Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cross-sectional imaging of nodal metastases in the abdomen and pelvis

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate nodal staging is important for the management of patients with abdominal and pelvic malignancies. Local and nodal staging using cross-sectional imaging can influence treatment planning. The measurement of nodal size is still the most widely used criteria for discriminating between benign and malignant nodes. However, knowledge of the pathways of nodal spread, the treatment history, and careful analysis of nodal characteristics can improve nodal assessment. An appreciation of normal structures that may simulate nodal disease is also important. The potential for further improving nodal staging accuracy by positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance lymphography is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 16.
Fig. 17.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tiguert R, Gheiler EL, Tefilli MV, et al. (1999) Lymph node size does not correlate with the presence of prostate cancer metastasis. Urology 53:367–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lucey BC, Stuhlfaut JW, Soto JA (2005) Mesenteric lymph nodes: detection and significance on MDCT. AJR 184:41–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, et al. (2003) Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology 227:371–377

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jager GJ, Barentsz JO, Oosterhof GO, Witjes JA, Ruijs SJ (1996) Pelvic adenopathy in prostatic and urinary bladder carcinoma: MR imaging with a three-dimensional TI-weighted magnetization-prepared-rapid gradient-echo sequence. AJR 167:1503–1507

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dorfman RE, Alpern MB, Gross BH, Sandler MA (1991) Upper abdominal lymph nodes: criteria for normal size determined with CT. Radiology 180:319–322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Magnusson A (1983) Size of normal retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 24:315–318

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Einstein DM, Singer AA, Chilcote WA, Desai RK (1991) Abdominal lymphadenopathy: spectrum of CT findings. Radiographics 11:457–472

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vinnicombe SJ, Norman AR, Nicolson V, Husband JE (1995) Normal pelvic lymph nodes: evaluation with CT after bipedal lymphangiography. Radiology 194:349–355

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Peters PE, Beyer K (1985) [Normal lymph node cross sections in different anatomic regions and their significance for computed tomographic diagnosis]. Radiologe 25:193–198

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Balfe DM, Mauro MA, Koehler RE, et al. (1984) Gastrohepatic ligament: normal and pathologic CT anatomy. Radiology 150:485–490

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grey AC, Carrington BM, Hulse PA, Swindell R, Yates W (2000) Magnetic resonance appearance of normal inguinal nodes. Clin Radiol 55:124–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zirinsky K, Auh YH, Rubenstein WA, Kneeland JB, Whalen JP, Kazam E (1985) The portacaval space: CT with MR correlation. Radiology 156:453–460

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bundrick WS, Culkin DJ, Mata JA, Zitman RI, Venable DD (1993) Evaluation of the current incidence of nodal metastasis from prostate cancer. J Surg Oncol 52:269–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Neal AJ, Dearnaley DP (1993) Prostate cancer: pelvic nodes revisited–sites, incidence and prospects for treatment with radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 5:309–312

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Spencer J, Golding S (1992) CT evaluation of lymph node status at presentation of prostatic carcinoma. Br J Radiol 65:199–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sakuragi N, Satoh C, Takeda N, et al. (1999) Incidence and distribution pattern of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with Stages IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy. Cancer 85:1547–1554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sohn KM, Lee JM, Lee SY, Ahn BY, Park SM, Kim KM (2000) Comparing MR imaging and CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma. AJR 174:1551–1557

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Newcombe RG, Dallimore NS, Bourne MW, Williams GT (2003) Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg 90:355–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nicolai N, Miceli R, Artusi R, Piva L, Pizzocaro G, Salvioni R (2004) A simple model for predicting nodal metastasis in patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors undergoing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection only. J Urol 171:172–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marks LB, Rutgers JL, Shipley WU, et al. (1990) Testicular seminoma: clinical and pathological features that may predict para-aortic lymph node metastases. J Urol 143:524–527

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Partin AW, Mangold LA, Lamm DM, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, Pearson JD (2001) Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin tables) for the new millennium. Urology 58:843–848

