Abstract
Stress inducement by physical exercise requires major cardiovascular adaptations in both adults and children to maintain an adequate perfusion of the body. As physical exercise causes a stress situation for the cardiovascular system, cardiovascular exercise stress tests are widely used in clinical practice to reveal subtle cardiovascular pathology in adult and childhood populations with cardiac and cardiovascular diseases. Recently, evidence from small studies suggests that the cardiovascular stress response can also be used within research settings to provide novel insights on subtle differences in cardiovascular health in non-diseased adults and children, as even among healthy populations an abnormal response to physical exercise is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. This narrative review is specifically focused on the possibilities of using the cardiovascular stress response to exercise combined with advanced imaging techniques in pediatric population-based studies focused on the early origins of cardiovascular diseases. We discuss the physiology of the cardiovascular stress response to exercise, the type of physical exercise used to induce the cardiovascular stress response in combination with advanced imaging techniques, the obtained measurements with advanced imaging techniques during the cardiovascular exercise stress test and their associations with cardiovascular health outcomes. Finally, we discuss the potential for cardiovascular exercise stress tests to use in pediatric population-based studies focused on the early origins of cardiovascular diseases.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cardiovascular diseases are a major public health problem worldwide [1]. Because of the large clinical impact that cardiovascular diseases have in adulthood, most research has focused on adult populations. Accumulating evidence suggests that cardiovascular diseases may at least partly originate in the earliest phase of life [2, 3]. Adverse exposures acting at different stages of fetal and early postnatal development, may lead to permanent adaptations in the structure, physiology and function of cardiovascular organ systems, predisposing to an increased risk of cardiovascular risk factors in childhood and cardiovascular disease in later life [4,5,6,7]. It is well-known that cardiovascular risk factors, such obesity and a higher blood pressure, often track from childhood into adulthood and are associated with cardiovascular diseases in later life [8, 9]. These effects are even stronger among individuals within an unhealthy lifestyle as adults.[10] Multiple observational studies have shown associations of adverse maternal, placental and fetal exposures during pregnancy with an impaired cardiovascular development in the offspring in both childhood and adulthood [2, 3, 11]. However, despite these observed associations, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear and it remains challenging to identify children at higher risk of cardiovascular diseases in later life who may especially benefit from early interventions.
Among pediatric populations, exercise testing of the cardiovascular system may be used as a novel method to detect subtle differences in cardiovascular development and to better identify children at risk of reduced cardiovascular health in later life. Physical exercise causes a stress situation for the cardiovascular system and requires important circulatory adaptations to maintain an adequate perfusion of the body. Already, cardiovascular exercise stress testing is widely used in clinical practice to reveal subtle pathology in adult and pediatric diseased populations [12,13,14,15]. In adult populations with cardiac abnormalities and cardiovascular diseases, an abnormal response of the cardiovascular system to exercise is associated with further deterioration of cardiovascular diseases and an increased risk of mortality [16, 17]. In pediatric populations, cardiovascular exercise testing is used especially in children with congenital heart diseases, but also with Kawasaki disease, arrhythmias, acquired valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy and hypertension to evaluate the severity of the condition, to assess the effects of pharmacological or surgical treatment or to induce and detect arrhythmias [15, 18, 19]. Also among these pediatric patients, an abnormal cardiovascular response to exercise is associated with poorer cardiovascular health outcomes, reduced exercise capacity and overall reduced quality of life [20]. Recently, evidence from small studies among pediatric populations without cardiovascular pathology suggests that the cardiovascular exercise stress test may provide important information on cardiovascular health in non-diseased pediatric populations [21, 22]. This underlines the importance of obtaining a better understanding of the potential use of the cardiovascular exercise stress test in pediatric populations in both research and clinical settings to identify children with an impaired cardiovascular health profile. In this narrative review, we discuss the potential for assessment of the cardiovascular stress response to exercise in pediatric population research. We discuss the physiological cardiovascular stress response, the use of different exercise methods and advanced imaging techniques to measure the cardiovascular stress response and the potential of using the cardiovascular stress response for future pediatric population research focused on the early origin of cardiovascular diseases. This review is partly based on two Medline searches (through PubMed) up to January 2019 in order to identify relevant studies focused on the use of isometric handgrip exercise to induce the cardiovascular stress response in children and its use in combination with cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (cMRI) scanning. The used search terms are described in Textbox 1.”
