Abstract
Objective
To describe the technique of iodine125 (I125) seed deployment into nonpalpable soft tissue masses under direct ultrasound (US) or CT guidance for intraoperative localization.
Materials and methods
Patients considered candidates for radioactive seed localization (RSL) based on advanced imaging findings underwent an ultrasound examination of the area of concern to verify sonographic visualization of the targeted mass. If the mass was not visible sonographically, CT was used for guidance. Patients were scheduled for surgery 1–4 days after seed implantation. Intraoperative frozen section pathological analysis was performed on all patients. Operative time, specimen volume, intraoperative margin status, and final margin status were recorded. Following the surgery, patients and surgeons completed satisfaction surveys.
Results
Ten patients underwent seed placement between 1 and 4 days prior to surgery. All patients had successful surgical resection of the targeted mass with removal of all implanted radioactive seed(s). There was no seed migration. Intraoperative frozen-section margins were negative (>2 mm) in 6/10 patients. Final surgical margins were negative in 9/10 patients. The patient with a positive margin at final pathology did not undergo further resection due to the benign nature of the mass. Patient and surgeon satisfaction survey results were highly positive. All four surgeons reported a strong preference for seed localization over wire localization.
Conclusions
RSL is an effective, reliable, and safe technique for preoperative localization of nonpalpable soft tissue masses and yields high patient and surgeon satisfaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gray RJ, Salud C, Nguyen K, et al. Randomized prospective evaluation of a novel technique for biopsy or lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast lesions: radioactive seed versus wire localization. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8(9):711–5.
Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Karstaedt PJ, Roarke MC. Radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable breast lesions is better than wire localization. Am J Surg. 2004;188:377–80.
Hughes JH, Mason MC, Gray RJ, et al. A multi-site validation trial of radioactive seed localization as an alternative to wire localization. Breast J. 2008;14(2):153–7.
Rao R, Moldrem A, Sarode V, et al. Experience with seed localization for nonpalpable breast lesions in a public health care system. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3241–6.
Lovrics PJ, Goldsmith CH, Hodgson N, et al. A multicentered, randomized, controlled trial comparing radioguided seed localization to standard wire localization for nonpalpable, invasive and in situ breast carcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3407–14.
Murphy JO, Moo TA, King TA, et al. Radioactive seed localization compared to wire localization in breast-conserving surgery: initial 6-month experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(13):4121–7.
Sharek D, Zuley ML, Zhang JY, Soran A, Ahrendt GM, Ganott MA. Radioactive seed localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: a comparison of outcomes. AJR. 2015;204(4):872–7.
Barentsz MW, van den Bosch MAAJ, Veldhuis WB, et al. Radioactive seed localization for non-palpable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;100(5):582–8.
Pouw B, de Wit-van der Veen LJ, Stokkel MP, Loo CE, Vrancken Peeters MJ, Valdés Olmos RA. Heading toward radioactive seed localization in non-palpable breast cancer surgery? A meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111:185–91.
Lovrics PJ, Cornacchi SD, Vora R, Goldsmith CH, Kahnamoui K. Systematic review of radioguided surgery for non-palpable breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:388–97.
Bitencourt AG, Lima EN, Pinto PN, Martins EB, Chojniak R. New applications of radioguided surgery in oncology. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(5):397–402.
Dauer LT, Thornton C, Miodownik D, et al. Radioactive seed localization with I125 for nonpalpable lesions prior to breast lumpectomy and/or excisional biopsy: methodology, safety, and experience of initial year. Health Phys. 2013;105(4):356–65.
http://www.nrc.gov/materials/miau/med-use-toolkit/seed-localization.html. Accessed 15 March 2016.
Farfalli GL, Aponte-Tinao LA, Rasumoff A, Ayerza MA, Musculo DL. Intraoperative ultrasound assistance for excision of impalpable musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors. Orthopedics. 2011;34(9):e570–3.
Jagadeesan J, Davies JA, Raurell A, Ashford RU. Intraoperative portable ultrasonography localization of clinically impalpable soft-tissue tumors. World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:243–6.
Cox CE, Garcia-Henriquez N, Glancy MJ, Whitworth P, Cox JM, Themar-Geck M, et al. Pilot study of a new nonradioactive surgical guidance technology for locating nonpalpable breast lesions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(6):1824–30.
Mango V, Ha R, Gomberawalla A, Wynn R, Feldman S. Evaluation of the SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system for localization and excision of nonpalpable breast lesions: a feasibility study. Am J Roentgenol. 2016;15:W1–4.
Cox CE, Russell S, Prowler V, et al. A prospective, single arm, multi-site, clinical evaluation of a nonradioactive surgical guidance technology for the location of nonpalpable breast lesions during excision. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3168–74. doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5405-y.
Jakub JW, Gray RJ, Degnim AC, et al. Current status of radioactive seed for localization of non palpable breast lesions. Am J Surg. 2010;199:522–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garner, H.W., Bestic, J.M., Peterson, J.J. et al. Preoperative radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable soft tissue masses: an established localization technique with a new application. Skeletal Radiol 46, 209–216 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2529-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2529-x