Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable soft tissue masses: an established localization technique with a new application

  • Technical Report
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To describe the technique of iodine125 (I125) seed deployment into nonpalpable soft tissue masses under direct ultrasound (US) or CT guidance for intraoperative localization.

Materials and methods

Patients considered candidates for radioactive seed localization (RSL) based on advanced imaging findings underwent an ultrasound examination of the area of concern to verify sonographic visualization of the targeted mass. If the mass was not visible sonographically, CT was used for guidance. Patients were scheduled for surgery 1–4 days after seed implantation. Intraoperative frozen section pathological analysis was performed on all patients. Operative time, specimen volume, intraoperative margin status, and final margin status were recorded. Following the surgery, patients and surgeons completed satisfaction surveys.

Results

Ten patients underwent seed placement between 1 and 4 days prior to surgery. All patients had successful surgical resection of the targeted mass with removal of all implanted radioactive seed(s). There was no seed migration. Intraoperative frozen-section margins were negative (>2 mm) in 6/10 patients. Final surgical margins were negative in 9/10 patients. The patient with a positive margin at final pathology did not undergo further resection due to the benign nature of the mass. Patient and surgeon satisfaction survey results were highly positive. All four surgeons reported a strong preference for seed localization over wire localization.

Conclusions

RSL is an effective, reliable, and safe technique for preoperative localization of nonpalpable soft tissue masses and yields high patient and surgeon satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gray RJ, Salud C, Nguyen K, et al. Randomized prospective evaluation of a novel technique for biopsy or lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast lesions: radioactive seed versus wire localization. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8(9):711–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Karstaedt PJ, Roarke MC. Radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable breast lesions is better than wire localization. Am J Surg. 2004;188:377–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hughes JH, Mason MC, Gray RJ, et al. A multi-site validation trial of radioactive seed localization as an alternative to wire localization. Breast J. 2008;14(2):153–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rao R, Moldrem A, Sarode V, et al. Experience with seed localization for nonpalpable breast lesions in a public health care system. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3241–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lovrics PJ, Goldsmith CH, Hodgson N, et al. A multicentered, randomized, controlled trial comparing radioguided seed localization to standard wire localization for nonpalpable, invasive and in situ breast carcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3407–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Murphy JO, Moo TA, King TA, et al. Radioactive seed localization compared to wire localization in breast-conserving surgery: initial 6-month experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(13):4121–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharek D, Zuley ML, Zhang JY, Soran A, Ahrendt GM, Ganott MA. Radioactive seed localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: a comparison of outcomes. AJR. 2015;204(4):872–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barentsz MW, van den Bosch MAAJ, Veldhuis WB, et al. Radioactive seed localization for non-palpable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;100(5):582–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pouw B, de Wit-van der Veen LJ, Stokkel MP, Loo CE, Vrancken Peeters MJ, Valdés Olmos RA. Heading toward radioactive seed localization in non-palpable breast cancer surgery? A meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111:185–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lovrics PJ, Cornacchi SD, Vora R, Goldsmith CH, Kahnamoui K. Systematic review of radioguided surgery for non-palpable breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:388–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bitencourt AG, Lima EN, Pinto PN, Martins EB, Chojniak R. New applications of radioguided surgery in oncology. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(5):397–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dauer LT, Thornton C, Miodownik D, et al. Radioactive seed localization with I125 for nonpalpable lesions prior to breast lumpectomy and/or excisional biopsy: methodology, safety, and experience of initial year. Health Phys. 2013;105(4):356–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. http://www.nrc.gov/materials/miau/med-use-toolkit/seed-localization.html. Accessed 15 March 2016.

  14. Farfalli GL, Aponte-Tinao LA, Rasumoff A, Ayerza MA, Musculo DL. Intraoperative ultrasound assistance for excision of impalpable musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors. Orthopedics. 2011;34(9):e570–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jagadeesan J, Davies JA, Raurell A, Ashford RU. Intraoperative portable ultrasonography localization of clinically impalpable soft-tissue tumors. World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:243–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cox CE, Garcia-Henriquez N, Glancy MJ, Whitworth P, Cox JM, Themar-Geck M, et al. Pilot study of a new nonradioactive surgical guidance technology for locating nonpalpable breast lesions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(6):1824–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mango V, Ha R, Gomberawalla A, Wynn R, Feldman S. Evaluation of the SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system for localization and excision of nonpalpable breast lesions: a feasibility study. Am J Roentgenol. 2016;15:W1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cox CE, Russell S, Prowler V, et al. A prospective, single arm, multi-site, clinical evaluation of a nonradioactive surgical guidance technology for the location of nonpalpable breast lesions during excision. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3168–74. doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5405-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jakub JW, Gray RJ, Degnim AC, et al. Current status of radioactive seed for localization of non palpable breast lesions. Am J Surg. 2010;199:522–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hillary W. Garner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garner, H.W., Bestic, J.M., Peterson, J.J. et al. Preoperative radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable soft tissue masses: an established localization technique with a new application. Skeletal Radiol 46, 209–216 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2529-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2529-x

Keywords

Navigation