Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of gadolinium on hepatic fat quantification using multi-echo reconstruction technique with T2* correction and estimation

  • Magnetic Resonance
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To determine whether hepatic fat quantification is affected by administration of gadolinium using a multiecho reconstruction technique with T2* correction and estimation.

Methods

Forty-eight patients underwent the investigational sequence for hepatic fat quantification at 3.0T MRI once before and twice after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg). A one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with pairwise comparisons was conducted to evaluate the systematic bias of fat fraction (FF) and R2* measurements between three acquisitions. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreements between pre- and post-contrast FF measurements in the liver. A P value <0.05 indicated statistically significant difference.

Results

FF measurements of liver, spleen and spine revealed no significant systematic bias between the three measurements (P > 0.05 for all). Good agreements (95 % confidence interval) of FF measurements were demonstrated between pre-contrast and post-contrast1 (−0.49 %, 0.52 %) and post-contrast2 (−0.83 %, 0.77 %). R2* increased in liver and spleen (P = 0.039, P = 0.01) after administration of gadolinium.

Conclusions

Although under the impact of an increased R2* in liver and spleen post-contrast, the investigational sequence can still obtain stable fat quantification. Therefore, it could be applied post-contrast to substantially increase the efficiency of MR examination and also provide a backup for the occasional failure of FF measurements pre-contrast.

Key Points

• Fat quantification with IDEAL-based investigational sequence remains stable after gadolinium administration.

• It can be integrated into tri-phase liver MRI without adding scan time.

• This helps optimize MR protocols and provides more useful information for clinicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ARC:

Auto-calibrating reconstruction for cartesian acquisition

DCE:

Dynamic contrast enhanced

FF:

Fat fraction

Gd-CM:

Gadolinium-based contrast media

IDEAL:

Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

MRS:

MR spectroscopy

ROIs:

Regions of interest

SD:

Standard deviation

SPIO:

Super paramagnetic iron oxide

References

  1. Reeder SB, Sirlin C (2010) Quantification of liver fat with magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 18:337–357

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Matteoni CA, Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Boparai N, Liu YC, McCullough AJ (1999) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a spectrum of clinical and pathological severity. Gastroenterology 116:1413–1419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gramlich T, Kleiner DE, McCullough AJ, Matteoni CA, Boparai N, Younossi ZM (2004) Pathologic features associated with fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hum Pathol 35:196–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Falck-Ytter Y, Younossi ZM, Marchesini G, McCullough AJ (2001) Clinical features and natural history of nonalcoholic steatosis syndromes. Semin Liver Dis 21:17–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A et al (2005) Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 128:1898–1906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bravo A, Sheth S, Chopra S (2001) Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med 344:495–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dixon W (1984) Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 153:189–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glover GH, Schneider E (1991) Three-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with Bo inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med 18:371–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Glover GH (1991) Multipoint Dixon technique for water and fat proton and susceptibility imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1:521–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reeder SB, Wen Z, Yu H et al (2004) Multicoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least squares estimation method. Magn Reson Med 51:35–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reeder SB, Pineda AR, Wen Z et al (2005) Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL): application with fast spin-echo imaging. Magn Reson Med 54:636–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiang Q, An L (1997) Water-fat imaging with direct phase encoding. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:1002–1015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma J (2004) Breath-hold water and fat imaging using a dual-echo two-point Dixon technique with an efficient and robust phase-correction algorithm. Magn Reson Med 52:415–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin J, Sentis M, Puig J et al (1996) Comparison of in-phase and opposed-phase GRE and conventional SE MR pulse sequences in T1-weighted imaging of liver lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:890–897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Siegelman ES, Rosen MA (2001) Imaging of hepatic steatosis. Semin Liver Dis 21:71–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hussain HK, Chenevert TL, Londy FJ et al (2005) Hepatic fat fraction: MR imaging for quantitative measurement and display: early experience. Radiology 237:1048–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ligabue G, Besutti G, Scaglioni R, Stentarelli C, Guaraldi G (2013) MR quantitative biomarkers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: technical evolutions and future trends. Quant Imaging Med Surg 3:192–195

