Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantifying the contribution of 18F-FDG PET to the diagnostic assessment of pediatric patients with fever of unknown origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) in the diagnostic assessment of pediatric fever of unknown origin is not known, and evidence from adults is not applicable.

Objective

To quantify the contribution of 18F-FDG PET to pediatric fever of unknown origin, considering its diagnostic limitations.

Materials and methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to Feb. 18, 2021. We included studies on patients with pediatric fever of unknown origin presenting sufficient data to calculate the likelihood of achieving definite diagnosis (based on pathology or clinical follow-up) between those with abnormal PET findings versus those with normal PET findings. We assessed the risk of bias using a modified Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale and quantified the value of PET by pooling the likelihood of achieving definite diagnosis using a random-effects model.

Results

We included 6 studies and found that pediatric patients with abnormal PET findings were about 17 times more likely to achieve definite diagnoses than those with normal PET findings (odds ratio [OR]: 16.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.0–35, P < 0.00001). Sensitivity analyses using a fixed-effect model (OR 16.91, 95% CI 8.1–35, P < 0.0001) or removing one study at a time (OR 12–20, 95% CI lower bound 3.8–8.6, 95% CI upper bound 33–45, P < 0.0001) did not significantly alter the results. Sample size (interaction P = 0.75), imaging modality (interaction P = 0.29), length of follow-up (interaction P = 0.37), fever of unknown origin subclasses (interaction P = 0.89) and geographical areas (interaction P = 0.74) of studies showed no statistically significant influence on the results.

Conclusion

18F-FDG PET is a promising approach in the diagnostic work-up of pediatric fever of unknown origin. Further studies are warranted to support routine use in clinical care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Petersdorf RG, Beeson PB (1961) Fever of unexplained origin: report on 100 cases. Medicine 40:1–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Finkelstein JA, Christiansen CL, Platt R (2000) Fever in pediatric primary care: occurrence, management, and outcomes. Pediatrics 105:260–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenes DS, Harper MB (1999) Low risk of bacteremia in febrile children with recognizable viral syndromes. Pediatr Infect Dis 18:258–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pijl JP, Kwee TC, Legger GE et al (2020) Role of FDG-PET/CT in children with fever of unknown origin. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 47:1596–1604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Durack DT, Street AC (1991) Fever of unknown origin–reexamined and redefined. Curr Clin Top Infect Dis 11:35–51

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brewis EG (1965) Child care in general practice. undiagnosed fever. Br Med J 1:107–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chow A, Robinson JL (2011) Fever of unknown origin in children: a systematic review. World J Pediatr 7:5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dechovitz AB, Moffet HL (1968) Classification of acute febrile illnesses in childhood. Clin Pediatr 7:649–653

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kliegman RM (2011) Nelson textbook of pediatrics, 19th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  10. Parisi MT (2011) Functional imaging of infection: conventional nuclear medicine agents and the expanding role of 18-F-FDG PET. Pediatr Radiol 41:803–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Servaes S (2011) PET-CT in the evaluation of FUO. Pediatr Radiol Suppl 1:S329–S330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2025-3(accessed16February,2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wright WF, Auwaerter PG, Dibble EH et al (2020) Imaging a fever - redefining the role of 18FDG-PET/CT in fever of unknown origin investigations. Clin Infect Dis 72:1279–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jamar F, Buscombe J, Chiti A et al (2013) EANM/SNMMI guideline for 18F-FDG use in inflammation and infection. J Nucl Med 54:647–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meller J, Sahlmann CO, Scheel AK (2007) 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in fever of unknown origin. J Nucl Med 48:35–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Besson FL, Chaumet-Riffaud P, Playe M et al (2016) Contribution of (18)F-FDG PET in the diagnostic assessment of fever of unknown origin (FUO): a stratification-based meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 43:1887–1895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dong M-J, Zhao K, Liu Z-F et al (2011) A meta-analysis of the value of fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/PET-CT in the evaluation of fever of unknown origin. Eur J Radiol 80:834–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bharucha T, Rutherford A, Skeoch S et al (2017) Diagnostic yield of FDG-PET/CT in fever of unknown origin: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and Delphi exercise. Clin Radiol 72:764–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li Q, Tian R, Sun X (2021) More evidence is warranted to establish the role of 18FDG-PET/CT in fever of unknown origin (FUO) investigations among children. Clin Infect Dis 73:e2842–e2844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jasper N, Däbritz J, Frosch M et al (2010) Diagnostic value of [(18)F]-FDG PET/CT in children with fever of unknown origin or unexplained signs of inflammation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:136–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Blokhuis GJ, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Diender MG et al (2014) Diagnostic value of FDG-PET/(CT) in children with fever of unknown origin and unexplained fever during immune suppression. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41:1916–1923

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang L, Cheng M-F, Jou S-T et al (2016) Search of unknown fever focus using PET in critically ill children with complicated underlying diseases. Pediatr Crit Care Med 17:e58-65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Simons KS, Pickkers P, Bleeker-Rovers CP et al (2010) F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with CT in critically ill patients with suspected infection. Intensive Care Med 36:504–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sturm E, Rings EHHM, Schölvinck EH et al (2006) Fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography contributes to management of pediatric liver transplantation candidates with fever of unknown origin. Liver Transpl 12:1698–1704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang J, Zhuang H (2015) The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of pediatric transplant patients. Hell J Nucl Med 18:136–139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. El-Haddad G, Alavi A, Zhuang H (2006) Value of 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET in the management of patients with fever of unknown origin. PET Clin 1:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Houseni M, Chamroonrat W, Servaes S et al (2008) Applications of PET/CT in pediatric patients with fever of unknown origin. PET Clin 3:605–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang J, Zhuang H, Servaes S (2012) Fever of unknown origin: the roles of FDG PET or PET/CT. PET Clin 7:181–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Vali R, Alessio A, Balza R et al (2021) SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline on Pediatric (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Oncology 1.0. J Nucl Med 62:99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2008). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2008/09-86753_Report_2008_GA_Report.pdf. Accessed 12 March 2021

  31. Nield L, Kamat D (2011) Fever without a focus. In: Kliegman R (ed) Nelson textbook of pediatrics, 19th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 896–902

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kjaer A, Lebech AM, Eigtved A, Højgaard L (2004) Fever of unknown origin: prospective comparison of diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET and 111In-granulocyte scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31:622–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Glaudemans AW, Quintero AM, Signore A (2012) PET/MRI in infectious and inflammatory diseases: will it be a useful improvement? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39:745–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant 2021SCU12008), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant 2020M683342), Post-Doctor Research Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (grant 2020HXBH147), Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (grant 2019YFS0373) and the 1·3·5 Project for Disciplines of Excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (grant ZYYC08003). The funding sources had no role in the design of this study and will not have any role during its execution, analyses, interpretation of the data or decision to submit results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Sun.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Q., Tian, R., Wang, H. et al. Quantifying the contribution of 18F-FDG PET to the diagnostic assessment of pediatric patients with fever of unknown origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Radiol 52, 1500–1511 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05333-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05333-7

Keywords

Navigation