Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of different coils on biochemical T2 and T2* relaxation time mapping of articular patella cartilage

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of our study was to assess T2 and T2* relaxation time values of patella cartilage in healthy volunteers using three different coils at 3.0 Tesla MRI and their influence on the quantitative values.

Methods

Fifteen volunteers were examined on the same 3-Tesla MR unit using three different coils: (i) a dedicated eight-channel knee phased-array coil; (ii) an eight-channel multi-purpose coil, and (iii) a one-channel 1H surface coil. T2 and T2* relaxation time measurements were prepared by a multi-echo spinecho respectively a gradient-echo sequence. A semi-automatic region-of-interest analysis was performed for patella cartilage. To allow stratification, a subregional analysis was carried out (deep-superficial cartilage layer). Statistical analysis-of-variance was performed.

Results

The mean quantitative T2 values showed statistically significant differences in all comparison combinations. The differences between the mean quantitative T2* values were slightly less pronounced than the T2 evaluation and only the comparison between (i) and (ii) showed a significant difference. The results of T2 and T2* values showed, independent of the used coil, higher values in the superficial zone compared to the deep zone (p < 0.05). Looking at the signal alterations, all coils showed clearly higher values (and thus more signal alterations as a sign of noise) in the deep layer. The validation of the reliability showed a high intra-class correlation coefficient and hence a very high plausibility (ICC was between 0.870 and 0.905 for T2 mapping and between 0.879 and 0.888 for T2* mapping).

Conclusions

The present results demonstrate that biochemical T2 and T2* mapping is significantly dependent on the utilized coil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Felson DT. Clinical practice. Osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(8):841–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chung CB, Frank LR, Resnick D. Cartilage imaging techniques: current clinical applications and state of the art imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;391(Suppl):S370–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burstein D, Gray M, Mosher T, Dardzinski B. Measures of molecular composition and structure in osteoarthritis. Radiol Clin N Am. 2009;47(4):675–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mamisch TC, Hughes T, Mosher TJ, Mueller C, Trattnig S, Boesch C, et al. T2 star relaxation times for assessment of articular cartilage at 3 T: a feasibility study. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41(3):287–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Regatte RR, Schweitzer ME. Novel contrast mechanisms at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2008;12(3):266–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ. Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2004;8(4):355–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burstein D, Velyvis J, Scott KT, Stock KW, Kim YJ, Jaramillo D, et al. Protocol issues for delayed Gd(DTPA)(2-)-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for clinical evaluation of articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med. 2001;45(1):36–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Potter K, Butler JJ, Horton WE, Spencer RG. Response of engineered cartilage tissue to biochemical agents as studied by proton magnetic resonance microscopy. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(7):1580–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eckstein F, Kunz M, Hudelmaier M, Jackson R, Yu J, Eaton CB, et al. Impact of coil design on the contrast-to-noise ratio, precision, and consistency of quantitative cartilage morphometry at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med. 2007;57(2):448–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dietrich O, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO. Artifacts in 3-T MRI: physical background and reduction strategies. Eur J Radiol. 2008;65(1):29–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO. Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26(2):375–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Raynauld JP, Martel-Pelletier J, Berthiaume MJ, Labonte F, Beaudoin G, de Guise JA, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of knee osteoarthritis progression over two years and correlation with clinical symptoms and radiologic changes. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(2):476–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Balamoody S, Williams TG, Waterton JC, Bowes M, Hodgson R, Taylor CJ, et al. Comparison of 3T MR scanners in regional cartilage-thickness analysis in osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional multicenter, multivendor study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010; 12(5):R202.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Glaser C, Mendlik T, Dinges J, Weber J, Stahl R, Trumm C, et al. Global and regional reproducibility of T2 relaxation time measurements in human patellar cartilage. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med. 2006;56(3):527–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mosher TJ, Zhang Z, Reddy R, Boudhar S, Milestone BN, Morrison WB, et al. Knee articular cartilage damage in osteoarthritis: analysis of MR image biomarker reproducibility in ACRIN-PA 4001 multicenter trial. Radiology. 2011;258(3):832–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang G, Wiggins GC, Xia D, Lattanzi R, Madelin G, Raya JG, et al. Comparison of a 28-channel receive array coil and quadrature volume coil for morphologic imaging and T2 mapping of knee cartilage at 7T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35(2):441–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eckstein F, Burstein D, Link TM. Quantitative MRI of cartilage and bone: degenerative changes in osteoarthritis. NMR Biomed. 2006;19(7):822–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Koff MF, Parratte S, Amrami KK, Kaufman KR. Examiner repeatability of patellar cartilage T2 values. Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;27(1):131–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support for this study was provided by the German Research Fondation (DFG) - DACH Grant WE 4881/1 "Multi-parametric visualization of knee joint ultra-structure: Validation of biochemical magnetic resonance imaging from bench to bedside".

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MR Center, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Lazarettgasse 14, Vienna, Austria

    Milena L. Pachowsky, Siegfried Trattnig, Sebastian Apprich, Stephan Zbyn & Goetz H. Welsch

  2. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany

    Milena L. Pachowsky, Andreas Mauerer & Goetz H. Welsch

Authors
  1. Milena L. Pachowsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Siegfried Trattnig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sebastian Apprich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andreas Mauerer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stephan Zbyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Goetz H. Welsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Goetz H. Welsch.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(JPEG 26 kb)

High Resolution Image

(TIFF 93 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pachowsky, M.L., Trattnig, S., Apprich, S. et al. Impact of different coils on biochemical T2 and T2* relaxation time mapping of articular patella cartilage. Skeletal Radiol 42, 1565–1572 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1699-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1699-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation