Abstract
Background/aims
The elbow is among the most common joints that are aspirated and/or injected. An intra-articular approach should be a convenient and a safe procedure with minimal risk of complications. Several approaches to access the elbow joint have been outlined in the literature, but a comparative study is lacking. This study evaluates the technical feasibility of the lesser-performed posterior transtriceps approach with MR arthrography and compares it to the classic lateral radiocapitellar approach.
Patients and methods
Using fluoroscopy guidance, MR arthrographies of the elbow were performed in 51 consecutive patients from 2006 to 2011. A classical lateral radiocapitellar approach was performed in 29 and a posterior transtriceps approach in 22 elbows. Studies were retrospectively reviewed with special attention to the extent of extra-articular contrast extravasation. This was a level IV diagnostic study.
Results
Contrast leakage occurred in 12 radiocapitellar approaches, which caused a diagnostic dilemma in one subject. There was only a minimal amount of contrast leakage in five subjects using the transtriceps approach and no diagnostic dilemmas occurred. Results show no significant differences between the approaches. No complications occurred in the posterior transtriceps group and all MR arthrographies were diagnostic.
Conclusions
The posterior transtriceps approach is a technical feasible procedure, is easy to perform, and avoids a diagnostic dilemma in presumed injuries to the lateral collateral ligament complex. Our results show a tendency of even lesser amount of contrast leakage, further promoting a more widespread usage of the posterior transtriceps approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
Daley EL, Bajaj S, Bisson LJ, Cole BJ. Improving injection accuracy of the elbow, knee, and shoulder: does injection site and imaging make a difference? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(3):656–62. doi:10.1177/0363546510390610.
Chalidis BE, Papadopoulos PP, Sachinis NC, Dimitriou CG. Aspiration alone versus aspiration and bupivacaine injection in the treatment of undisplaced radial head fractures: a prospective randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(5):676–9. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.003.
Cardone DA, Tallia AF. Diagnostic and therapeutic injection of the elbow region. Am Fam Physician. 2002;66(11):2097–100.
Crim J. Elbow arthrography in specialty imaging arthrography; principles and practice in radiology; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008. p. 78–95. (ISBN 1931884153).
Steinbach LS, Palmer WE, Schweitzer ME. Special focus session. MR arthrography. Radiographics. 2002;22(5):1223–46.
Hudson TM. Elbow arthrography. Radiol Clin North Am. 1981;19(2):227–41.
Jacobson JA, Propeck T, Jamadar DA, Jebson PJ, Hayes CW. US of the anterior bundle of the ulnar collateral ligament: findings in five cadaver elbows with MR arthrographic and anatomic comparison–initial observations. Radiology. 2003;227(2):561–6. doi:10.1148/radiol.2272020462.
Lohman M, Borrero C, Casagranda B, Rafiee B, Towers J. The posterior transtriceps approach for elbow arthrography: a forgotten technique? Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38(5):513–6. doi:10.1007/s00256-008-0634-1. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
Steinbach LS, Fritz RC, Tirman PF, Uffman M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the elbow. Eur J Radiol. 1997;25(3):223–41.
Cotten A, Jacobson J, Brossmann J, Hodler J, Trudell D, Resnick D. MR arthrography of the elbow: normal anatomy and diagnostic pitfalls. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21(4):516–22. doi:10.1097/00004728-199707000-00002.
Elentuck D, Palmer WE. Direct magnetic resonance arthrography. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(11):1956–67. doi:10.1007/s00330-004-2449-3. Epub 2004 Sep 3.
Palmer WE. MR arthrography: is it worthwhile? Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;8(1):24–43.
Shahabpour M, Kichouh M, Laridon E, Gielen JL, De Mey J. The effectiveness of diagnostic imaging methods for the assessment of soft tissue and articular disorders of the shoulder and elbow. Eur J Radiol. 2008;65(2):194–200. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.012.
Yiannakopoulos CK. Diagnosis and treatment of postarthroscopic synovial knee fistulae: a report of four cases and review of the literature. J Knee Surg. 2007;20(1):34–8.
van Riet RP, Morrey BF, Ho E, O'Driscoll SW. Surgical treatment of distal triceps ruptures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(10):1961–7.
Lopes RV, Furtado RN, Parmigiani L, Rosenfeld A, Fernandes AR, Natour J. Accuracy of intra-articular injections in peripheral joints performed blindly in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol (Oxford). 2008;47(12):1792–4. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken355.
Acknowledgments
Disclaimer
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 20 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Wagenberg, JM., Turkenburg, J.L., Rahusen, F.T.G. et al. The posterior transtriceps approach for intra-articular elbow diagnostics, definitely not forgotten. Skeletal Radiol 42, 55–59 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1430-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1430-5