Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

MR versus multislice CT cholangiography in evaluating patients with obstruction of the biliary tract

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We compared magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) with multislice computed tomographic (MSCT) cholangiography in the assessment of patients with bile duct obstruction.

Methods

Thirty-six patients with clinical or biochemical signs of biliary obstruction were prospectively studied. MRC was performed with fast spin-echo and single-shot fast spin-echo sequences. Source images, maximum intensity projection, and multiplanar reconstruction were evaluated. MSCT cholangiography was performed without biliary contrast agent, with intravenous injection of 150 mL of iodinated contrast material at 4 mL/s, 2.5-mm slice thickness, 7.5-mm/s table speed, and 1.25-mm reconstruction interval. Axial, multiplanar, and minimum intensity projection reformatted images were evaluated. MRC and MSCT findings were compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP; 20 patients), percutaneous cholangiography (eight patients), intraoperative cholangiography (two patients), surgery (11 patients), and cytology (11 patients) with respect to cause and site of obstruction.

Results

With regard to presence and site of obstruction, agreement was observed across MRC, MSCT cholangiography, and reference investigations in all cases. Concerning cause, the correct diagnosis was made by MSCT cholangiography in 34 of 36 patients. Two cases of common bile duct lithiasis, diagnosed on MRC and ERCP, were missed by MSCT cholangiography.

