Skip to main content
Log in

A solid waste disposal site selection procedure based on groundwater vulnerability mapping

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

In this study, a new, GIS-based solid waste site selection tool (DUPIT) is introduced to obtain a systematic and unbiased methodology during the evaluation phases of alternative solid waste disposal areas with regards to vulnerability to groundwater pollution. The proposed tool is an index technique based on the linear combination of five different hydrogeological parameters including Depth to groundwater table, Upper layer lithology, Permeability of the unsaturated zone, Impermeable layer thickness and Topographic slope. Five different categories are developed to classify each alternative based on the suitability of the site for a solid waste disposal area. As a result, each site is ranked according to the contamination risks for groundwater resources. The proposed technique is applied to the District of Torbali near Izmir, Turkey to determine the most appropriate solid waste disposal site location. The Torbali application is implemented by using a GIS database developed for the area. Based on the results of this application, the best alternative solid waste disposal site for Torbali is selected to be located in the northern portions of the city where the groundwater table is deep, the permeability is low and the topographic slope is mild.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeological settings. Prepared for the US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, EPA-600/2-87-035. National Water Well Association, Dublin, OH

  • Bagch A (1994) Design, construction and monitoring of landfills, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Civita M (1994) Vulnerability maps of aquifers subjected to pollution: theory and practice. Pitagora Editrice, Bologna (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford JF, Smith PG (1985) Landfill technology. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorhofer G, Siebert H (1998) The search for landfill sites—requirements and implementation in Lower Saxony, Germany. Environ Geol 35:55–65 (DOI: 10.1007/s002540050292)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorn M, Tantiwanit W (2001) New methods for searching for waste disposal sites in the Chiang Mai–Lamphun basin, Northern Thailand. Environ Geol 40:507–517 (DOI: 10.1007/s002540000187)

    Google Scholar 

  • Edet AE (2004) Vulnerability evaluation of a coastal plain sand aquifer with a case example from Calabar, southeastern Nigeria. Environ Geol 45:1062–1070 (DOI: 10.1007/s00254-004-0964-9)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekpo BO, Ibok UJ, Umoh ND (2000) Geochemical evaluation of suitability of sites for hazardous waste disposal: a case study of recent and old waste-disposal sites in Calabar Municipality, SE Nigeria. Environ Geol 39:1286–1294 (DOI: 10.1007/s002540000114)

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (1999) Getting to know ArcView GIS, 3rd edn. ESRI Press, Redlands, CA

  • Foster SSD (1987) Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: Duijvanbooden W, van Waegeningh HG (eds) Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollution. Proceedings and Information No. 38 of the International Conference held in the Netherlands, TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, Delft, The Netherlands

  • Foster SSD (1998) Groundwater recharge and pollution vulnerability of British aquifers: a critical overview. Geological Society Special Publication, No:130, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibe KM, Nwankwor GI, Onyekuru SO (2001) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability and its application to the development of protection strategy for the water supply aquifer in Owerri, southeastern Nigeria. Environ Monit Assess 67:323–360 (DOI: 10.1023/A:1006358030562)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2003) Evaluation of waste disposal site using the DRASTIC system in Southern Korea. Environ Geol 44:654–664 (DOI: 10.1007/s00254-003-0803-4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao KS (1997) Site selection for a landfill. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakiyan J, Yazicigil H (2004) Sustainable development and management of an aquifer system in western Turkey. Hydrogeol J 12:66–80 (DOI: 10.1007/s10040-003-0315-z)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreck P (1998) Environmental impact of uncontrolled waste disposal in mining and industrial areas in Central Germany. Environ Geol 35:66–72 (DOI: 10.1007/s002540050293)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsek C (2002) The hydrogeological investigations for the site selection of the landfill area of the Torbalı Plain. PhD Thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir

  • Simsek C, Karaca Z, Gemici U, Gunduz O (2005) The assessment of the impacts of marble waste site on the water and sediment quality in a river system. Fresenius Environ Bull (in press)

  • Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G (1996) Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbali Municipality (2002) Saibler landfill site environmental impact assessment report, Torbali, Izmir (in Turkish)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. Dr. Sevki Filiz and Associate Prof. Dr. M. Yalcin Koca for their support throughout the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Celalettin Simsek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simsek, C., Kincal, C. & Gunduz, O. A solid waste disposal site selection procedure based on groundwater vulnerability mapping. Environ Geol 49, 620–633 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-005-0111-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-005-0111-2

Keywords

Navigation