Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring the Potential for Actinobacteria as Defensive Symbionts in Fungus-Growing Termites

  • Host Microbe Interactions
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In fungus-growing termites, fungi of the subgenus Pseudoxylaria threaten colony health through substrate competition with the termite fungus (Termitomyces). The potential mechanisms with which termites suppress Pseudoxylaria have remained unknown. Here we explore if Actinobacteria potentially play a role as defensive symbionts against Pseudoxylaria in fungus-growing termites. We sampled for Actinobacteria from 30 fungus-growing termite colonies, spanning the three main termite genera and two geographically distant sites. Our isolations yielded 360 Actinobacteria, from which we selected subsets for morphological (288 isolates, grouped in 44 morphotypes) and for 16S rRNA (35 isolates, spanning the majority of morphotypes) characterisation. Actinobacteria were found throughout all sampled nests and colony parts and, phylogenetically, they are interspersed with Actinobacteria from origins other than fungus-growing termites, indicating lack of specificity. Antibiotic-activity screening of 288 isolates against the fungal cultivar and competitor revealed that most of the Actinobacteria-produced molecules with antifungal activity. A more detailed bioassay on 53 isolates, to test the specificity of antibiotics, showed that many Actinobacteria inhibit both Pseudoxylaria and Termitomyces, and that the cultivar fungus generally is more susceptible to inhibition than the competitor. This suggests that either defensive symbionts are not present in the system or that they, if present, represent a subset of the community isolated. If so, the antibiotics must be used in a targeted fashion, being applied to specific areas by the termites. We describe the first discovery of an assembly of antibiotic-producing Actinobacteria occurring in fungus-growing termite nests. However, due to the diversity found, and the lack of both phylogenetic and bioactivity specificity, further work is necessary for a better understanding of the putative role of antibiotic-producing bacteria in the fungus-growing termite mutualistic system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aanen DK, de Fine Licht HH, Debets AJM, Kerstes NAG, Hoekstra RF, Boomsma JJ (2009) High symbiont relatedness stabilizes mutualistic cooperation in fungus-growing termites. Science 326:1103–1106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aanen DK, Ros VID, de Fine Licht HH, Mitchell J, de Beer ZW, Slippers B, Rouland-Lefèvre C, Boomsma JJ (2007) Patterns of interaction specificity of fungus-growing termites and Termitomyces symbionts in South Africa. BMC Evol Biol 7:115. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boomsma JJ, Aanen DK (2009) Rethinking crop-disease management in fungus-growing ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:17611–17612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cafaro MJ, Poulsen M, Little AE, Price SL, Gerardo NM, Wong B, Stuart AE, Larget B, Abbot P, Currie CR (2011) Specificity in the symbiotic association between fungus-growing ants and protective Pseudonocardia bacteria. Proc R Soc B 278(1713):1814–1822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Currie CR, Poulsen M, Mendenhall J, Boomsma JJ, Billen J (2006) Coevolved crypts and exocrine glands support mutualistic bacteria in fungus-growing ants. Science 311:81–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Currie CR, Scott JA, Summerbell RC, Malloch D (1999) Fungus-growing ants use antibiotic-producing bacteria to control garden parasites. Nature 398:701–704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fields MW, Yan TF, Rhee SK, Carroll SL, Jardine PM, Watson DB, Criddle CS, Zhou JZ (2005) Impacts on microbial communities and cultivable isolates from groundwater contaminated with high levels of nitric acid–uranium waste. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53:417–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuller CA (2007) Fungistatic activity of freshly killed termite, Nasutitermes acajutlae, soldiers in the Caribbean. J Insect Sci 7:1–8

  9. Goodfellow M, Williams ST (1983) Ecology of Actinomycetes. Annu Rev Microbiol 37:189–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Grubbs KJ, Biedermann PH, Suen G, Adams SM, Moeller JA, Klassen JL, Goodwin LA, Woyke T, Munk AC, Bruce D, Detter C, Tapia R, Han CS, Currie CR (2011) Genome sequence of Streptomyces griseus strain XylebKG-1, an Ambrosia beetle-associated actinomycete. J Bacteriol 193:2890–2891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Guedegbe HJ, Miambi E, Pando A, Houngnandan P, Rouland-Lefèvre C (2009) Molecular diversity and host specificity of termite-associated Xylaria. Mycologia 101:686–691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsieh HM, Lin CR, Fang MJ, Rogers JD, Fournier J, Lechat C, Ju YM (2010) Phylogenetic status of Xylaria subgenus Pseudoxylaria among taxa of the subfamily Xylarioideae (Xylariaceae) and phylogeny of the taxa involved in the subfamily. Mol Phylogenet Evol 54:957–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hsu SC, Lockwood JL (1975) Powdered chitin as a selective medium for enumeration of actinomycetes in water and soil. Appl Microbiol 29:422–426

