Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Shifting Species Interaction in Soil Microbial Community and Its Influence on Ecosystem Functions Modulating

  • Soil Microbiology
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The supportive and negative evidence for the stress gradient hypothesis (SGH) led to an ongoing debate among ecologists and called for new empirical and theoretical work. In this study, we took various biological soil crust (BSCs) samples along a spatial gradient with four environmental stress levels to examine the fitness of SGH in microbial interactions and evaluate its influence on biodiversity–function relationships in BSCs. A new assessment method of species interactions within hard-cultured invisible soil community was employed, directly based on denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis fingerprint images. The results showed that biotic interactions in soil phototroph community dramatically shifted from facilitation to dominant competition with the improvement of microhabitats. It offered new evidence, which presented a different perspective on the hypothesis that the relative importance of facilitation and competition varies inversely along the gradient of abiotic stress. The path analysis indicated that influence of biotic interactions (r = 0.19, p < 0.05) on ecosystem functions is lower than other community properties (r = 0.62, p < 0.001), including soil moisture, crust coverage, and biodiversity. Furthermore, the correlation between species interactions and community properties was non-significant with low negative influence (r = −0.27, p > 0.05). We demonstrate that the inversion of biotic interaction as a response to the gradient of abiotic stresses existed not only in the visible plant community but also in the soil microbial community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bertness M, Callaway RM (1994) Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9:191–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smit C, Rietkerk M, Wassen MJ (2009) Inclusion of biotic stress (consumer pressure) alters predictions from the stress gradient hypothesis. J Ecol 97:1215–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Valladares F, Lortie CJ (2009) Refining the stress-gradient hypothesis for competition and facilitation in plant communities. J Ecol 97:199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lortie CJ, Callaway RM (2006) Re-analysis of meta-analysis: support for the stress-gradient hypothesis. J Ecol 94:7–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Korner C (2000) Biosphere responses to CO2-enrichment. Ecol Appl 10:1590–1619

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eldridge DJ (1993) Cryptogams, vascular plants, and soil hydrological relations: some preliminary results from the semiarid wood lands of eastern Australia. Great Basin Nat 53:48–58

    Google Scholar 

  7. Belnap J, Kaltenecker JH, Rosentreter R, Williams J, Leonard S, Eldridge DJ (2001) Biological soil crusts: ecology and management (BLM technical reference 1730-2). United States Bureau of Land Management, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. Csotonyi JT, Swiderski J, Stackebrandt E, Yurkov V (2010) A new environment for aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria: biological soil crusts. Environ Microbiol Rep 2:651–656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shepherd UL, Brantley SL, Tarleton CA (2002) Species richness and abundance patterns of microarthropods on cryptobiotic crusts in a pinonejuniper habitat: a call for greater knowledge. J Arid Environ 52:349–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Darby BJ, Neher DA, Belnap J (2007) Ecological maturity of biological soil crust affects belowground nematode community composition. Appl Soil Ecol 35:203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schulten JA (1985) Soil aggregation by cryptogams of a sand prairie. Am J Bot 72:1657–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu CX, Liu YD (2003) Vertical distribution of algae in semi-desert soil of Shapotou area, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Acta Ecol Sin 23:38–44

    Google Scholar 

  13. Belnap J (2003) The world at your feet: desert biological soil crusts. Front Ecol Environ 1:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rossi F, Potrafka RM, Garcia-Pichel F, De Philippis R (2012) The role of the exopolysaccharides in enhancing hydraulic conductivity of biological soil crusts. Soil Biol Biochem 46:33–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Garcia-Pichel F, Lopez-Cortes A, Nübel U (2001) Phylogenetic and morphological diversity of cyanobacteria in soil desert crusts from the Colorado Plateau. Appl Environ Microb 67:1902–1910

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bowker MA, Soliveres S, Maestre FT (2010) Competition increases with abiotic stress and regulates the diversity of biological soil crusts. J Ecol 98:551–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maestre FT, Bowker MA, Escolar C, Puche MD, Soliveres S, Maltez-Mouro S et al (2010) Do biotic interactions modulate ecosystem functioning along stress gradients? Insights from semi-arid plant and biological soil crust communities. Philos T R Soc B 365:2057–2070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stephen JR, McCaig AE, Smith Z, Prosser JI, Embley TM (1996) Molecular diversity of soil and marine 16S rRNA gene sequences related to beta-subgroup ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Appl Environ Microb 62:4147–4154

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wall DH, Fitter A, Paul E (2005) Developing new perspectives from advances in soil biodiversity research. In: Bardgett RD, Usher MB, Hopkins DW (eds) Biological diversity and function in soils. British Ecological Society, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  20. Callaway RM, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Lortiek CJ, Michalet R et al (2002) Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature 417:844–848

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Richardson PJ, MacDougall AS, Stanley AG, Kaye TN, Dunwiddie PW (2012) Inversion of plant dominance–diversity relationships along a latitudinal stress gradient. Ecology 93:1431–1438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guo HY, Pennings SC (2012) Mechanisms mediating plant distributions across estuarine landscapes in a low-latitude tidal estuary. Ecology 93:90–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Daleo P, Iribarne O (2009) Beyond competition: the stress-gradient hypothesis tested in plant–herbivore interactions. Ecology 90:2368–2374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dick RP, Breakwill D, Turco R (1996) Soil enzyme activities and biodiversity measurements as integrating biological indicators. Methods for Assessment of Soil Quality (eds Doran, J.W., & Jones, A.J.), pp. 247–272. Soil Sci Soc Am, Madison.

  25. Badiane NNY, Chotte JL, Pate E, Masse D, Rouland C (2001) Use of soil enzyme activities to monitor soil quality in natural and improved fallows in semi-arid tropical regions. Appl Soil Ecol 18:229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xie ZM, Chen LZ, Li DH, Shen YW, Hu CX, Liu YD (2007) The research on the function of soil filamentous cyanobacteria in desertification control. Acta Hydrobiol Sin 31:886–890

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu YD, Cockell CS, Wang GH, Hu CX, Chen LZ, De Philippis R (2008) Control of lunar and Martian dust-experimental insights from artificial and natural cyanobacterial and algal crusts in the desert of Inner-Mongolia, China. Astrobiology 8:75–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang WB, Liu YD, Li DH, Hu CX, Rao BQ (2009) Feasibility of cyanobacterial inoculation for biological soil crusts formation in desert area. Soil Biol Biochem 41:926–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rao BQ, Liu YD, Wang WB, Hu CX, Li DH, Lan SB (2009) Influence of dew on biomass and photosystem II activity of cyanobacterial crusts in the Hopq Desert, northwest China. Soil Biol Biochem 41:2387–2393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Maestre FT, Escudero A, Martinez I, Guerrero C, Rubio A (2005) Does spatial patterning matter to ecosystem functioning? Insights from biological soil crusts. Funct Ecol 19:566–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bowker MA, Mau RL, Maestre FT, Escolar C, Castillo-Monroy AP (2011) Functional profiles reveal unique ecological roles of various biological soil crust organisms. Funct Ecol 25:787–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bao SD (2000) The soil agricultural and chemical analysis. Chinese Agricultural Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liebig MA, Gross J, Kronberg SL, Hanson JD, Frank AB, Phillips RL (2006) Soil response to long-term grazing in the northern Great Plains of North America. Agric Ecosyst Environ 115:270–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Qi YC, Dong YS, Jin Z, Peng Q, Xiao SS, He YT (2010) Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients and respiration in the desertified grasslands of Inner-Mongolia, China. Pedosphere 20:655–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tang DS, Wang WB, Li DH, Hu CX, Liu YD (2007) Effects of artificial algal crust on soil enzyme activities of Hopq desert, China. Acta Hydrobiol Sin 31:339–344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Guan SY (1986) Soil enzyme and its researching methods. Agricultural Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  37. Li FD (1996) Experimental methods of agriculture microbiology. Chinese Agricultural Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nübel U, Garcia-Pichel F, Muyzer G (1997) PCR primers to amplify 16S rRNA genes from cyanobacteria. Appl Environ Microb 63:3327–3332

    Google Scholar 

  39. Muyzer G, Dewaal EC, Uitterlinden AG (1993) Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16 s ribosomal-RNA. Appl Environ Microb 59:695–700

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Muhling M, Woolven-Allen J, Murrell JC, Joint I (2008) Improved group-specific PCR primers for denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of the genetic diversity of complex microbial communities. ISME 2:379–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gotelli NJ (2000) Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 81:2606–2621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL (1997) EcoSim: null models software for ecology. In: Annual meeting of the Ecological Society of America held jointly with the nature conservancy on changing ecosystems: natural and human influences. Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. Bull Ecol Soc Am 78:96

    Google Scholar 

  43. Smouse PE, Long JC, Sokal RR (1986) Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst Zool 35:627–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shipley B (2001) Cause and correlation in biology: a users guide to path analysis, structural equations and causal inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  45. Goslee SC, Urban DL (2007) The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J Stat Soft 22:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  46. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MJM Software Design, Gleneden Beach

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bowker MA (2007) Biological soil crust rehabilitation in theory and practice: an underexploited opportunity. Restor Ecol 15:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cole C, Stark LR, Bonine ML, McLetchie DN (2010) Transplant survivorship of bryophyte soil crusts in the Mojave Desert. Restor Ecol 18:198–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bowker MA, Maestre FT, Escolar C (2010) Biological crusts as a model system for examining the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 42:405–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Whitford WG (2002) Ecology of desert systems. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  51. Castillo-Monroy AP, Bowker MA, Maestre FT, Rodriguez-Echeverria S, Martinez I, Barraza-Zepeda CE et al (2011) Relationships between biological soil crusts, bacterial diversity and abundance, and ecosystem functioning: Insights from a semi-arid Mediterranean environment. J Veg Sci 22:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Brooker RW, Callaghan TV (1998) The balance between positive and negative plant interactions and its relationship to environmental gradients: a model. Oikos 81:196–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by National Key Technology R&D Program of China (2009BAC54B01), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41071041), and 2010-2012 China–Italy Executive Program for Scientific and Technological Cooperation (Project NRP 9).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongding Liu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 2636 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, H., Colica, G., Wu, Pp. et al. Shifting Species Interaction in Soil Microbial Community and Its Influence on Ecosystem Functions Modulating. Microb Ecol 65, 700–708 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0171-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0171-2

Keywords

Navigation