Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ewing sarcoma versus osteomyelitis: differential diagnosis with magnetic resonance imaging

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To find and evaluate characteristic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) patterns for the differentiation between Ewing sarcoma and osteomyelitis.

Materials and methods

We identified 28 consecutive patients referred to our department for MRI (1.5 T) of an unclear bone lesion with clinical symptoms suggestive of Ewing sarcoma or osteomyelitis. MRI scans were re-evaluated by two experienced radiologists, typical MR imaging features were documented and a diagnostic decision between Ewing sarcoma and osteomyelitis was made. Statistical significance of the association between MRI features and the biopsy-based diagnosis was assessed using Fisher’s exact test.

Results

The most clear-cut pattern for determining the correct diagnosis was the presence of a sharp and defined margin of the bone lesion, which was found in all patients with Ewing sarcoma, but in none of the patients with osteomyelitis (P < 0.0001). Contrast enhancing soft tissue was present in all cases with Ewing sarcoma and absent in 4 patients with osteomyelitis (P = 0.0103). Cortical destruction was found in all patients with Ewing sarcoma, 4 patients with osteomyelitis did not present any cortical reaction (P = 0.0103). Cystic or necrotic areas were identified in 13 patients with Ewing sarcoma and in 1 patient with osteomyelitis (P = 0.004). Interobserver reliability was very good (kappa = 1) in Ewing sarcoma and moderate (kappa = 0.6) in patients with osteomyelitis.

Conclusions

A sharp and defined margin, optimally visualized on T1-weighted images in comparison to short tau inversion recovery (STIR) images, is the most significant feature of Ewing sarcoma in differentiating from osteomyelitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eggli KD, Quiogue T, Moser Jr RP. Ewing’s sarcoma. Radiol Clin North Am. 1993;31(2):325–37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grier HE. The Ewing family of tumors. Ewing’s sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumors. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1997;44(4):991–1004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dominkus M, Kainberger F, Lang S, Kotz R. Primary malignant bone tumors. Clinical aspects and therapy. Vienna Bone Tumor Registry. Radiologe. 1998;38(6):82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dahlin DC, Coventry MB, Scanlon PW. Ewing’s sarcoma. A critical analysis of 165 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1961;43-A:185–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilkins RM, Pritchard DJ, Burgert Jr EO, Unni KK. Ewing’s sarcoma of bone. Experience with 140 patients. Cancer. 1986;58(11):2551–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernstein M, Kovar H, Paulussen M, Randall RL, Schuck A, Teot LA, et al. Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors: current management. Oncologist. 2006;11(5):503–19. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.11-5-503.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Henk CB, Grampp S, Wiesbauer P, Zoubek A, Kainberger F, Breitenseher M, et al. Ewing sarcoma. Diagnostic imaging. Radiologe. 1998;38(6):509–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Durbin M, Randall RL, James M, Sudilovsky D, Zoger S. Ewing’s sarcoma masquerading as osteomyelitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;357:176–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grier HE, Krailo MD, Tarbell NJ, Link MP, Fryer CJ, Pritchard DJ, et al. Addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to standard chemotherapy for Ewing’s sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor of bone. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(8):694–701. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa020890.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Miser JS, Krailo MD, Tarbell NJ, Link MP, Fryer CJ, Pritchard DJ, et al. Treatment of metastatic Ewing’s sarcoma or primitive neuroectodermal tumor of bone: evaluation of combination ifosfamide and etoposide–a Children’s Cancer Group and Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(14):2873–6. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.01.041.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mar WA, Taljanovic MS, Bagatell R, Graham AR, Speer DP, Hunter TB, et al. Update on imaging and treatment of Ewing sarcoma family tumors: what the radiologist needs to know. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008;32(1):108–18. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e31805c030f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Erdman WA, Tamburro F, Jayson HT, Weatherall PT, Ferry KB, Peshock RM. Osteomyelitis: characteristics and pitfalls of diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1991;180(2):533–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McGuinness B, Wilson N, Doyle AJ. The “penumbra sign” on T1-weighted MRI for differentiating musculoskeletal infection from tumour. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36(5):417–21. doi:10.1007/s00256-006-0267-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleiss JL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull. 1971;76(5):378–82. doi:10.1037/h0031619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boyko OB, Cory DA, Cohen MD, Provisor A, Mirkin D, DeRosa GP. MR imaging of osteogenic and Ewing’s sarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148(2):317–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoffer FA. Primary skeletal neoplasms: osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;13(4):231–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoffer FA, Nikanorov AY, Reddick WE, Bodner SM, Xiong X, Jones-Wallace D, et al. Accuracy of MR imaging for detecting epiphyseal extension of osteosarcoma. Pediatr Radiol. 2000;30(5):289–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Weber KL, Sim FH. Ewing’s sarcoma: presentation and management. J Orthop Sci. 2001;6(4):366–71. doi:10.1007/s0077610060366.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mellado Santos JM. Diagnostic imaging of pediatric hematogenous osteomyelitis: lessons learned from a multi-modality approach. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(9):2109–19. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0187-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. MacVicar AD, Olliff JF, Pringle J, Pinkerton CR, Husband JE. Ewing sarcoma: MR imaging of chemotherapy-induced changes with histologic correlation. Radiology. 1992;184(3):859–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Davies AM, Grimer R. The penumbra sign in subacute osteomyelitis. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(6):1268–70. doi:10.1007/s00330-004-2435-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Argyropoulou PI, Verettas DA, Prassopoulos P. “Penumbra sign” on magnetic resonance imaging. J Trauma. 2006;60(2):458. doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000202469.18359.1c. author reply 459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller TT. Bone tumors and tumorlike conditions: analysis with conventional radiography. Radiology. 2008;246(3):662–74. doi:10.1148/radiol.2463061038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jerome JT, Sankaran B, Varghese M, Thomas S, Thirumagal SK. Rare presentation of Ewing’s sarcoma: a case report and literature review. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2008;17(5):261–4. doi:10.1097/BPB.0b013e3283069261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Santiago Restrepo C, Gimenez CR, McCarthy K. Imaging of osteomyelitis and musculoskeletal soft tissue infections: current concepts. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2003;29(1):89–109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Baraga JJ, Amrami KK, Swee RG, Wold L, Unni KK. Radiographic features of Ewing’s sarcoma of the bones of the hands and feet. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30(3):121–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Meyers SP. MRI of bone and soft tissue tumors and tumorlike lesions: differential diagnosis and atlas. New York: Thieme; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Van der Woude HJ, Bloem JL, Hogendoorn PC. Preoperative evaluation and monitoring chemotherapy in patients with high-grade osteogenic and Ewing’s sarcoma: review of current imaging modalities. Skeletal Radiol. 1998;27(2):57–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Neubauer H, Evangelista L, Morbach H, Girschick H, Prelog M, Kostler H, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI of bone marrow oedema, soft tissue oedema and synovitis in paediatric patients: feasibility and initial experience. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2012;10(1):20. doi:10.1186/1546-0096-10-20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Costa FM, Ferreira EC, Vianna EM. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of musculoskeletal tumors. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2011;19(1):159–80. doi:10.1016/j.mric.2010.10.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Balliu E, Vilanova JC, Pelaez I, Puig J, Remollo S, Barcelo C, et al. Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficients to differentiate benign from malignant vertebral bone marrow lesions. Eur J Radiol. 2009;69(3):560–6. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.037.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Henninger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henninger, B., Glodny, B., Rudisch, A. et al. Ewing sarcoma versus osteomyelitis: differential diagnosis with magnetic resonance imaging. Skeletal Radiol 42, 1097–1104 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1632-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1632-5

Keywords

Navigation