Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Brain reserve capacity in frontotemporal dementia: a voxel-based 18F-FDG PET study

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The association of the regional cerebral metabolic rate of glucose utilisation (rCMRglc) and years of schooling has been extensively studied in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The results suggest that brain reserve capacity (BRC) allows patients with more years of schooling to cope better with AD pathology. The objective of this study was to provide initial evidence for BRC in frontotemporal dementia (FTD).

Methods

Twenty-nine patients with FTD and 16 healthy age- and education-matched controls underwent PET imaging of the brain with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose. A group comparison of rCMRglc was conducted between patients and controls and the output was saved as region of interest (ROI). A linear regression analysis with education as the independent and rCMRglc as the dependent variable, adjusted for age, gender and total score on the CERAD neuropsychological battery, was conducted in SPM2 over the pre-assigned ROI.

Results

Patients showed a reduced rCMRglc in almost the entire prefrontal cortex and the anterior cingulate cortex as compared with controls (p < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons). The regression analysis revealed a significant negative association between years of schooling and rCMRglc in the bilateral inferior frontal cortex (p < 0.001, uncorrected for multiple comparisons), which was independent of demographic variables and cognitive performance level. There was a strong negative correlation of rCMRglc and education (r = −0.45).

Conclusion

The study provides initial evidence for BRC in FTD. The findings suggest that interindividual differences in educational level affect BRC by partially mediating the relationship between neurodegeneration and the clinical manifestation of FTD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katzman R. Education and the prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1993;43:13–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stern Y, Gurland B, Tatemichi TK, Tang MX, Wilder D, Mayeux R. Influence of education and occupation on the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. JAMA 1994;271:1004–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett DA, Wilson RS, Schneider JA, Evans DA, Mendes de Leon CF, Arnold SE, et al. Education modifies the relation of AD pathology to level of cognitive function in older persons. Neurology 2003;60:1909–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stern Y, Alexander GE, Prohovnik I, Mayeux R. Inverse relationship between education and parietotemporal perfusion deficit in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 1992;32:371–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Perneczky R, Drzezga A, Diehl-Schmid J, Schmid G, Wohlschlager A, Kars S, et al. Schooling mediates brain reserve in Alzheimer’s disease: findings of FDG PET. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:1060–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Scarmeas N, Zarahn E, Anderson KE, Habeck CG, Hilton J, Flynn J, et al. Association of life activities with cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer disease: implications for the cognitive reserve hypothesis. Arch Neurol 2003;60:359–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sundström T. Human brain function evaluated with rCBF-SPECT. Umeo: Faculty of Medicine, Radiation Sciences 2006;78.

  8. Cao Q, Jiang K, Zhang M, Liu Y, Xiao S, Zuo C, et al. Brain glucose metabolism and neuropsychological test in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Chin Med J 2003;116:1235–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Glatt SL, Hubble JP, Lyons K, Paolo A, Troster AI, Hassanein RE, et al. Risk factors for dementia in Parkinson’s disease: effect of education. Neuroepidemiology 1996;15:20–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hodges JR, Davies R, Xuereb J, Kril J, Halliday G. Survival in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2003;61:349–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clinical and neuropathological criteria for frontotemporal dementia. The Lund and Manchester Groups. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:416–8.

  12. Morris JC, Mohs RC, Rogers H, Fillenbaum G, Heyman A. Consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD) clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Psychopharmacol Bull 1988;24:641–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chandler MJ, Lacritz LH, Hynan LS, Barnard HD, Allen G, Deschner M, et al. A total score for the CERAD neuropsychological battery. Neurology 2005;65:102–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards-Lee T, Miller BL, Benson DF, Cummings JL, Russell GL, Boone K, et al. The temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 1997;120 Pt 6:1027–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Drzezga A, Riemenschneider M, Strassner B, Grimmer T, Peller M, Knoll A, et al. Cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with AD and different APOE genotypes. Neurology 2005;64:102–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotactical atlas of the human brain: 3-dimensional proportional system—an approach to cerebral imaging. New York: Thieme Medical; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Perneczky R, Wagenpfeil S, Komossa K, Grimmer T, Diehl J, Kurz A. Mapping scores onto stages: mini-mental state examination and clinical dementia rating. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006;14:139–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Diehl J, Grimmer T, Drzezga A, Riemenschneider M, Forstl H, Kurz A. Cerebral metabolic patterns at early stages of frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia. A PET study. Neurobiol Aging 2004;25:1051–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dennis M, Spiegler BJ, Hetherington R. New survivors for the new millennium: cognitive risk and reserve in adults with childhood brain insults. Brain Cogn 2000;42:102–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Diehl-Schmid J, Grimmer T, Drzezga A, Bornschein S, Riemenschneider M, Forstl H, et al. Decline of cerebral glucose metabolism in frontotemporal dementia: a longitudinal 18F-FDG-PET-study. Neurobiol Aging 2007;28:42–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson JK, Diehl J, Mendez MF, Neuhaus J, Shapira JS, Forman M, et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: demographic characteristics of 353 patients. Arch Neurol 2005;62:925–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partly funded by the Federal Ministry of Research and Education as part of a national collaboration on dementia (Kompetenznetz Demenzen), grant N° 01GI0420 and the Komission für Klinische Forschung, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, grant N° 8765. The sponsors played no role in the design and conduct of the study; the collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; or the preparation, review and approval of the manuscript. The authors do not report any conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Perneczky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perneczky, R., Diehl-Schmid, J., Drzezga, A. et al. Brain reserve capacity in frontotemporal dementia: a voxel-based 18F-FDG PET study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34, 1082–1087 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0323-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0323-z

Keywords

Navigation