Conciusion

MSCT cholangiography can be considered a possible noninvasive alternative to MRC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M Greenberg BN Greenberg JM Rubin IM Greenberg (1982) ArticleTitleComputed-tomographic cholangiography Radiology 144 363–368 Occurrence Handle7089291 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL383itlSisQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. RB Jeffrey SuffixJr MP Federle FC Laing et al. (1983) ArticleTitleComputed tomography of choledocholithiasis AJR 140 1179–1183 Occurrence Handle6602489 Occurrence Handle10.2214/ajr.140.6.1179 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL3s3islOjsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. JA Barakos PW Ralls SA Lapin et al. (1987) ArticleTitleCholelithiasis: evaluation with CT Radiology 162 415–418 Occurrence Handle3797654 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2s%2Fpt12rsg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. P Pasanen K Partanen P Pikkarainen et al. (1992) ArticleTitleUltrasonography, CT, and ERCP in the diagnosis of choledochal stones Acta Radiol 33 53–56 Occurrence Handle1731843 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK387hvVGgsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. H-M Klein B Wein S Truong et al. (1993) ArticleTitleComputed tomographic cholangiography using spiral scanning and 3D image processing Br J Radiol 66 762–767 Occurrence Handle8220943 Occurrence Handle10.1259/0007-1285-66-789-762 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FjsF2muw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A Gillams J Gardener R Richards et al. (1994) ArticleTitleThree-dimensional computed tomography cholangiography: a new technique for biliary tract imaging Br J Radiol 67 445–448 Occurrence Handle8193889 Occurrence Handle10.1259/0007-1285-67-797-445 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c3ltFGltQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. BE Beers ParticleVan M Lacrosse JP Trigaux et al. (1994) ArticleTitleNoninvasive imaging of the biliary tree before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: use of three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography AJR 162 1331–1335 Occurrence Handle8191994 Occurrence Handle10.2214/ajr.162.6.8191994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. SM Stockberger JL Wass S Sherman et al. (1994) ArticleTitleIntravenous cholangiography with helical CT: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography Radiology 192 675–680 Occurrence Handle8058932 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2czjs1yksQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. D Fleischmann H Ringl R Schöfl et al. (1996) ArticleTitleThree-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography Radiology 198 861–868 Occurrence Handle8628884 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK287psVWjsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. A-H Kwon S Uetsuji T Ogura Y Kamiyama (1997) ArticleTitleSpiral computer tomography scanning after intravenous infusion cholangiography for biliary duct anomalies Am J Surg 174 396–402 Occurrence Handle9337161 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2svnslSqug%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. JD Neitlich M Topazian RC Smith et al. (1997) ArticleTitleDetection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced helical CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Radiology 203 753–757 Occurrence Handle9169700 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2szhtlSqtA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. JA Soto SM Velez J Guzmàn (1999) ArticleTitleCholedocholitiasis: diagnosis with oral-contrast–enhanced CT cholangiography AJR 172 943–948 Occurrence Handle10587126 Occurrence Handle10.2214/ajr.172.4.10587126 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Flt1Cjuw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. EM Caoili EK Paulson LE Heyneman et al. (2000) ArticleTitleHelical CT cholangiography with three-dimensional volume rendering using an oral biliary contrast agent: feasibility of a novel technique AJR 174 487–492 Occurrence Handle10658729 Occurrence Handle10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740487 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7itFyitA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. F Zandrino L Benzi ML Ferretti et al. (2002) ArticleTitleMultislice CT-cholangiography without biliary contrast agent: technique and preliminary clinical results in the assessment of patients with biliary obstruction Eur Radiol 12 1155–1161 Occurrence Handle11976862 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00330-001-1188-y Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383jvVGntg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. T Schroeder M Malago JF Debatin et al. (2002) ArticleTitleMultidetector computed tomographic cholangiography in the evaluation of potential living liver donors Transplantation 27 1972–1973 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00007890-200206270-00026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S Itoh M Ikeda T Ota et al. (2003) ArticleTitleAssessment of the pancreatic and intrapancreatic bile ducts using 0.5-mm collimation and multiplanar reformatted images in multislice CT Eur Radiol 13 277–285 Occurrence Handle12598991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. AA Stabile Ianora M Memeo A Scardapane et al. (2003) ArticleTitleOral contrast-enhanced three dimensional helical-CT cholangiography: clinical applications Eur Radiol 13 867–873 Occurrence Handle12664128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. TK Kim BS Kim JH Kim et al. (2002) ArticleTitleDiagnosis of intrahepatic stones: superiority of MR cholangiopancreatography over endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography AJR 179 429–434 Occurrence Handle12130445 Occurrence Handle10.2214/ajr.179.2.1790429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. P Pavone A Laghi C Catalano et al. (1999) ArticleTitleMRI of the biliary and pancreatic ducts Eur Radiol 9 1513–1522 Occurrence Handle10525858 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003300050877 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvlslagsA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. DH Pretorius BB Gosink LK Olson (1982) ArticleTitleCT of the opacified biliary tract: use of calcium ipodate AJR 138 1073–1075 Occurrence Handle6979206 Occurrence Handle10.2214/ajr.138.6.1073 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL383gt12ltQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. LJ Jimenéz Cuenca L Olmo Martinez Particledel M Pérez Homs (2001) ArticleTitleHelical CT without contrast in choledocholithiasis diagnosis Eur Radiol 11 197–201 Occurrence Handle11218014 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003300000609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. RK Zemapn PM Berman PM Silverman et al. (1995) ArticleTitleBiliary tract: three dimensional helical CT without cholangiographic contrast material Radiology 196 865–867

    Google Scholar 

  23. V Raptopoulos P Prassopoulos R Chuttani et al. (1998) ArticleTitleMultiplanar CT pancreatography and distal cholangiogra phy with minimum intensity projections Radiology 207 317–324 Occurrence Handle9577475 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3jvVegtA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. P Prassopoulos V Raptopoulos R Chuttani et al. (1998) ArticleTitleDevelopment of virtual CT cholangiopancreatoscopy Radiology 209 570–574 Occurrence Handle9807592 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FisVOhtg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. European Community. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Report EUR 16262. Brussels: European Community, 1998

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera “SS Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo”, Via Venezia 16, Alessandria, 15100, Italy

    F. Zandrino, P. Curone, L. Benzi, M. L. Ferretti & F. Musante

Authors
  1. F. Zandrino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Curone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Benzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. L. Ferretti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. Musante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Zandrino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zandrino, F., Curone, P., Benzi, L. et al. MR versus multislice CT cholangiography in evaluating patients with obstruction of the biliary tract. Abdom Imaging 30, 77–85 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0227-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0227-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation