Skip to main content
Log in

The posterior transtriceps approach for elbow arthrography: a forgotten technique?

  • Technical Report
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the technical feasibility of performing elbow MR arthrography via a posterior approach through the triceps.

Materials and methods

The images of 19 patients with elbow MR arthrography via a posterior transtriceps approach were retrospectively studied. The injections were performed by four musculoskeletal radiologists, using fluoroscopic guidance and a 22- or 25-gauge needle. The fluoroscopic and subsequent MR images were reviewed by two musculoskeletal radiologists and evaluated for adequacy of joint capsular distention, degree and location of contrast leakage, and presence of gas bubbles.

Results

The injection was diagnostic in all 19 patients, with a sufficient amount of contrast agent seen in the elbow joint. No significant contrast leakage occurred in 12 patients who received injections of 8 cc or less of contrast agent, but moderate contrast leakage occurred in 6/7 patients who received injections of greater than 8 cc. Contrast leakage generally occurred within the triceps myotendinous junction. No gas bubbles were identified in the injected joints.

Conclusion

Patients often present for MR arthrography of the elbow with medial or lateral elbow pain. Contrast leakage during a radiocapitellar approach may complicate evaluation of the lateral collateral ligament or the common extensor tendon origin. Transtriceps MR arthrography offers an alternative to the more commonly used radiocapitellar approach. With injected volumes not exceeding 8 cc, the risk of significant contrast leakage is small. An advantage of the transtriceps injection is that contrast leakage through the posterior needle tract does not interfere with evaluation of the lateral structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dubberley JH, Faber KJ, Patterson SD, et al. The detection of loose bodies in the elbow: the value of MRI and CT arthrography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 684–686.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Timmerman LA, Schwartz ML, Andrews JR. Preoperative evaluation of the ulnar collateral ligament by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography arthrography. Evaluation in 25 baseball players with surgical confirmation. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22: 26–31. discussion 32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwartz ML, al-Zahrani S, Morwessel RM, Andrews JR. Ulnar collateral ligament injury in the throwing athlete: evaluation with saline-enhanced MR arthrography. Radiology 1995; 197: 297–299.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakanishi K, Masatomi T, Ochi T, et al. MR arthrography of elbow: evaluation of the ulnar collateral ligament of elbow. Skeletal Radiol 1996; 25: 629–634.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Munshi M, Pretterklieber ML, Chung CB, et al. Anterior bundle of ulnar collateral ligament: evaluation of anatomic relationships by using MR imaging, MR arthrography, and gross anatomic and histologic analysis. Radiology 2004; 231: 797–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobson JA, Propeck T, Jamadar DA, Jebson PJ, Hayes CW. US of the anterior bundle of the ulnar collateral ligament: findings in five cadaver elbows with MR arthrographic and anatomic comparison–initial observations. Radiology 2003; 227: 561–566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carrino JA, Morrison WB, Zou KH, Steffen RT, Snearly WN, Murray PM. Lateral ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow: optimization of evaluation with two-dimensional MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 218: 118–125.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Carrino JA, Morrison WB, Zou KH, Steffen RT, Snearly WN, Murray PM. Noncontrast MR imaging and MR arthrography of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow: prospective evaluation of two-dimensional pulse sequences for detection of complete tears. Skeletal Radiol 2001; 30: 625–632.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Arvidsson H, Johansson O. Arthrography of the elbow-joint. Acta radiol 1955; 43: 445–452.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hudson TM. Elbow arthrography. Radiol Clin North Am 1981; 19: 227–241.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Teng MM, Murphy WA, Gilula LA, et al. Elbow arthrography: a reassessment of the technique. Radiology 1984; 153: 611–613.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Roback DL. Elbow arthrography: brief technical considerations. Clin Radiol 1979; 30: 311–312.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Eto RT, Anderson PW, Harley JD. Elbow arthrography with the application of tomography. Radiology 1975; 115: 283–288.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Singson RD, Feldman F, Rosenberg ZS. Elbow joint: assessment with double-contrast CT arthrography. Radiology 1986; 160: 167–173.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Holland P, Davies AM, Cassar-Pullicino VN. Computed tomographic arthrography in the assessment of osteochondritis dissecans of the elbow. Clin Radiol 1994; 49: 231–235.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Waldt S, Bruegel M, Ganter K, et al. Comparison of multislice CT arthrography and MR arthrography for the detection of articular cartilage lesions of the elbow. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 784–791.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cotten A, Jacobson J, Brossmann J, et al. Collateral ligaments of the elbow: conventional MR imaging and MR arthrography with coronal oblique plane and elbow flexion. Radiology 1997; 204: 806–812.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cotten A, Jacobson J, Brossmann J, Hodler J, Trudell D, Resnick D. MR arthrography of the elbow: normal anatomy and diagnostic pitfalls. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21: 516–522.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Steinbach LS, Schwartz M. Elbow arthrography. Radiol Clin North Am 1998; 36: 635–649.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Carrino JA, Smith DK, Schweitzer ME. MR arthrography of the elbow and wrist. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 1998; 2: 397–414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Berquist TH. Diagnostic and therapeutic injections as an aid to musculoskeletal diagnosis. Semin Intervent Radiol 1994; 4: 326–343.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Steinbach LS, Palmer WE, Schweitzer ME. Special focus session. MR arthrography. Radiographics 2002; 22: 1223–1246.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sauser DD, Thordarson SH, Fahr LM. Imaging of the elbow. Radiol Clin North Am 1990; 28: 923–940.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Elentuck D, Palmer WE. Direct magnetic resonance arthrography. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 1956–1967.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brunton LM, Anderson MW, Pannunzio ME, Khanna AJ, Chhabra AB. Magnetic resonance imaging of the elbow: update on current techniques and indications. J Hand Surg [Am] 2006; 31: 1001–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Grainger AJ, Elliott JM, Campbell RS, Tirman PF, Steinbach LS, Genant HK. Direct MR arthrography: a review of current use. Clin Radiol 2000; 55: 163–176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang CW, Skaggs DL, Kay RM. Elbow aspiration and arthrogram: an alternative method. Am J Orthop 2001; 30: 256.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chung CB, Dwek JR, Feng S, Resnick D. MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint: a tailored approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 217–219.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. van Riet RP, Morrey BF, Ho E, O’Driscoll SW. Surgical treatment of distal triceps ruptures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A: 1961–1967.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank secretary Pat Templer for her technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Lohman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lohman, M., Borrero, C., Casagranda, B. et al. The posterior transtriceps approach for elbow arthrography: a forgotten technique?. Skeletal Radiol 38, 513–516 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0634-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0634-1

Keywords

Navigation