Skip to main content
Log in

Distal femoral tumours treated by resection and custom mega-prosthetic replacement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have analysed the results of 246 cases of distal femoral tumours treated by resection and prosthetic replacement between 1988 and 2002. Patient ages ranged from 6–67 years averaging 24 years; 133 were males. The most common tumour was osteosarcoma (67% of patients). The follow-up ranged from 2 to 14 years. Stage II tumours were seen in 72% of patients. The technique of sleeve resection of the quadriceps musculature was followed to achieve local clearance of the tumour. The prosthesis used was a rotating hinge custom mega-prosthesis manufactured locally. The functional result achieved was excellent or good in 87%; 86% of the patients had no evidence of disease, and 13% had died. The 10-year patient survival was 76.9%. Periprosthetic fracture and infection were the most common complications.

Résumé

Nous avons analysé les résultats de 246 cas de tumeurs fémorales distales traitées par résection et remplacement prothétique entre 1988 et 2002. L’âges des malades s’étendait de 6 à 67 ans avec une moyenne de 24 ans. Cent trente trois étaient des hommes. La tumeur la plus fréquente était l’ostéosarcome (67% des malades). Le suivi était de 2 à 14 années. Des tumeurs de stade II étaient présentes chez 72% des malades. La technique de résection a été conduite pour faire une ablation complète de la tumeur. La prothèse qui a été utilisée était une méga prothèse à charnière rotatoire fabriqué localement. Le résultat fonctionnel obtenu était excellent ou bon dans 87%. Quatre-vingt-six pourcent des malades n’avait pas d’évidence de maladie et 13% étaient morts. La survie à dix ans était de 76,9%. Les fractures périprothétiques et l’infection étaient les complications les plus fréquentes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abudu A, Carter SR, Grimer RJ (1996) The outcome and functional results of diaphyseal endoprosthesis after tumour excision. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:652–657

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benedetti MG, Catani F, Donati D, Simoncini L, Giannini S (2000) Muscle performance about the knee joint in patients who had distal femoral replacement after resection of a bone tumor. An objective study with use of gait analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1619–1625

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blunn GW, Wait ME (1991) Remodelling of bone around intramedullary stems in growing patients. J Orthop Res 9:809–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cannon SR (1997) Massive prosthesis for malignant bone tumours of the limbs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:497–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eckardt JJ, Yang RS, Ward WG, Kelly C, Eilber FR (1995) Endoprosthetic reconstruction for malignant bone tumours and non-malignant tumorous conditions of bone. Adv Oper Orthop 3:61–83, Mosby-Yearbook

    Google Scholar 

  6. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawer M, Pritchard DJ (1993) A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumours of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop 286:241–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Enneking WF (1986) A system of staging musculoskeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop 204:9–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hillmann A, Hoffmann C, Gosheger G, Krakau H, Winkelmann W (1999) Malignant tumour of the distal part of the femur or the proximal part of the tibia; endoprosthetic replacement or rotationplsty. Functional outcome and quality of life measurements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:462–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Horowitz SM, Glasser DB, Lane JM, Healey JH (1993) Prosthetic and extremity survivorship after limb salvage for sarcoma. How long do the reconstructions last? Clin Orthop 293:280–286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ilyas I, Kurar A, Moreau PG, Younge D (2001) Modular megaprosthesis for distal femoral tumours. Int Orthop 25:375–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bickels J, Witting JC, Kollender Y, Henshaw R, Kellar-Graney KL, Meller I, Malawer MM (2002) Distal femur resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction-a long term follow up study. Clin Orthop 400:225–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kawai A, Healey JH, Boland PJ, Athanasian EA, Jeon DG (1999) A rotating-hinge knee replacement for malignant tumors of the femur and tibia. J Arthroplast 14:187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawai A, Lin PP, Boland PJ, Athanasian EA, Healey JH (1999) Relationship between magnitude of resection, complication, and prosthetic survival after prosthetic knee reconstructions for distal femoral tumors. J Surg Oncol 70:109–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Malo M, Davis AM, Wunder J, Masri BA, Bell RS, Isler MH, Turcotte RE (2001) Functional evaluation in distal femoral endoprosthetic replacement for bone sarcoma. Clin Orthop 389:173–180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Natarajan MV, Sivaseelam A, Rajkumar G, Jaheer Hussain SH (2003) Custom mega prosthetic replacement for proximal tibial tumours. Int Orthop 27:334–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mittermayer F, Krepler P, Dominkus M, Schwameis E, Sluga M, Heinzl H, Kotz R (2001) Long-term follow up of uncemented tumor endoprostheses for the lower extremity. Clin Orthop 388:167–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts P, Chan D, Grimer RJ, Sneath RS, Scales JT (1991) Prosthetic replacement of the distal femur for primary bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:762–769

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Unwin PS, Cannon SR, Grimer RJ, Kemp KBS, Sneath RS, Walker PS (1996) Aseptic loosening in cemented custom—made replacements for bone tumours of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:5–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van Krieken FM, den Heeten GJ, Pedersen DR, Brand RA, Crowninshield RD (1985) Prediction of muscle and joint loads after segmental femur replacement for osteosarcoma. Clin Orthop 198:273–283

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wunder JS, Leitch K, Griffin AM, Davis AM, Bell RS (2001) Comparison of two methods of reconstruction for primary malignant tumours at the knee: a sequential cohort study. J Surg Oncol 77:89–99, discussion 100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yaw KM, Gebhart MC, Mankin HJ (1989) Chemotherapy effect on the clinical results of allograft transplantation in the treatment of malignant bone tumours. In Langlais F, Tomeno B (eds). Limb salvage: major reconstructions in oncologic and nontumoral conditions. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 107–115

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mayil Vahanan Natarajan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Natarajan, M.V., Sivaseelam, A., Ayyappan, S. et al. Distal femoral tumours treated by resection and custom mega-prosthetic replacement. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 29, 309–313 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0677-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0677-z

Keywords

Navigation