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Golimbu M, Morales P, Al-Askari S, Brown J (1979) Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostatic cancer. J Urol 121:617–620

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Park JM, Charnsangavej C, Yoshimitsu K, Herron DH, Robinson TJ, Wallace S (1994) Pathways of nodal metastasis from pelvic tumors: CT demonstration. Radiographics 14:1309–1321

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chintapalli KN, Esola CC, Chopra S, Ghiatas AA, Dodd GD 3rd (1997) Pericolic mesenteric lymph nodes: an aid in distinguishing diverticulitis from cancer of the colon. AJR 169:1253–1255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Efremidis SC, Vougiouklis N, Zafiriadou E, et al. (1999) Pathways of lymph node involvement in upper abdominal malignancies: evaluation with high-resolution CT. Eur Radiol 9:868–874

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Koh DM, Husband JE (2003) Pattern of disease recurrence of bladder carcinoma following radical cystectomy. Cancer Imaging 3:96–100

    Google Scholar 

  27. Husband JE, MacVicar D (1998) Testicular germ cell tumour. In: Husband JE, Reznek RH (eds). Imaging in oncology. Oxford: ISIS Medical Media, 259–276

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hilton S, Herr HW, Teitcher JB, Begg CB, Castellino RA (1997) CT detection of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in patients with clinical stage I testicular nonseminomatous germ cell cancer: assessment of size and distribution criteria. AJR 169:521–525

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Oyen RH, Van Poppel HP, Ameye FE, Van de Voorde WA, Baert AL, Baert LV (1994) Lymph node staging of localized prostatic carcinoma with CT and CT-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: prospective study of 285 patients. Radiology 190:315–322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Steinkamp HJ, Cornehl M, Hosten N, Pegios W, Vogl T, Felix R (1995) Cervical lymphadenopathy: ratio of long- to short-axis diameter as a predictor of malignancy. Br J Radiol 68:266–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fukuya T, Honda H, Hayashi T, et al. (1995) Lymph-node metastases: efficacy for detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer. Radiology 197:705–711

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lien HH, Lindskold L, Stenwig AE, Ous S, Fossa SD (1987) Shape of retroperitoneal lymph nodes at computed tomography does not correlate to metastatic disease in early stage non-seminomatous testicular tumors. Acta Radiol 28:271–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Roche CJ, Hughes ML, Garvey CJ, et al. (2003) CT and pathologic assessment of prospective nodal staging in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. AJR 180:475–480

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Matsukuma K, Tsukamoto N, Matsuyama T, Ono M, Nakano H (1989) Preoperative CT study of lymph nodes in cervical cancer—its correlation with histological findings. Gynecol Oncol 33:168–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang WT, Lam WW, Yu MY, Cheung TH, Metreweli C (2000) Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. AJR 175:759–766

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Scatarige JC, Fishman EK, Kuhajda FP, Taylor GA, Siegelman SS (1983) Low attenuation nodal metastases in testicular carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 7:682–687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Husband JE, Hawkes DJ, Peckham MJ (1982) CT estimations of mean attenuation values and volume in testicular tumors: a comparison with surgical and histologic findings. Radiology 144:553–558

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Barentsz JO, Jager GJ, van Vierzen PB, et al. (1996) Staging urinary bladder cancer after transurethral biopsy: value of fast dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 201:185–193

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Noworolski SM, Fischbein NJ, Kaplan MJ, et al. (2003) Challenges in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI imaging of cervical lymph nodes to detect metastatic disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 17:455–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Husband JE, Koh DM (2004) Bladder cancer. In: Husband JE, Reznek RH (eds). Imaging in oncology. 2nd ed. London: Taylor and Francis, 343–374