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Karçaaltincaba M, Idilman I, Celik A (2011) Focal sparing of iron and fat in liver tissue in patients with hemosiderosis: diagnosis with combination of R2* relaxometry and proton density fat fraction calculation by MRI. Diagn Interv Radiol 17:323–327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tang A, Tan J, Sun M et al (2013) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis. Radiology 267:422–431

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hines CD, Frydrychowicz A, Hamilton G et al (2011) T1 independent, T2* corrected chemical shift based fat-water separation with multi-peak fat spectral modeling is an accurate and precise measure of hepatic steatosis. JMRI 33:873–881

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kukuk GM, Hittatiya K, Sprinkart AM et al (2015) Comparison between modified Dixon MRI techniques, MR spectroscopic relaxometry, and different histologic quantification methods in the assessment of hepatic steatosis. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3703-6

    Google Scholar 

  22. Idilman IS, Aniktar H, Idilman R et al (2013) Hepatic steatosis: quantification by proton density fat fraction with MR imaging versus liver biopsy. Radiology 267:767–775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liau J, Shiehmorteza M, Girard OM, Sirlin CB, Bydder M (2013) Evaluation of MRI fat fraction in the liver and spine pre and post SPIO infusion. Magn Reson Imaging 31:1012–1016

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mashhood A, Railkar R, Yokoo T et al (2013) Reproducibility of hepatic fat fraction measurement by magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:1359–1370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alla V, Bonkovsky HL (2005) Iron in nonhemochromatotic liver disorders. Semin Liver Dis 25:461–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. George DK, Goldwurm S, MacDonald GA et al (1998) Increased hepatic iron concentration in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is associated with increased fibrosis. Gastroenterology 114:311–318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Henninger B, Zoller H, Rauch S et al (2015) Automated two-point dixon screening for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis and siderosis: comparison with R2*-relaxometry and chemical shift-based sequences. Eur Radiol 25:1356–1365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yokoo T, Bydder M, Hamilton G et al (2009) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: diagnostic and fat-grading accuracy of low-flip-angle multiecho gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 251:67–76

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yokoo T, Shiehmorteza M, Hamilton G et al (2011) Estimation of hepatic proton-density fat fraction by using MR imaging at 3.0 T. Radiology 258:749–759

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Schieda N, Ramanathan S, Ryan J, Khanna M, Virmani V, Avruch L (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-echo (in- and opposed-phase) T1-weighted gradient recalled echo for detection and grading of hepatic iron using quantitative and visual assessment. Eur Radiol 24:1437–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chiang HJ, Lin LH, Li CW et al (2014) Magnetic resonance fat quantification in living donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 46:666–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shuter B, Tofts PS, Wang SC, Pope JM (1996) The relaxivity of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA in liver and kidney of the Wister rat. Magn Reson Imaging 14:243–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Meisamy S, Hines CD, Hamilton G et al (2011) Quantification of hepatic steatosis with T1-independent, T2*-corrected MR imaging with spectral modeling of fat: blinded comparison with MR spectroscopy. Radiology 258:767–775

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Xinhuai Wu. The authors of this manuscript thank Ziheng Zhang, Zhenyu Zhou and Yingkui Zhang from GE Healthcare for technical help. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. One of the authors (Jing Zhang) has significant statistical expertise. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study. Methodology: prospective, observational, performed at one institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinhuai Wu.

Additional information

Mingmei Ge and Jing Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ge, M., Zhang, J., Wu, B. et al. Effect of gadolinium on hepatic fat quantification using multi-echo reconstruction technique with T2* correction and estimation. Eur Radiol 26, 1913–1920 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3981-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3981-z

Keywords

Navigation