905

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu-Yao GL, Keller RB, Wennwburg JE (1994) Outcome after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:15–25

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeffrey O, Anglen JN (2008) Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fracture: changing pattern of practice. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:700–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stea S, Bordini B, De Clerico M, Petropulacos K, Toni A (2009) First hip arthroplasty register in Italy: 55000 cases and 7 years follow-up. Int Orthop 33:339–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stoffelen D, Haentjens P, Reynders P, Casteleyen PP, Broos P, Opdecam P (1998) Hip arthroplasty for failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures in the elderly patient. Acta Orthop Trauma Surg 117:193–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sarathy MP, Madhavan P, Ravichandran KM (1995) Nonunion of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. Treatment by modified medial displacement and valgus osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:90–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hentjens P, Castelejens PP, Opdecam P (1994) Hip arthroplasty for failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures in the elderly patient. Acta Orthop Trauma Surg 113:222–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tabsh I, Waddell JP, Morton J (1997) Total hip arthroplasty for complications of proximal femoral fractures. J Orthop Trauma 11:166–169

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64-B(1):17–19

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parker MJ (1993) Valgus reduction of trochanteric fractures. Injury 24:313–316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vandershot P, Vanderspeeten K, Verheyen L (1995) A review of 161 subtrochanteric fractures risk factors influencing out-come: age, fracture pattern and fracture level. Unfallchirurg 89:265–271

    Google Scholar 

  17. Palm H, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Gebuhr P (2007) Integrity of the lateral femoral wall in intertrochanteric hip fractures: an important predictor of a reoperation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:470–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mehlhoff T, Landon GC, Tullos HS (1991) Total hip arthroplasty for complications of intertrochanteric fractures. Clin Orthop 269:32–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mouzopoulos G, Stamatakos M, Arabatzi H, Vasiliadis G, Batanis G, Tsembeli A, Tzurbakis M, Safioleas M (2008) The four-year functional result after a displaced subcapital hip fracture treated with three different surgical options. Int Orthop (SICOT) 32:367–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the publication of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dario Perugia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

D’Arrigo, C., Perugia, D., Carcangiu, A. et al. Hip arthroplasty for failed treatment of proximal femoral fractures. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 34, 939–942 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0834-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0834-x

Keywords

Navigation