Abstract
Objectives
A national retrospective survey on patient doses was performed by the French Society of Medical physicists to assess reference levels (RLs) in interventional radiology as required by the European Directive 2013/59/Euratom.
Methods
Fifteen interventional procedures in neuroradiology, vascular radiology and osteoarticular procedures were analysed. Kerma area product (KAP), fluoroscopy time (FT), reference air kerma and number of images were recorded for 10 to 30 patients per procedure. RLs were calculated as the 3rd quartiles of the distributions.
Results
Results on 4600 procedures from 36 departments confirmed the large variability in patient dose for the same procedure. RLs were proposed for the four dosimetric estimators and the 15 procedures. RLs in terms of KAP and FT were 90 Gm.cm2 and 11 mins for cerebral angiography, 35 Gy.cm2 and 16 mins for biliary drainage, 75 Gy.cm2 and 6 mins for lower limbs arteriography and 70 Gy.cm2 and 11 mins for vertebroplasty. For these four procedures, RLs were defined according to the complexity of the procedure. For all the procedures, the results were lower than most of those already published.
Conclusions
This study reports RLs in interventional radiology based on a national survey. Continual evolution of practices and technologies requires regular updates of RLs.
Key Points
• Delivered dose in interventional radiology depends on procedure, practice and patient.
• National RLs are proposed for 15 interventional procedures.
• Reference levels (RLs) are useful to benchmark practices and optimize protocols.
• RLs are proposed for kerma area product, air kerma, fluoroscopy time and number of images.
• RLs should be adapted to the procedure complexity and updated regularly.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505
International Commission on Radiological Protection (1996) Radiological protection and safety in medicine. Publication 73. Ann. ICRP 26(2). Pergamon Press, Oxford
International Commission on Radiological Protection (2001) Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: review and additional advice. Ann ICRP 31:33–52
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2012) Reference levels and achievable doses in medical and dental imaging: recommendations for the United States. NCRP report No. 172
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2010) Radiation dose management for fluoroscopically-guided interventional medical procedures. NCRP report No. 168. NCRP, Bethesda
Public Health England (2016) National diagnostic reference levels (guidance). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/diagnostic-radiology-national-diagnostic-reference-levels-ndrls/national-diagnostic-reference-levels-ndrls. Accessed 18 July 2016
Office fédéral de la santé publique (2008) Confédération suisse. Niveaux de référence diagnostiques en radiologie interventionnelle et en cardiologie. Notice R-06-05
Journal officiel de la république française. Arrêté du 24 octobre 2011 relatif aux niveaux de référence diagnostiques en radiologie et en médecine nucléaire. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000025145375&categorieLien=id. Accessed 2 Sept 2016
International Commission on Radiological protection (2007) Radiation protection in medicine. Publication 105. Ann ICRP 37. Pergamon, Oxford
Vaño E, Gonzalez L (2001) Approaches to establishing reference levels in interventional radiology. Radiat Prot Dosim 94:109–112
Balter S, Miller DL, Vaño E et al (2008) A pilot study exploring the possibility of establishing guidance levels in x-ray directed interventional procedures. Med Phys 35:673–680
Bleeser F, Hoornaert MT, Smans K et al (2008) Diagnostic reference levels in angiography and interventional radiology: a Belgian multi-centre study. Radiat Prot Dosim 129:50–55
Aroua A, Rickli H, Stauffer JC et al (2007) How to set up and apply reference levels in fluoroscopy at national level. Eur Radiol 17:1621–1633
International Commission on Radiological protection (201X) Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. ICRP Publication 1XX Ann ICRP 4X(X-X). Draft report
Official Journal of the European Union (2013) Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionizing radiation
Georges JL, Belle L, Etard C et al (2016) Radiation doses to patients in interventional coronary procedures – estimation of updated national reference levels by dose audit. Radiat Prot Dosim. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncw261
International Atomic Energy Agency (2009) Establishing guidance levels in x ray guided medical interventional procedures: a pilot study. Safety Reports Series No. 59. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
Biostatgv (2016) http://marne.u707.jussieu.fr/biostatgv. Accessed 2 Sept 2016
Vaño E, Järvinen H, Kosunen A et al (2008) Patient dose in interventional radiology: a european survey. Radiat Prot Dosim 129:39–45
Kien N, Réhel JL, Etard C, Aubert B (2011) Patient dose during interventional neuroradiology procedures: results from a multi-center study. J Radiol 92:1101–1112
Miller DL, Kwon D, Bonavia GH (2009) reference levels for patient radiation doses in interventional radiology: proposed initial values for US practice. Radiology 253:753–764
D’Ercole L, Thyrion FZ, Bocchiola M, Mantovani L, Klersy C (2012) Proposed local diagnostic reference levels in angiography and interventional neuroradiology and a preliminary analysis according to the complexity of the procedures. Phys Med 28:61–70
Hadid L, Waryn MJ, Ajavon Y, Seror O, Sellier N (2014) Local dose reference levels for abdominal interventional radiology procedures. Poster C-2053, ECR Congress 2014. doi:10.1594/ecr2014/C-2053
Ruiz-Cruces R, Vano E, Carrera-Magarino F et al (2016) Diagnostic reference levels and complexity indices in interventional radiology: a national programme. Eur Radiol 26:4268–4276
Miraglia R, Gerasia R, Maruzzelli L, D'Amico M, Luca A (2016) Radiation doses to operators performing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt using a flat-panel detector-based system and ultrasound guidance for portal vein targeting. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4558-1
Foerth M, Seidenbusch MC, Sadeghi-Azandaryani M, Lechel U, Treitl KM, Treitl M (2015) Typical exposure parameters, organ doses and effective doses for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: comparison of Monte Carlo simulations and direct measurements with an anthropomorphic phantom. Eur Radiol 25:2617–2626
Zotova R, Vassileva J, Hristova J, Pirinen M (2012) A national patient dose survey and setting of reference levels for interventional radiology in Bulgaria. Eur Radiol 22:1240–1249
Vaño E, Fernandez JM, Sanchez RM et al (2013) Patient radiation dose management in the follow-up of potential skin injuries in neuroradiology. Am J Neuroradiol 34:277–282
Magnier F, Réhel JL, Aubert B (2009) Contribution to establishment of reference levels in vascular diagnostic and interventional radiology. J Radiol 90:1259
Pitton MB, Kloeckner R, Schneider J, Ruckes C, Bersch A, Düber C (2012) Radiation exposure in vascular angiographic procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:1487–1495
Acknowledgements
The authors are very grateful to the staff of the 36 imaging departments (medical physicists and radiologists) who took the time to collect and check the data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Jean Paul Beregi.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Ethical approval
Institutional review board approval was not required because this study is a retrospective survey on patient doses to assess reference levels in interventional radiology.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was not required for this study because this study is a retrospective survey on patient doses to assess reference levels in interventional radiology.
Study subjects or cohorts overlap
None of the study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported.
Methodology
• Retrospective
• Not applicable
• Multicentre study
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Etard, C., Bigand, E., Salvat, C. et al. Patient dose in interventional radiology: a multicentre study of the most frequent procedures in France. Eur Radiol 27, 4281–4290 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4780-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4780-5