Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Harmonic US imaging of vesicoureteric reflux in children: usefulness of a second generation US contrast agent

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (VUS) is largely accepted both for the diagnosis and follow-up of vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) in children. Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced second-harmonic VUS in the diagnosis and grading of VUR, using a second-generation contrast agent. Materials and methods: Eighty consecutive children were prospectively studied with contrast-enhanced second-harmonic VUS. All children received a second-generation contrast medium, constituted by phospholipid-stabilized microbubbles of sulphur-hexafluoride (SonoVue, Bracco, Milan, Italy). US monitoring of the bladder, of the retrovesical space and of the kidneys was performed using, alternatively, both tissue-harmonic and contrast-harmonic modes. In those young boys where VUR was depicted at VUS, examination was completed with transperineal, sagittal urethral exploration during micturition. VUR was graded in five steps and diagnoses were compared with voiding cystourethrography (VCUG). Results: VUR was diagnosed in 52 reno-ureteral units with VUS. In 49 of these reno-ureteral units, VCUG confirmed the presence of VUR. In comparison to VUS, sensitivity and negative predictive value of VCUG were inferior. The grade of VUR detected at VUS was higher than that detected at VCUG in three units. In no case was the grade of VUR detected at VCUG higher than the one detected at VUS. The differences between VUS and VCUG in grading VUR were statistically significant (p=0.02). Imaging of the normal posterior urethra was skilfully demonstrated with US in 15 young boys with VUR. No statistically significant differences were found between tissue-harmonic and contrast-harmonic mode (p=0.102). Conclusions: Contrast-enhanced second-harmonic VUS is a sensitive and easy technique for the evaluation of VUR. A second-generation US contrast medium such as SonoVue, if available, should be the first choice as the dose required for one examination is much lower and consequently significant reduction of contrast agent cost is possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2a, b
Fig. 3a, b
Fig. 4a–c

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bosio M (1998) Cystosonography with echocontrast: a new imaging modality to detect vesicoureteric reflux in children. Pediatr Radiol 28:250–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Darge K, Troeger J, Duetting T, et al (1999) Reflux in young patients: comparison of voiding US of the bladder and retrovesical space with echo enhancement versus voiding cystourethrography for diagnosis. Radiology 210:201–207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mentzel HJ, Vogt S, Joan U, et al (2002) Voiding urosonography with ultrasonography contrast medium in children. Pediatr Nephrol 17:272–278

    Google Scholar 

  4. Farina R, Arena C, Pennisi F, et al (2000) Vesico-ureteral reflux: diagnosis and staging with voiding color Doppler US. Preliminary experience. Eur J Radiol 35:49–53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Haberlik A (1997) Detection of low-grade vesicoureteral reflux in children by color Doppler imaging mode. Pediatr Surg 12:38–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ascenti G, Chimenz R, Zimbaro G, et al (2000) Potential role of color-Doppler cystosonography with echocontrast in the screening and follow-up of vesicoureteral reflux. Acta Paediatr Scand 89:1336–1339

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Riccabona M (2002) Cystography in infants and children: a critical appraisal of the many forms with special regard to voiding cystourethrography. Eur Radiol 12:2910–2918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Novljan G, Kenig A, Rus R, et al (2003) Cyclic voiding urosonography in detecting vesicoureteral reflux in children. Pediatr Nephrol 18:992–995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Valentini AL, Salvaggio E, Manzoni C, et al (2001) Contrast-enhanced gray-scale and color Doppler voiding urosonography versus voiding cystourethrography in the diagnosis and grading of vesicoureteral reflux. J Clin Ultrasound 29:65–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Darge K, Ghods S, Zieger B, et al (2001) Reduction in voiding cystourethrographies after the introduction of contrast enhanced sonographic reflux diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol 31:790–795

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berrocal T, Gaya F, Arjonilla A, et al (2001) Vesicoureteral reflux: diagnosis and grading with echo-enhanced cystosonography versus voiding cystourethrography. Radiology 221:359–365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Uhl M, Kromeier J, Zimmerhackl LB, et al (2003) Simultaneous voiding cystourethrography and voiding urosonography. Acta Radiol 44:265–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Piaggio G, Degl’Innocenti ML, Toma P, et al (2003) Cystosonography and voiding cystourethrography in the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Nephrol 18:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kenda RB, Novljan G, Kenig A, et al (2000) Echo-enhanced ultrasound voiding cystography in children: a new approach. Pediatr Nephrol 14:297–300

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ascenti G, Zimbaro G, Mazziotti S, et al (2003) Vesicoureteral reflux: comparison between urosonography and radionuclide cystography. Pediatr Nephrol 18:768–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bosio M, Manzoni GA (2002) Detection of posterior urethral valves with voiding cystouretrosonography with echo contrast. J Urol 168:1711–1715

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Matè A, Bargiela A, Mosteiro S, et al (2003) Contrast ltrasound of the urethra in children. Eur Radiol 13:1534–1537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Talenti E, Piaggio G, De Filippi C, et al (2001) Il ruolo della cistosonografia nella diagnosi e nel follow-up delle uropatie malformative. Riv Ital Pediatr 27:290–296

    Google Scholar 

  19. Darge K, Zieger B, Rohrschneider W, et al (2001) Contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux in pediatric patients. AJR 177:1411–1415

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Darge K (2002) Diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux with ultrasonography. Pediatr Nephrol 17:52–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Spinazzi A (2001) Emerging clinical applications for contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 11(Suppl 3):E7–E12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakamura M, Wang Y, Shigeta K, et al (2002) Simultaneous voiding cystourethrography and voiding urosonography: an in vitro and in vivo study. Clin Radiol 57:846–849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Atala A, Ellsworth P, Share J, et al (1998) Comparison of sonicated albumin enhanced sonography to fluoroscopic and radionuclide voiding cystography for detecting vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 160:1820–1822

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lebowitz RL, Olbing H, Parkkulainen KV, et al (1985) International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Radiol 15:105–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Somes G (1983) McNemar test. In: Kotz S, Johnson N (eds) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. Wiley, New York, pp 361–363

  26. Mentzel HJ, Vogt S, Patzer L, et al (1999) Contrast-enhanced sonography of vesicoureteral reflux in children: preliminary results. AJR 173:737–740

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Correas JM, Bridal L, Lesavre A, et al (2001) Ultrasound contrast agents: properties, principles of actions, tolerance, and artefacts. Eur Radiol 11:1316–1328

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rizzatto G, Martegani A, Chersevani R, et al (2001) importance of staging of breast cancer and role of contrast ultrasound. Eur Radiol 11(Suppl 3):E47–E52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Messina, Via Giordano Bruno, 53, 98163, Messina, Italy

    Giorgio Ascenti, Giovanni Zimbaro, Silvio Mazziotti, Carmela Visalli & Emanuele Scribano

  2. Department of Paediatric Nephrology, 1st Paediatric Clinic, University of Messina, Messina, Italy

    Roberto Chimenz & Carmelo Fede

Authors
  1. Giorgio Ascenti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giovanni Zimbaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Silvio Mazziotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roberto Chimenz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Carmelo Fede
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Carmela Visalli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Emanuele Scribano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgio Ascenti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ascenti, G., Zimbaro, G., Mazziotti, S. et al. Harmonic US imaging of vesicoureteric reflux in children: usefulness of a second generation US contrast agent. Pediatr Radiol 34, 481–487 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-004-1190-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-004-1190-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation