Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative MRI for hepatic fat fraction and T2* measurement in pediatric patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in children. The gold standard for diagnosis is liver biopsy. MRI is a non-invasive imaging method to provide quantitative measurement of hepatic fat content. The methodology is particularly appealing for the pediatric population because of its rapidity and radiation-free imaging techniques.

Objective

To develop a multi-point Dixon MRI method with multi-interference models (multi-fat-peak modeling and bi-exponential T2* correction) for accurate hepatic fat fraction (FF) and T2* measurements in pediatric patients with NAFLD.

Materials and methods

A phantom study was first performed to validate the accuracy of the MRI fat fraction measurement by comparing it with the chemical fat composition of the ex-vivo pork liver-fat homogenate. The most accurate model determined from the phantom study was used for fat fraction and T2* measurements in 52 children and young adults referred from the pediatric hepatology clinic with suspected or identified NAFLD. Separate T2* values of water (T2*W) and fat (T2*F) components derived from the bi-exponential fitting were evaluated and plotted as a function of fat fraction. In ten patients undergoing liver biopsy, we compared histological analysis of liver fat fraction with MRI fat fraction.

Results

In the phantom study the 6-point Dixon with 5-fat-peak, bi-exponential T2* modeling demonstrated the best precision and accuracy in fat fraction measurements compared with other methods. This model was further calibrated with chemical fat fraction and applied in patients, where similar patterns were observed as in the phantom study that conventional 2-point and 3-point Dixon methods underestimated fat fraction compared to the calibrated 6-point 5-fat-peak bi-exponential model (P < 0.0001). With increasing fat fraction, T2*W (27.9 ± 3.5 ms) decreased, whereas T2*F (20.3 ± 5.5 ms) increased; and T2*W and T2*F became increasingly more similar when fat fraction was higher than 15–20%. Histological fat fraction measurements in ten patients were highly correlated with calibrated MRI fat fraction measurements (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.90 with P = 0.0004).

Conclusion

Liver MRI using multi-point Dixon with multi-fat-peak and bi-exponential T2* modeling provided accurate fat quantification in children and young adults with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and may be used to screen at-risk or affected individuals and to monitor disease progress noninvasively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matthiessen J, Velsing Groth M, Fagt S et al (2008) Prevalence and trends in overweight and obesity among children and adolescents in Denmark. Scand J Public Health 36:153–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ji CY, Cooperative Study on Childhood Obesity: Working Group on Obesity (2008) The prevalence of childhood overweight/obesity and the epidemic changes in 1985–2000 for Chinese school-age children and adolescents. Obes Rev 9:78–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Giorgio V, Prono F, Graziano F et al (2013) Pediatric non alcoholic fatty liver disease: old and new concepts on development, progression, metabolic insight and potential treatment targets. BMC Pediatr 13:40

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Day CP (2011) Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a massive problem. Clin Med 11:176–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma X, Holalkere NS, Kambadakone RA et al (2009) Imaging-based quantification of hepatic fat: methods and clinical applications. Radiographics 29:1253–1277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fishbein M, Castro F, Cheruku S et al (2005) Hepatic MRI for fat quantitation: its relationship to fat morphology, diagnosis, and ultrasound. J Clin Gastroenterol 39:619–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee SS, Park SH, Kim HJ et al (2010) Non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis: prospective comparison of the accuracy of imaging examinations. J Hepatol 52:579–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mottin CC, Moretto M, Padoin AV et al (2004) The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg 14:635–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park SH, Kim PN, Kim KW et al (2006) Macrovesicular hepatic steatosis in living liver donors: use of CT for quantitative and qualitative assessment. Radiology 239:105–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cassidy FH, Yokoo T, Aganovic L et al (2009) Fatty liver disease: MR imaging techniques for the detection and quantification of liver steatosis. Radiographics 29:231–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dixon WT (1984) Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 153:189–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Levenson H, Greensite F, Hoefs J et al (1991) Fatty infiltration of the liver: quantification with phase-contrast MR imaging at 1.5 T vs. biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:307–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fishbein MH, Gardner KG, Potter CJ et al (1997) Introduction of fast MR imaging in the assessment of hepatic steatosis. Magn Reson Imaging 15:287–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yokoo T, Bydder M, Hamilton G et al (2009) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: diagnostic and fat-grading accuracy of low-flip-angle multiecho gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 251:67–76

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Reeder SB, Pineda AR, Wen Z et al (2005) Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL): application with fast spin-echo imaging. Magn Reson Med 54:636–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reeder SB, McKenzie CA, Pineda AR et al (2007) Water-fat separation with IDEAL gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:644–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu CY, McKenzie CA, Yu H et al (2007) Fat quantification with IDEAL gradient echo imaging: correction of bias from T(1) and noise. Magn Reson Med 58:354–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yokoo T, Shiehmorteza M, Hamilton G et al (2011) Estimation of hepatic proton-density fat fraction by using MR imaging at 3.0 T. Radiology 258:749–759

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhong X, Nickel M, Kannengiesser SAR et al (2013) Fat and iron quantification using a multi-step adaptive fitting approach with multi-echo GRE imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. doi:10.1002/mrm.25054

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee SS, Lee Y, Kim N et al (2011) Hepatic fat quantification using chemical shift MR imaging and MR spectroscopy in the presence of hepatic iron deposition: validation in phantoms and in patients with chronic liver disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:1390–1398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Permutt Z, Le TA, Peterson MR et al (2012) Correlation between liver histology and novel magnetic resonance imaging in adult patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease — MRI accurately quantifies hepatic steatosis in NAFLD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 36:22–29

  22. Bydder M, Yokoo T, Hamilton G et al (2008) Relaxation effects in the quantification of fat using gradient echo imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 26:347–359

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bydder M, Shiehmorteza M, Yokoo T et al (2010) Assessment of liver fat quantification in the presence of iron. Magn Reson Imaging 28:767–776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu H, Shimakawa A, McKenzie CA et al (2008) Multiecho water-fat separation and simultaneous R2* estimation with multifrequency fat spectrum modeling. Magn Reson Med 60:1122–1134

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. John Killefer, Dr. Anna Dilger and Diana Pezza in the Meat Science Lab at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for their generous help in making pork liver-fat homogenate and proximate analysis for chemical fat composition measurements. Our thanks also go to Dr. Hector Melin-Aldana for providing and reviewing the histopathological analysis of liver biopsy images.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Deng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, J., Fishbein, M.H., Rigsby, C.K. et al. Quantitative MRI for hepatic fat fraction and T2* measurement in pediatric patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Pediatr Radiol 44, 1379–1387 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3024-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3024-y

Keywords

Navigation