Skip to main content
Log in

Bare spot of the glenoid fossa in children: incidence and MRI features

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The bare spot of the glenoid fossa is a normal cartilage defect seen frequently in adults. It has been used on arthroscopy as a landmark for the center of the glenoid fossa. There are no reports of this variant in children, but we have noted it on some pediatric clinical shoulder MRI studies.

Objective

Our main purpose is to evaluate the incidence of the bare spot in children and define location and MRI features.

Materials and methods

Shoulder MRI studies (total 570) from 2004 to 2008 were reviewed. Children were divided into two age groups: group 1, 0–10 years (n = 200), group 2, 11–20 years (n = 370).

Results

A total of 12 bare spots (2.1%) were identified; all were seen in group 2. Eight (67%) were central and four were eccentric in the glenoid fossa. All showed a well-marginated focal cartilage defect containing hyperintense joint fluid or contrast agent. Three also had air.

Conclusion

The bare spot is seen in children. The absence in children younger than 10 years and the low incidence in the second decade support the proposed acquired nature. Familiarity with this finding is important so as not to misinterpret it as a pathologic condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guntern DV, Pfirrmann CW, Schmid MR et al (2003) Articular cartilage lesions of the glenohumeral joint: diagnostic effectiveness of MR arthrography and prevalence in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. Radiology 226:165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beltran J, Rosenberg ZS, Chandnani VP et al (1997) Glenohumeral instability: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiographics 17:657–673

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stoller DW (1997) MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint. Radiol Clin North Am 35:97–116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanders TG, Tirman PF, Linares R et al (1999) The glenolabral articular disruption lesion: MR arthrography with arthroscopic correlation. AJR 172:171–175

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu JS, Greenway G, Resnick D (1998) Osteochondral defect of the glenoid fossa: cross-sectional imaging features. Radiology 206:35–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ly JQ, Bui-Mansfield LT, Kline MJ et al (2004) Bare area of the glenoid: magnetic resonance appearance with arthroscopic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:229–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burkhart SS, Debeer JF, Tehrany AM et al (2002) Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability. Arthroscopy 18:488–491

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aigner F, Longato S, Fritsch H et al (2004) Anatomical considerations regarding the “bare spot” of the glenoid cavity. Surg Radiol Anat 26:308–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Resnick D, Kang HS (2007) Shoulder. In: Resnick D, Kang HS (eds) Internal derangements of joints, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 713–1122

    Google Scholar 

  10. Warner JJ, Bowen MK, Deng XH et al (1998) Articular contact patterns of the normal glenohumeral joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7:381–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Wilde LF, Berghs BM, Audenaert E et al (2004) About the variability of the shape of the glenoid cavity. Surg Radiol Anat 26:54–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tena-Arregui J, Barrio-Asensio C, Puerta-Fonolla J et al (2005) Arthroscopic study of the shoulder joint in fetuses. Arthroscopy 21:1114–1119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fealy S, Rodeo SA, Dicarlo EF et al (2000) The developmental anatomy of the neonatal glenohumeral joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:217–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Burkhart SS, Danaceau SM (2000) Articular arc length mismatch as a cause of failed Bankart repair. Arthroscopy 16:740–744

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Burkhart SS, De Beer JF (2000) Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy 16:677–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Sluijs JA, van Ouwerkerk WJ, Manoliu RA et al (2004) Secondary deformities of the shoulder in infants with an obstetrical brachial plexus lesions considered for neurosurgical treatment. Neurosurg Focus 16:E9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen H. Emery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, H.K., Emery, K.H. & Salisbury, S.R. Bare spot of the glenoid fossa in children: incidence and MRI features. Pediatr Radiol 40, 1190–1196 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1494-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1494-0

Keywords

Navigation