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hulcr J, Adams AS, Raffa K, Hofstetter RW, Klepzig KD, Currie CR (2011) Presence and diversity of Streptomyces in Dendroctonus and sympatric bark beetle galleries across North America. Microb Ecol 61:759–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones JA (1990) Termites, soil fertility and carbon cycling in dry tropical Africa: a hypothesis. J Trop Ecol 6:291–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaltenpoth M (2009) Actinobacteria as mutualists: general healthcare for insects? Trends Microbiol 17:529–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaltenpoth M, Göttler W, Herzner G, Strohm E (2005) Symbiotic bacteria protect wasp larvae from fungal infestation. Curr Biol 15:475–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Katoh H, Miura T, Maekawa K, Shinzato N, Matsumoto T (2002) Genetic variation of symbiotic fungi cultivated by the macrotermitine termite Odontotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Termitidae) in the Ryukyu Archipelago. Mol Ecol 11:1565–1572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Konaté S, Le Roux X, Verdier B, Lepage M (2003) Effect of underground fungus-growing termites on carbon dioxide emission at the point- and landscape-scales in an African savanna. Funct Ecol 17:305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kroiss J, Kaltenpoth M, Schneider B, Schwinger MG, Hertweck C, Maddula RK, Strohm E, Svatos A (2010) Symbiotic streptomycetes provide antibiotic combination prophylaxis for wasp offspring. Nat Chem Biol 6:261–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lamberty M, Zachary D, Lanot R, Bordereau C, Robert A, Hoffmann JA, Bulet P (2001) Insect Immunity. Constitutive expression of a cysteine-rich antifungal and a linear antibacterial peptide in a termite insect. J Biol Chem 276:4085–4092

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lane DJ (1991) 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M (eds) Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Wiley, New York, pp 115–175

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lepage M (1984) Distribution, density and evolution of Macrotermes bellicosus nests (Isoptera, Macrotermitinae) in the northeast of Ivory-Coast. J Anim Ecol 53:107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leuthold RH, Badertscher S, Imboden H (1989) The inoculation of newly formed fungus comb with Termitomyces in Macrotermes colonies (Isoptera, Macrotermitinae). Insectes Sociaux 36:328–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mando A, Brussaard L (1999) Contribution of termites to the breakdown of straw under Sahelian conditions. Biol Fertil Soils 29:332–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moriya S, Inoue T, Ohkuma M, Yaovapa T, Johjima T, Suwanarit P, Sangwanit U, Vongkaluang C, Noparatnaraporn N, Kudo T (2005) Fungal community analysis of fungus gardens in termite nests. Microb Environ 20:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mueller UG, Gerardo NM, Aanen DK, Six DL, Schultz TR (2005) The evolution of agriculture in insects. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:563–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nobre T, Kone NA, Konate S, Linsenmair KE, Aanen DK (2011) Dating the fungus-growing termites’ mutualism shows a mixture between ancient codiversification and recent symbiont dispersal across divergent hosts. Mol Ecol 20:2619–2627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nobre T, Rouland-Lefevre C, Aanen D (2011) Comparative biology of fungus cultivation in termites and ants. In: Bignell DE, Roisin Y, Lo N (eds) Biology of termites: a modern synthesis. Springer, New York, p 576

    Google Scholar 

  30. Oh DC, Poulsen M, Currie CR, Clardy J (2009) Dentigerumycin: a bacterial mediator of an ant–fungus symbiosis. Nat Chem Biol 5:391–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Poulsen M, Cafaro MJ, Erhardt DP, Little AEF, Gerardo NM, Tebbets B, Klein BS, Currie CR (2010) Variation in Pseudonocardia antibiotic defence helps govern parasite-induced morbidity in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Environ Microbiol Rep 2:534–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Poulsen M, Currie CR (2010) Symbiont interactions in a tripartite mutualism: exploring the presence and impact of antagonism between two fungus-growing ant mutualists. PLoS One 5:e8748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Poulsen M, Erhardt DP, Molinaro DJ, Lin TL, Currie CR (2007) Antagonistic bacterial interactions help shape host-symbiont dynamics within the fungus-growing ant-microbe mutualism. PLoS One 2:e960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Riesenfeld CS, Schloss PD, Handelsman J (2004) Metagenomics: genomic analysis of microbial communities. Annu Rev Genet 38:525–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rogers JD (2000) Thoughts and musings on tropical Xylariaceae. Mycol Res 104:1412–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rogers JD, Ju YM, Lehmann J (2005) Some Xylaria species on termite nests. Mycologia 97:914–923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method—a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic tress. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sands WA (1960) The initiation of fungus comb construction in laboratory colonies of Ancistrotermes guineensis (Silvestri). Insectes Sociaux 7:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sands WA (1969) The association of termites and fungi. In: Krishna K, Weesner FM (eds) Biology of termites. Vol. 1. Academic, New York, pp 495–524

