Abstract
Background: Neuroangiographic techniques (diagnostic and interventional) can be lengthy and complex and can be associated with high radiation entrance skin doses from fluoroscopy and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Objective: To measure entrance surface doses received by pediatric patients undergoing neuroangiographic procedures and to (1) compare these doses with thresholds for deterministic effects, (2) compare these doses with those reported in adults, and (3) to understand the dose relationships among diagnostic and interventional procedures, DSA and fluoroscopy. Materials and methods: A neurobiplane unit with fluoroscopic and DSA capabilities was used for all neuroangiographic procedures. An automated patient dosimeter, installed on both planes of the unit, calculated maximum surface dose. The dosimeter also recorded the number of angiographic frames and the length of fluoroscopy time for each procedure. Results: This retrospective study analyzed entrance surface doses to 100 pediatric patients, 76 of whom underwent neuroangiographic diagnostic procedures and 24 of whom underwent neuroangiographic interventional procedures. The DSA acquisitions ranged from 44 frames to 1,428 frames per procedure and fluoroscopy times ranged from 1.1 to 85.6 min per procedure. The mean surface dose from fluoroscopy was 68.1 mGy (max: 397.1 mGy) in the frontal (PA) plane; in the lateral (LAT) plane, the mean surface dose was 40.9 mGy (max: 418.5 mGy). The mean surface doses from DSA were 263.1 and 126.9 mGy in the frontal and lateral planes, with maximum doses of 924.4 and 410.1 mGy, respectively. Mean fluoroscopy dose rates were 5.4 mGy/min in the PA plane and 4.7 mGy/min in the LAT plane. The DSA largely contributed to the overall procedural surface dose, accounting for 82% of the combined surface dose in the each of the imaging planes. Conclusion: The surface dose for each procedure measured in this study was found to be below thresholds for deterministic effects. Interventional procedures consistently yield the highest doses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991) Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection, publication 60. Permagon Press, Oxford
Huda W, Peters KR (1994) Radiation-induced temporary epilation after a neuroradiologically guided embolization procedure. Radiology 193:642–644
Miller DL, Balter S, Cole PE, et al (2003) Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study. II. Skin dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:977–990
Mooney RB, McKinstry CS, Kamel HAM (2000) Absorbed dose and deterministic effects to patients from interventional neuroradiology. Br J Radiol 73:745–751
Norbash A, Busick D, Marks M (1996) Techniques for reducing interventional neuroradiological skin dose; tube position and supplemental beam filtration. AJNR 17:41–49
Theodorakou K, Horrocks JA (2003) A study on radiation doses and irradiated areas in cerebral embolisation. Br J Radiol 76:546–552
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (1995) Clarification: recording information in the medical patient’s record that identifies the potential for serious X-ray induced skin injuries. Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Hansson B, Finnbogason T, Schuwert P, et al (1997) Added copper filtration in digital paediatric double-contrast colon examinations: effects on radiation dose and image quality. Eur Radiol 7:1117–1122
Huda W (2004) Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography. Pediatr Radiol [Suppl] 34:S173–S182
Morrell RE, Rogers AT, Jobling JC, et al (2004) Barium enema: use of increased copper filtration to optimize dose and image quality. Br J Radiol 77:116–122
Nicholson R, Tuffee F, Uthappa MC (2000) Skin sparing in interventional radiology: the effect of copper filtration. Br J Radiol 73:36–42
Miller DL, Balter S, Wagner LK, et al (2004) Quality improvement guidelines for recording patient radiation dose in the medical record. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:423–429
Cusma JT, Bell MR, Wondrow MA, et al (1999) Real-time measurement of radiation exposure to patients during diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous interventional procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:427–435
O’Dea TJ, Geise RA, Ritenour ER (1999) The potential for radiation-induced skin damage in interventional neuroradiological procedures: a review of 522 cases using automated dosimetry. Med Phys 26:2027–2033
Johns HE, Cunningham JR (1983) The physics of radiology, 4th edn. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, pp 286–287, 739
Gkanatsios NA, Huda W, Peters KR (2002) Adult patient doses in interventional neuroradiology. Med Phys 29:717–723
Kemerink GJ, Frantzen MJ, Oei K, et al (2002) Patient and occupational dose in neurointerventional procedures. Neuroradiology 44:522–528
Koenig TR, Wolff D, Mettler FA, et al (2001) Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures. 1. Characteristics of radiation injury. AJR 177:13–20
Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT . AJR 176:289–296
Hall EJ (2000) Radiobiology for the radiologist, 5th edn. Lipincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Lewall DB, Riley P, Hassoon AA, et al (1995) A fluoroscopy credentialling programme for orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:442–444
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Swoboda, N.A., Armstrong, D.G., Smith, J. et al. Pediatric patient surface doses in neuroangiography. Pediatr Radiol 35, 859–866 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-1496-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-1496-5