Skip to main content
Log in

Considerations about the knee arthrography for detection of meniscal tears

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Boutin RD, Briggs JE, Williamson MR (1994) Injuries associated with MR imaging: survey of safety records and methods used to screen patients for metallic foreign bodies before imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162(1):189–194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Crawford R, Walley G, Bridgman S, Maffulli N (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee pathology, concentrating on meniscal lesions and ACL tears: a systematic review Br Med Bull (in press)

  3. Evans SE, Chandy J, Aldridge MJ (1991) The place of arthrography in the diagnosis and management of meniscal injuries–a 6-year review. J R Soc Med 84(3):133–135

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Freiberger RH, Killoran PJ, Cardona G (1966) Arthrography of the knee by double contrast method. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 97(3):736–747

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gopez AG, Kavanagh EC (2006) MR imaging of the postoperative meniscus: repair, resection, and replacement. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 10(3):229–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaye JJ (1985) Knee arthrography today. Radiology 157(1):265–266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kempf FK (1980) Treatment of meniscus defects with reference to our operative method. Subtotal meniscectomy, resection of Hoffa’s corpus adiposum, inner drainage. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 96(2):95–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lupi L, Corcione S, Cervi PM, Bighi S, Merlo L, Vita G (1991) Diagnostic potential of double contrast arthrography of the knee with the digital technique. Skeletal Radiol 20(1):5–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Morvan G (1994) What remains of arthrography? Rev Prat 44(12):1573–1579

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicholas JA, Freiberger RH, Killoran PJ (1970) Double-contrast arthrography of the knee. Its value in the management of two hundred and twenty-five knee derangements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(2):203–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Otto H, Kallenberger R (1987) Arthrography of the knee today. Radiologe 27:64–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stoker DJ (1977) Arthrography of the knee. Br Med J 1(6056):287–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thijn CJ (1982) Accuracy of double-contrast arthrography and arthroscopy of the knee joint. Skeletal Radiol 8(3):187–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas S, Pullagura M, Robinson E, Cohen A, Banaszkiewicz P (2007) The value of magnetic resonance imaging in our current management of ACL and meniscal injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(5):533–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Dyck P, Gielen J, D’Anvers J, Vanhoenacker F, Dossche L, Van Gestel J, Parizel PM (2007) MR diagnosis of meniscal tears of the knee: analysis of error patterns. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(9):849–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ververidis AN, Verettas DA, Kazakos KJ, Tilkeridis CE, Chatzipapas CN (2006) Meniscal bucket handle tears: a retrospective study of arthroscopy and the relation to MRI. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(4):343–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Emilio Salvi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salvi, A.E., Bettinsoli, R. Considerations about the knee arthrography for detection of meniscal tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthr 16, 99–100 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-007-0462-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-007-0462-1

Keywords

Navigation