    Google Scholar 

  40. Scott JJ, Oh DC, Yuceer MC, Klepzig KD, Clardy J, Currie CR (2008) Bacterial protection of beetle–fungus mutualism. Science 322:63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Sen R, Ishak HD, Estrada D, Dowd SE, Hong EK, Mueller UG (2009) Generalized antifungal activity and 454-screening of Pseudonocardia and Amycolatopsis bacteria in nests of fungus-growing ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:17805–17810

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Shinzato N, Muramatsu M, Watanabe Y, Matsui T (2005) Termite-regulated fungal monoculture in fungus combs of a macrotermitine termite Odontotermes formosanus. Zool Sci 22:917–922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Staley JT (2006) The bacterial species dilemma and the genomic-phylogenetic species concept. Phil Trans R Soc B 361:1899–1909

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) Mega5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739

    Google Scholar 

  45. Thomas RJ (1987) Distribution of Termitomyces Heim and other fungi in the nests and major workers of Macrotermes bellicosus (Smeathman) in Nigeria. Soil Biol Biochem 19:329–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. van Valen L (1973) A new evolutionary law. Evol Theory 1:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  47. Vartoukian SR, Palmer RM, Wade WG (2010) Strategies for culture of ‘unculturable’ bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 309:1574–6968

    Google Scholar 

  48. Visser AA (2011) On the ecology and evolution of microorganisms associated with fungus-growing termites. PhD-thesis. university of Wageningen, 176 pp

  49. Visser AA, Kooij P, Debets AJM, Kuyper TW, Aanen DK (2011) Pseudoxylaria as stowaway of the fungus-growing termite nest: interaction asymmetry between Pseudoxylaria, Termitomyces and free-living relatives. Fungal Ecol 4:322–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Visser AA, Ros VID, de Beer ZW, Debets AJM, Hartog E, Kuyper TW, Læssøe T, Slippers B, Aanen DK (2009) Levels of specificity of Xylaria species associated with fungus-growing termites: a phylogenetic approach. Mol Ecol 18:553–567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Waksman SA, Schatz A (1945) Strain specificity and production of antibiotic substances. VI. Strain variation and production of streptothricin by Actinomyces lavendulae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 31:208–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Waksman SA, Schatz AR, Reynolds DM (2010) Production of antibiotic substances by Actinomycetes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1213:112–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wood TG, Thomas RJ (1989) The mutualistic association between Macrotermitinae and Termitomyces. In: Wilding N, Collins NM, Hammond PM, Webber JF (eds) Insect–fungus interactions. Academic, London, pp 69–92

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Thomas W. Kuyper for valuable comments on the manuscript. We are grateful to Michael J. Wingfield, Z. Wilhelm de Beer and colleagues at the Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), South Africa, for hosting and welcoming us to use the laboratory facilities at FABI. Thanks go to Jannette D. Mitchell for showing us sampling sites and to the Oerlemans family for allowing us to sample termite mounds on their property. A.A.V. was supported by a fellowship from the C.T. de Wit Graduate School of Production Ecology & Resource Conservation (PE&RC), Wageningen University, the Netherlands; D.K.A. was funded by a Vidi grant by the Dutch Science Foundation (NWO-ALW) and a grant of the C.T. de Wit Graduate School PE&RC; T.N. was funded by a Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme (IEF Project No. 220077), C.R.C. and M.P. were supported by the US DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE BER Office of Science DE-FC02-07ER64494) and by a National Science Foundation grant DEB-0747002 awarded to C.R.C, and M.P. was supported by the Carlsberg Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna A. Visser.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary TableS1

Overview of sampled termite colonies and isolated strains. *Not sampled for Actinobacteria. (DOC 76 kb)

Supplementary Table S2

Overview of Actinobacteria showing isolation details, assigned morphotype (see main text for details), and strain codes used in the bioassays. (DOC 740 kb)

Supplementary Table S3

Complete data of screening bioassay. Effects (in millimetres) of Actinobacteria AV151-AV288 on Pseudoxylaria (P2) and Termitomyces (T1). Strains that were also tested in the detailed bioassay, selected because of their effect in this screening assay on either Pseudoxylaria (P), Termitomyces (T) or both (P and T), are shown in bold. (DOC 355 kb)

Supplementary Table S4

Sequenced Actinobacteria strains from fungus-growing termite included in the estimation of the Neighbour Joining tree: First BLAST-hit of sequenced strains with strain name, ecological and geographical origins (if known). The table also shows the closest match to type strains from an RDP Type strain search. (DOC 128 kb)

Supplementary Table S5

Complete data for the detailed bioassay. Average effects of Actinobacteria on Pseudoxylaria and Termitomyces. Page 1 shows the average effects of Actinobacteria on Pseudoxylaria and Termitomyces in millimetres zone of inhibition and zone of effect. Page 2 gives the effects per individual fungal strain, in addition to the total zone of effect per strain, all in millimetres. (DOC 251 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Visser, A.A., Nobre, T., Currie, C.R. et al. Exploring the Potential for Actinobacteria as Defensive Symbionts in Fungus-Growing Termites. Microb Ecol 63, 975–985 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9987-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9987-4

Keywords

Navigation