Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of anti-tumoral effect of M1 phenotype induction in macrophages by miR-130 and miR-33 containing exosomes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 05 December 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

In the tumor microenvironment, macrophages polarize into the M2 phenotype to facilitate tumorigenesis. Tumor-derived exosomes can act as mediators between the tumor microenvironment and stromal cells by transporting proteins, mRNAs, and miRNAs. Exosomal miRNAs play a pivotal role in modulating tumor microenvironment and macrophage polarization. Here, we overexpressed miR-130 and miR-33 in exosomes of MDA-MB-231 cells and investigated their effect on macrophage polarization and tumor progression. For this purpose, exosomes were extracted from MDA-MB-231 cells and characterized using dynamic light scattering, electron microscopy, and western blotting of exosomal markers. Then, miR-130 or miR-33 containing exosomes were used to treat IL4-induced M2 or tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). After treatment, the polarization status of macrophages, including the expression of M1 specific genes, and the secretion of cytokines were evaluated. Finally, the conditioned medium from exosome-treated macrophages was incubated with cancer cells to evaluate its effect on the migration and invasion ability of cancer cells and, in vivo experiments investigated the effect of exosome-treated macrophages on breast cancer progression. Exosomes characterization results approved the range of size and homogeneity of extracted exosomes. Overexpression of miR-130 and miR-33 in exosomes increased the expression of M1 signature genes (IRF5, MCP1, CD80) and secretion of cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) as well as yeast phagocytic activity of macrophages. Besides, the conditioned medium of macrophages treated with miRNA containing exosomes declined the migration and invasion ability of cancer cells. The in vivo results indicated the inhibitory effect of exosome-treated macrophages on tumor growth. Furthermore, the results showed that in response to exosome-treated macrophages, the production of TNF-α by spleen cells increased, while the production of IL-10 and TGF-β by these cells decreased. These findings suggest that overexpression of miR-130 and miR-33 in exosomes can decrease tumor progression by shifting macrophage polarization from M2 to M1 phenotype and can be a potential therapeutic strategy for tumor interventions.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2019) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 69(1):7–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Frediani JN, Fabbri M (2016) Essential role of miRNAs in orchestrating the biology of the tumor microenvironment. Mol Cancer 15(1):42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mantovani A, Allavena P (2015) The interaction of anticancer therapies with tumor-associated macrophages. J Exp Med 212(4):435–445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chanmee T, Ontong P, Konno K, Itano N (2014) Tumor-associated macrophages as major players in the tumor microenvironment. Cancers 6(3):1670–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng H, Wang Z, Fu L, Xu T (2019) Macrophage polarization in the development and progression of ovarian cancers: an overview. Front Oncol 9:421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Franklin RA, Liao W, Sarkar A, Kim MV, Bivona MR, Liu K, Pamer EG, Li MO (2014) The cellular and molecular origin of tumor-associated macrophages. Science 344(6186):921–925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fraternale A, Brundu S, Magnani M (2015) Polarization and repolarization of macrophages. J Clin Cell Immunol 6(319):2

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heusinkveld M, van der Burg SH (2011) Identification and manipulation of tumor associated macrophages in human cancers. J Transl Med 9(1):216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Colombo N, Peccatori F, Paganin C, Bini S, Brandely M, Mangioni C, Mantovani A, Allavena P (1992) Anti-tumor and immunomodulatory activity of intraperitoneal IFN-γ in ovarian carcinoma patients with minimal residual tumor after chemotherapy. Int J Cancer 51(1):42–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Y-C, He F, Feng F, Liu X-W, Dong G-Y, Qin H-Y, Hu X-B, Zheng M-H, Liang L, Feng L (2010) Notch signaling determines the M1 versus M2 polarization of macrophages in antitumor immune responses. Can Res 70(12):4840–4849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Connell RM, Taganov KD, Boldin MP, Cheng G, Baltimore D (2007) MicroRNA-155 is induced during the macrophage inflammatory response. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(5):1604–1609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chaudhuri AA, So AY-L, Sinha N, Gibson WS, Taganov KD, O’Connell RM, Baltimore D (2011) MicroRNA-125b potentiates macrophage activation. J Immunol 187(10):5062–5068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ponomarev ED, Veremeyko T, Barteneva N, Krichevsky AM, Weiner HL (2011) MicroRNA-124 promotes microglia quiescence and suppresses EAE by deactivating macrophages via the C/EBP-α–PU. 1 pathway. Nat Med 17(1):64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Su S, Zhao Q, He C, Huang D, Liu J, Chen F, Chen J, Liao J-Y, Cui X, Zeng Y (2015) miR-142-5p and miR-130a-3p are regulated by IL-4 and IL-13 and control profibrogenic macrophage program. Nat Commun 6:8523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim H (2017) The transcription factor MafB promotes anti-inflammatory M2 polarization and cholesterol efflux in macrophages. Scie Rep 7(1):7591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li I, Nabet BY (2019) Exosomes in the tumor microenvironment as mediators of cancer therapy resistance. Mol Cancer 18(1):32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kowal J, Tkach M, Théry C (2014) Biogenesis and secretion of exosomes. Curr Opin Cell Biol 29:116–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kooijmans SA, Vader P, van Dommelen SM, van Solinge WW, Schiffelers RM (2012) Exosome mimetics: a novel class of drug delivery systems. Int J Nanomed 7:1525