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dooms GC, Hricak H, Moseley ME, Bottles K, Fisher M, Higgins CB (1985) Characterization of lymphadenopathy by magnetic resonance relaxation times: preliminary results. Radiology 155:691–697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim SH, Choi BI, Lee HP, et al. (1990) Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings. Radiology 175:45–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kim SH, Kim SC, Choi BI, Han MC (1994) Uterine cervical carcinoma: evaluation of pelvic lymph node metastasis with MR imaging. Radiology 190:807–811

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Williams AD, Cousins C, Soutter WP, et al. (2001) Detection of pelvic lymph node metastases in gynecologic malignancy: a comparison of CT, MR imaging, and positron emission tomography. AJR 177:343–348

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Fukuda H, Nakagawa T, Shibuya H (1999) Metastases to pelvic lymph nodes from carcinoma in the pelvic cavity: diagnosis using thin-section CT. Clin Radiol 54:237–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Salo JO, Kivisaari L, Rannikko S, Lehtonen T (1986) The value of CT in detecting pelvic lymph node metastases in cases of bladder and prostate carcinoma. Scand J Urol Nephrol 20:261–265

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Subak LL, Hricak H, Powell CB, Azizi L, Stern JL (1995) Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging. Obstet Gynecol 86:43–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Sugiyama T, Nishida T, Ushijima K, et al. (1995) Detection of lymph node metastasis in ovarian carcinoma and uterine corpus carcinoma by preoperative computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. J Obstet Gynaecol 21:551–556

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Teefey SA, Baron RL, Schulte SJ, Shuman WP (1990) Differentiating pelvic veins and enlarged lymph nodes: optimal CT techniques. Radiology 175:683–685

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Gollub MJ, Castellino RA (1996) The cisterna chyli: a potential mimic of retrocrural lymphadenopathy on CT scans. Radiology 199:477–480

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Koh DM, Brown G, Temple L, et al. (2004) Rectal cancer: mesorectal lymph nodes at MR imaging with USPIO versus histopathologic findings—initial observations. Radiology 231:91–99

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bellin MF, Lebleu L, Meric JB (2003) Evaluation of retroperitoneal and pelvic lymph node metastases with MRI and MR lymphangiography. Abdom Imaging 28:155–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Harisinghani MG, Barentsz J, Hahn PF, et al. (2003) Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 348:2491–2499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Deserno WM, Harisinghani MG, Taupitz M, et al. (2004) Urinary bladder cancer: preoperative nodal staging with ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 233:449–456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Harisinghani MG, Saini S, Slater GJ, Schnall MD, Rifkin MD (1997) MR imaging of pelvic lymph nodes in primary pelvic carcinoma with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (Combidex): preliminary observations. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:161–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Reinhardt MJ, Ehritt-Braun C, Vogelgesang D, et al. (2001) Metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: detection with MR imaging and FDG PET. Radiology 218:776–782

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Horowitz NS, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ, et al. (2004) Prospective evaluation of FDG-PET for detecting pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in uterine corpus cancer. Gynecol Oncol 95:546–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hutchings M, Eigtved AI, Specht L (2004) FDG-PET in the clinical management of Hodgkin lymphoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 52:19–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Burton C, Ell P, Linch D (2004) The role of PET imaging in lymphoma. Br J Haematol 126:772–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Huddart RA (2003) Use of FDG-PET in testicular tumours. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 15:123–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Graham RA, Garnsey L, Jessup JM (1990) Local excision of rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 160:306–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Herr HW (1988) Bladder cancer: pelvic lymphadenectomy revisited. J Surg Oncol 37:242–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Lerner SP, Skinner DG, Lieskovsky G, et al. (1993) The rationale for en bloc pelvic lymph node dissection for bladder cancer patients with nodal metastases: long-term results. J Urol 149:758–764, discussion 764–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Academic Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK

    D. M. Koh, M. Hughes & J. E. Husband

Authors
  1. D. M. Koh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Hughes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. E. Husband
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. M. Koh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koh, D.M., Hughes, M. & Husband, J.E. Cross-sectional imaging of nodal metastases in the abdomen and pelvis. Abdom Imaging 31, 632–643 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9022-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9022-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation