Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of active idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The different stages in idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (IRF) are generally assessed by assay of inflammatory markers and analysis of contrast-enhanced CT images of the retroperitoneal mass. We investigated the potential role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in this clinical setting.

Methods

18F-FDG uptake was assessed visually and semiquantitatively (using maximum standardized uptake values, SUVmax) in images of the abdominal mass in 22 patients prospectively enrolled from June 2008 to December 2010 who underwent a total of 33 PET/CT studies. The accuracy in discriminating active from inactive disease was calculated assuming as reference a biochemical instrumental evaluation of patients with IRF mostly based on the level of inflammatory indices and contrast enhancement (CE) of the mass at the time of each PET study. In particular, the relationship between SUVmax and CE, the latter calculated from the change in radiodensity (Hounsfield units) between the basal and postcontrast venous portal phases, was evaluated on a three-point scale (0 <20 HU, 1 20–30 HU, 2 ≥30 HU). SUVmax and CE scores were correlated with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. The value of PET/CT in assessing the variation of disease activity over time was also investigated by analysing the changes in metabolic volume (MV) of the retroperitoneal lesion between repeat patient studies.

Results

PET/CT accurately discriminated (93.9 %) active from inactive disease. Significant agreement (p < 0.01) was observed between visual and semiquantitative analysis of 18F-FDG uptake, and CE score. A significant correlation (p < 0.01) was found among SUVmax, CRP levels (rho = 0.54) and ESR (rho = 0.55). Corresponding variations in MV and CE score were observed in patients with multiple studies (p < 0.01; rho = 0.68).

Conclusion

18F-FDG PET/CT may be considered an alternative imaging method for the assessment of different stages of IRF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gilkeson GS, Allen NB. Retroperitoneal fibrosis. A true connective tissue disease. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1996;22:23–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moroni G, Dore R, Collini P. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. J Nephrol. 2005;18:794–808.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Magrey MN, Husni ME, Kushner I, Calabrese LH. Do acute-phase reactants predict response to glucocorticoid therapy in retroperitoneal fibrosis? Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:674–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moroni G, Gallelli B, Banfi G, Sandri S, Messa P, Ponticelli C. Long-term outcome of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis treated with surgical and/or medical approaches. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:2485–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kamper L, Brandt AS, Scharwächter C, Kukuk S, Roth S, Haage P, et al. MR evaluation of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Rofo. 2011;183:721–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Burn PR, Singh S, Barbur S, Boustead G, King CM. Role of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in retroperitoneal fibrosis. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2002;53:168–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yuh WT, Barloon TJ, Sickels WJ, Kramolowsky EV, Williams RD. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. J Urol. 1989;141:602–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cavalcanti Filho JL, de Souza Leão Lima R, de Souza Machado Neto L, Kayat Bittencourt L, Domingues RC, da Fonseca LM. PET/CT and vascular disease: current concepts. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:60–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vaglio A, Greco P, Versari A, Filice A, Cobelli R, Manenti L, et al. Post-treatment residual tissue in idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: active residual disease or silent "scar"? A study using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23:231–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pipitone N, Ghinoi A, Versari A, Vaglio A, Palmisano A, Salvarani C. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Chronic periaortitis. Circulation. 2008;118:1214–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Papathanasiou ND, Du Y, Menezes LJ, Al-Muhaideb A, Shastry M, Beynon H, et al. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in the evaluation of large-vessel vasculitis: diagnostic performance and correlation with clinical and laboratory parameters. Br J Radiol. 2011. doi:10.1259/bjr/16422950.

  12. Nakajo M, Jinnouchi S, Tanabe H, Tateno R, Nakajo M. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography features of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:539–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cronin CG, Lohan DG, Blake MA, Roche C, McCarthy P, Murphy JM. Retroperitoneal fibrosis: a review of clinical features and imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:423–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jansen I, Hendriksz TR, Han SH, Huiskes AW, van Bommel EF. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose position emission tomography (FDG-PET) for monitoring disease activity and treatment response in idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Eur J Intern Med. 2010;21:216–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chander S, Ergun EL, Chugani HT, Chugani DC, Juhasz C, Shields AF, et al. High 2-deoxy-2-18F-fluoro-D-glucose accumulation in a case of retroperitoneal fibrosis following resection of carcinoid tumor. Mol Imaging Biol. 2002;4:363–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vaglio A, Versari A, Fraternali A, Ferrozzi F, Salvarani C, Buzio C. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and follow up of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53:122–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Takahashi M, Momose T, Kameyama M, Ohtomo K. Abnormal accumulation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in the aortic wall related to inflammatory changes: three case reports. Ann Nucl Med. 2006;20:361–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sakamoto A, Okamoto K, Ishizaka N, Tejima K, Hirata Y, Nagai R. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in a case of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Int Heart J. 2006;47:645–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Young PM, Peterson JJ, Calamia KT. Hypermetabolic activity in patients with active retroperitoneal fibrosis on F-18 FDG PET: report of three cases. Ann Nucl Med. 2008;22:87–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Washino S, Hirai M, Matsuzaki A, Kobayashi Y. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for diagnosis and monitoring of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis associated with mediastinal fibrosis. Ann Nucl Med. 2010;24:225–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Palmisano A, Vaglio A. Chronic periaortitis: a fibro-inflammatory disorder. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2009;23:339–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Salvarani C, Pipitone N, Versari A, Vaglio A, Serafini D, Bajocchi G, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET): evaluation of chronic periaortitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53:298–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Castellani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moroni, G., Castellani, M., Balzani, A. et al. The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of active idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39, 1635–1642 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2144-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2144-6

Keywords

Navigation