Abstract
Purpose
Scintigraphy with maltotriose-[123I]Tyr3-octreotate ([123I]Mtr-TOCA) is compared with [111In]DTPA-Phe1-octreotide ([111In]OC) to assess the differences in pharmacokinetics and imaging properties as well as to estimate the therapeutic potential of the corresponding [131I]Mtr-TOCA.
Methods
Six patients with somatostatin receptor (sstr)-positive tumours were assessed using a dual-head gamma camera. After injection of 137±28 MBq [123I]Mtr-TOCA, dynamic data acquisition of the upper abdomen (30 min) was performed followed by whole-body scans at 0.5 h, 1 h, 3 h and 20 h as well as by SPECT imaging (tumour) at 2 h. [111In]OC scintigraphy was performed by acquiring whole-body scans (4 h, 24 h) and SPECT (24 h). Using a region of interest (ROI) method, tissue and tumour bound activity was assessed and dosimetry performed.
Results
[123I]Mtr-TOCA shows rapid tumour uptake. Up to 4 h, tumour/organ (tu/org) ratios are stable and generally higher than with [111In]OC. From 3 h to 20 h, tu/org ratios increase for spleen, remain stable for liver and decrease significantly for all other tissues. In contrast, with [111In]OC, tu/org ratios decrease slightly between 4 h and 24 h for liver, spleen and kidney and increase for all other tissues. On [123I]Mtr-TOCA scintigraphy, a total of 27 lesions are detected, whereas 33 lesions are detected on [111In]OC scintigraphy (p=0.50). Effective patient absorbed dose is 1.9±0.9 mSv per 100 MBq [123I]Mtr-TOCA.
Conclusion
Compared with [111In]OC, [123I]Mtr-TOCA enables faster imaging of sstr-positive tumours with a lower radiation burden to the patient. [123I]Mtr-TOCA and [111In]OC allow for tumour imaging with almost identical contrast and diagnostic yield. As regards peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, radioiodinated Mtr-TOCA is hampered by limited intratumoural activity retention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wester HJ, Schottelius M, Scheidhauer K, Reubi JC, Wolf I, Schwaiger M. Comparison of radioiodinated TOC, TOCA and Mtr-TOCA: the effect of carbohydration on the pharmacokinetics. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:28–38
Wester HJ, Schottelius M, Scheidhauer K, Meisetschlager G, Herz M, Rau FC, et al. PET imaging of somatostatin receptors: design, synthesis and preclinical evaluation of a novel 18F-labelled, carbohydrated analogue of octreotide. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:117–22
Reubi JC, Schar JC, Waser B, Wenger S, Heppeler A, Schmitt JS, et al. Affinity profiles for human somatostatin receptor subtypes SST1–SST5 of somatostatin radiotracers selected for scintigraphic and radiotherapeutic use. Eur J Nucl Med 2000;27:273–82
Duncan JR, Stephenson MT, Wu HP, Anderson CJ. Indium-111-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-octreotide is delivered in vivo to pancreatic, tumor cell, renal, and hepatocyte lysosomes. Cancer Res 1997;57:659–71
Koenig JA, Kaur R, Dodgeon I, Edwardson JM, Humphrey PP. Fates of endocytosed somatostatin sst2 receptors and associated agonists. Biochem J 1998;336(Pt 2):291–8
Bakker WH, Krenning EP, Breeman WA, Kooij PP, Reubi JC, Koper JW, et al. In vivo use of a radioiodinated somatostatin analogue: dynamics, metabolism, and binding to somatostatin receptor-positive tumors in man. J Nucl Med 1991;32:1184–9
Krenning EP, Bakker WH, Kooij PP, Breeman WA, Oei HY, de Jong M, et al. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with indium-111-DTPA-D-Phe-1-octreotide in man: metabolism, dosimetry and comparison with iodine-123-Tyr-3-octreotide. J Nucl Med 1992;33:652–8
Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A, Coia L, Goitein M, Munzenrider JE, et al. Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;21:109–22
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stahl, A., Meisetschläger, G., Schottelius, M. et al. [123I]Mtr-TOCA, a radioiodinated and carbohydrated analogue of octreotide: scintigraphic comparison with [111In]octreotide. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33, 45–52 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-005-1872-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-005-1872-2