Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Arthroscopic all-inside meniscal repair—Does the meniscus heal?

A clinical and radiological follow-up examination to verify meniscal healing using a 3-T MRI

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to correlate clinical and radiological results using a 3-T MRI to verify meniscal healing after arthroscopic all-inside meniscus repair.

Materials and methods

We selected 27 patients (14 men and 13 women) with an average age of 31 ± 9 years and retrospective clinical examinations and radiological assessments using a 3-T MRI after all-inside arthroscopic meniscal repair were conducted. Repair of the medial meniscus was performed in 19 patients and of the lateral meniscus in eight. In 17 patients (63%), we performed concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The mean follow-up period was 4.5 ± 1.7 years. The Lysholm score and Tegner activity index were used for clinical evaluation. Four grades were used to classify the radiological signal alterations within the meniscus: central globular (grade 1); linear horizontal or band-like (grade 2); intrameniscal alterations and linear signal alterations communicating with the articular surface (grade 3); and complex tears (grade 4).

Results

At follow-up, the average Lysholm score was 76 ± 15 points, with ten of the patients placed in group 6 based on the Tegner activity index. MRI examinations revealed no signal alteration in three patients, grade 1 in 0, grade 2 in five, grade 3 in 13, and grade 4 in six. The MRI findings correlated positively with the clinical scores in 21 patients (78%).

Conclusions

Correlation of clinical and radiological examination was performed using 3-T MRI. In spite of satisfactory clinical outcomes at follow-up, a radiological signal alteration may still be visible on MRI, which was believed to be scar tissue, but could not be proven definitively. Imaging with a 3-Tesla MRI after meniscal suture surgery provides good but no definitive reliability on meniscus healing and therefore gives no advantage compared to 1.5-T MRI, with good clinical outcome using an all-inside arthroscopic meniscal repair.

Clinical relevance

3T-MRI can not substitute diagnostic arthroscopy in patients with persistent complaints after arthroscopic all-inside meniscal repair.

Level of evidence

Retrospective case series (EBM Level IV)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahn JH, Wang JH, Yoo JC, Noh HK, Park JH. A pull out suture for transection of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus: using a posterior trans-septal portal. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:1510–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barber FA, McGarry JE. Meniscal repair techniques. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2007;15:199–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bryant D, Dill J, Litchfield R, Amendola A, Giffin R, Fowler P, et al. Effectiveness of bioabsorbable arrows compared with inside-out suturing for vertical, reparable meniscal lesions: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:889–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Quinby JS, Golish SR, Hart JA, Diduch DR. All-inside meniscal repair using a new flexible, tensionable device. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1281–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sgaglione NA, Steadman JR, Shaffer B, Miller MD, Fu FH. Current concepts in meniscus surgery: resection to replacement. Arthroscopy. 2003;19 Suppl 1:161–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Steenbrugge F, Van Nieuwenhuyse W, Verdonk R, Verstraete K. Arthroscopic meniscus repair in the ACL-deficient knee. Int Orthop. 2005;29:109–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bryant D, Dill J, Litchfield R, Amendola A, Giffin R, Fowler P, et al. Effectiveness of bioabsorbable arrows compared with inside-out suturing for vertical, reparable meniscal lesions: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:889–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barber FA, McGarry JE. Meniscal repair techniques. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2007;15:199–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McCauley TR. MR imaging evaluation of the postoperative knee. Radiology. 2005;234:53–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sampson MJ, Jackson MP, Moran CJ, Moran R, Eustace SJ, Shine S. Three Tesla MRI for the diagnosis of meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament pathology: a comparison to arthroscopic findings. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:1106–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Magee T, Williams D. 3.0-T MRI of meniscal tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:371–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. von Engelhardt LV, Schmitz A, Pennekamp PH, Schild HH, Wirtz DC, von Falkenhausen F. Diagnostics of degenerative meniscal tears at 3-Tesla MRI compared to arthroscopy as reference standard. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:451–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kornaat PR, Bloem JL, Ceulemans RY, Riyazi N, Rosendaal FR, Nelissen RG, et al. Osteoarthritis of the knee: association between clinical features and MR imaging findings. Radiology. 2006;239:811–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10:150–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;43–9.

  16. Barber FA, McGarry JE. Meniscal repair techniques. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2007;15:199–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stoller DW. Meniscal tears - Pathologic correlation with MR imaging - reply. Radiology. 1988;166:580–1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stoller DW. The knee. Semin Roentgenol. 1995;30:277–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Haklar U, Kocaoglu B, Nalbantoglu U, Tuzuner T, Guven O. Arthroscopic repair of radial lateral meniscus [corrected] tear by double horizontal sutures with inside-outside technique. Knee. 2008;15:355–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lim PS, Schweitzer ME, Bhatia M, Giuliano V, Kaneriya PP, Senyk RM, et al. Repeat tear of postoperative meniscus: potential MR imaging signs. Radiology. 1999;210:183–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McCauley TR. MR imaging evaluation of the postoperative knee. Radiology. 2005;234:53–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barber FA, Harding NR. Meniscal repair rehabilitation. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:207–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barber FA, McGarry JE. Meniscal repair techniques. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2007;15:199–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barber FA, Click SD. Meniscus repair rehabilitation with concurrent anterior cruciate reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:433–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haas AL, Schepsis AA, Hornstein J, Edgar CM. Meniscal repair using the FasT-Fix all-inside meniscal repair device. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:167–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Barber FA, Schroeder FA, Oro FB, Beavis RC. FasT-Fix meniscal repair: mid-term results. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:1342–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Miller MD, Kline AJ, Gonzales J, Beach WR. Pitfalls associated with FasT-Fix meniscal repair. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:939–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Quinby JS, Golish SR, Hart JA, Diduch DR. All-inside meniscal repair using a new flexible, tensionable device. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1281–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Magee T, Williams D. 3.0-T MRI of meniscal tears. AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:371–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. von Engelhardt LV, Schmitz A, Pennekamp PH, Schild HH, Wirtz DC, von Falkenhausen F. Diagnostics of degenerative meniscal tears at 3-Tesla MRI compared to arthroscopy as reference standard. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:451–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Salvi AE, Bettinsoli R. Considerations about the knee arthrography for detection of meniscal tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:99–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mathieu L, Bouchard A, Marchaland JP, Potet J, Fraboulet B, Danguy-Des-Deserts M, et al. Knee MR-arthrography in assessment of meniscal and chondral lesions. Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research. 2009;95:40–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Steenbrugge F, Van Nieuwenhuyse W, Verdonk R, Verstraete K. Arthroscopic meniscus repair in the ACL-deficient knee. Int Orthop. 2005;29:109–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schoth F, Kraemer N, Niendorf T, Hohl C, Gunther RW, Krombach GA. Comparison of image quality in magnetic resonance imaging of the knee at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla using 32-channel receiver coils. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2258–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Hoffelner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoffelner, T., Resch, H., Forstner, R. et al. Arthroscopic all-inside meniscal repair—Does the meniscus heal?. Skeletal Radiol 40, 181–187 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-0965-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-0965-6

Keywords

Navigation