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Berthold F (1981) Isolation of human monocytes by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation. Blut 43(6):367–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kia V, Paryan M, Mortazavi Y, Biglari A, Mohammadi-Yeganeh S (2019) Evaluation of exosomal miR-9 and miR-155 targeting PTEN and DUSP14 in highly metastatic breast cancer and their effect on low metastatic cells. J Cell Biochem 120(4):5666–5676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang B, Zhang Y, Yao G, Gao J, Yang B, Zhao Y, Rao Z, Gao J (2012) M2-polarized macrophages promote metastatic behavior of Lewis lung carcinoma cells by inducing vascular endothelial growth factor-C expression. Clinics 67(8):901–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Poh AR, Ernst M (2018) Targeting macrophages in cancer: from bench to bedside. Front Oncol 8:49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dandekar RC, Kingaonkar AV, Dhabekar GS (2011) Role of macrophages in malignancy. Ann Maxillofac Surg 1(2):150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li H, Jiang T, Li M-Q, Zheng X-L, Zhao G-J (2018) Transcriptional regulation of macrophages polarization by MicroRNAs. Front Immunol 9

  25. Biswas SK, Mantovani A (2010) Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm. Nat Immunol 11(10):889–896. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.1937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tikhanovich I, Zhao J, Olson J, Adams A, Taylor R, Bridges B, Marshall L, Roberts B, Weinman SA (2017) Protein arginine methyltransferase 1 modulates innate immune responses through regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ-dependent macrophage differentiation. J Biol Chem 292(17):6882–6894

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Luo W, Xu Q, Wang Q, Wu H, Hua J (2017) Effect of modulation of PPAR-γ activity on Kupffer cells M1/M2 polarization in the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Scie Rep 7:44612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bouhlel MA, Derudas B, Rigamonti E, Dièvart R, Brozek J, Haulon S, Zawadzki C, Jude B, Torpier G, Marx N (2007) PPARγ activation primes human monocytes into alternative M2 macrophages with anti-inflammatory properties. Cell Metab 6(2):137–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kelly LM, Englmeier U, Lafon I, Sieweke MH, Graf T (2000) MafB is an inducer of monocytic differentiation. EMBO J 19(9):1987–1997

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ha D, Yang N, Nadithe V (2016) Exosomes as therapeutic drug carriers and delivery vehicles across biological membranes: current perspectives and future challenges. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 6(4):287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jiang X-C, Gao J-Q (2017) Exosomes as novel bio-carriers for gene and drug delivery. Int J Pharm 521(1–2):167–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Z, Xu L, Hu Y, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Zheng X, Wang S, Wang Y, Yu Y, Zhang M (2016) miRNA let-7b modulates macrophage polarization and enhances tumor-associated macrophages to promote angiogenesis and mobility in prostate cancer. Scie Rep 6:25602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sakuishi K, Apetoh L, Sullivan JM, Blazar BR, Kuchroo VK, Anderson AC (2010) Targeting Tim-3 and PD-1 pathways to reverse T cell exhaustion and restore anti-tumor immunity. J Exp Med 207(10):2187–2194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ying X, Wu Q, Wu X, Zhu Q, Wang X, Jiang L, Chen X, Wang X (2016) Epithelial ovarian cancer-secreted exosomal miR-222-3p induces polarization of tumor-associated macrophages. Oncotarget 7(28):43076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Su M-J (2016) Pancreatic cancer cell exosomes-mediated macrophage reprogramming and the role of MicroRNA transfection using nanoparticle delivery system. Northeastern University

  36. Trivedi M, Talekar M, Shah P, Ouyang Q, Amiji M (2016) Modification of tumor cell exosome content by transfection with wt-p53 and microRNA-125b expressing plasmid DNA and its effect on macrophage polarization. Oncogenesis 5(8):e250. https://doi.org/10.1038/oncsis.2016.52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lin L, Lin H, Wang L, Wang B, Hao X, Shi Y (2015) miR-130a regulates macrophage polarization and is associated with non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Rep 34(6):3088–3096

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Goenka S, Kaplan MH (2011) Transcriptional regulation by STAT6. Immunol Res 50(1):87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lawrence T, Natoli G (2011) Transcriptional regulation of macrophage polarization: enabling diversity with identity. Nat Rev Immunol 11(11):750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ouimet M, Ediriweera HN, Gundra UM, Sheedy FJ, Ramkhelawon B, Hutchison SB, Rinehold K, van Solingen C, Fullerton MD, Cecchini K (2015) MicroRNA-33–dependent regulation of macrophage metabolism directs immune cell polarization in atherosclerosis. J Clin Investig 125(12):4334–4348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Van den Bossche J, Baardman J, de Winther MP (2015) Metabolic characterization of polarized M1 and M2 bone marrow-derived macrophages using real-time extracellular flux analysis. JoVE (J Visualized Exp) 105:e53424

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cheng S-C, Scicluna BP, Arts RJ, Gresnigt MS, Lachmandas E, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Kox M, Manjeri GR, Wagenaars JA, Cremer OL (2016) Broad defects in the energy metabolism of leukocytes underlie immunoparalysis in sepsis. Nat Immunol 17(4):406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Van den Bossche J, O’Neill LA, Menon D (2017) Macrophage immunometabolism: where are we (going)? Trends Immunol 38(6):395–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Vijayan V, Pradhan P, Braud L, Fuchs HR, Gueler F, Motterlini R, Foresti R, Immenschuh S (2019) Human and murine macrophages exhibit differential metabolic responses to lipopolysaccharide-A divergent role for glycolysis. Redox Biol 22:101147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project is funded by the National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD, Contact grant No: 957819) and Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Contact grant No: 10309).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Samira Mohammadi-Yeganeh or Seyed Mahmoud Hashemi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: Funding information was missing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moradi-Chaleshtori, M., Bandehpour, M., Soudi, S. et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of anti-tumoral effect of M1 phenotype induction in macrophages by miR-130 and miR-33 containing exosomes. Cancer Immunol Immunother 70, 1323–1339 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-020-02762-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-020-02762-x

Keywords

Navigation