Cardiovascular Stress Response to Exercise
One of the most well-known stressors of the cardiovascular system is physical exercise, which leads to multiple adaptations in the cardiovascular system. An overview of the cardiovascular stress response is given in Fig. 1. During exercise, muscle activity increases the demand for oxygen. The response of the circulatory system is designed to match these higher oxygen requirements and thus higher blood flow in the exercising muscles. The cardiovascular response to exercise consists of a rise in heart rate, heart contractility and blood pressure [23]. Due to the mechanical skeletal muscle pump and exaggerated movement of the respiratory pump, exercise leads to a higher venous return, which will subsequently lead to an increased stroke volume. Both increases in heart rate and stroke volume lead to a higher cardiac output (CO). Because of the increase in CO and increasing vascular resistance in the abdominal viscera and non-active skeletal muscles, blood pressure will increase [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. There are several underlying autonomic mechanisms responsible for the sympathetic activation that causes the cardiovascular response on exercise, including corticohypothalamic pathways and peripheral reflexes [28, 31,32,33]. To enable these extensive physical adaptations to exercise, a healthy cardiovascular system is needed. Adaptations to physical exercise may not only be impaired in clinical populations with known cardiovascular or cardiac disease. Already, when subtle subclinical differences in cardiovascular health are present, this may lead to suboptimal adaptions of the cardiovascular system to the increased demands induced by exercise [34, 35]. Thus, measurement of the cardiovascular stress response to physical exercise may reveal subtle pathology that would have been undetectable at rest in research settings with presumably healthy pediatric populations.
Measurements of the Cardiovascular Stress Response in Pediatric Population Studies
Ideally, multiple cardiovascular measurements are obtained during rest, exercise and recovery to obtain an adequate evaluation of the response of the cardiovascular system to exercise. These measurements include heart rate response and recovery, oxygen saturation changes, blood pressure response and recovery and changes in stroke volume, ejection fraction and cardiac output.
Clearly, heart rate, oxygen saturation, electrocardiography and blood pressure response and recovery, are most easily obtained. Previous studies have mainly focused on these measurements to determine an abnormal cardiovascular response to physical exercise [15, 19, 36]. Abnormal cardiovascular response to exercise include an abnormal chronotropic response, abnormal heart rate recovery response, excessive rises in exercise blood pressure and exercise hypotension [23]. An abnormal chronotropic response is the inability of the heart rate to increase equivalent to the increasing demand of blood flow during exercise [37]. The inability to increase heart rate linearly in proportion to the physical effort, is common in both children and adults with congenital heart diseases and is associated with a poor prognosis[38,39,40]. An abnormal heart rate recovery response is usually defined as a decline in heart rate of ≤ 12 beats from peak exercise to one minute after cessation of the exercise test [23]. An excessive rise in exercise blood pressure is defined as a systolic blood pressure value exceeding the 95th percentile for exercise blood pressure [41, 42]. Exercise induced hypotension (EIH) can also occur, which is defined as a drop in systolic blood pressure during exercise below the pre-exercise value [43]. These impaired cardiovascular responses to exercise are strongly associated with cardiovascular events, diseases and mortality within adult populations, but smaller studies have also shown associations of an abnormal cardiovascular response to exercise with reduced cardiovascular health in children[12,13,14, 36, 44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51].
In addition to these common measures, there is an increasing awareness that advanced non-invasive cardiac imaging during exercise tests improves the value of the cardiovascular exercise tests as it allows detailed assessment of the structural and functional cardiac response to exercise [13, 52]. Non-invasive cardiac imaging modalities include echocardiography and the more advanced imaging modality of cardiac MRI scans. Exercise stress echocardiography is a commonly used imaging method to assess left ventricular function, wall motion, mitral valve function, pulmonary systolic pressure and diastolic function in response to exercise [42, 53,54,55,56]. In pediatric cardiology, stress echocardiography is mainly used in patients at risk for ischemic heart disease, such as children with Kawasaki disease, aortic stenosis, abnormal origin of the coronary arteries or children after coronary reimplantation [57, 58]. Echocardiography plays an important role in cardiac exercise testing due to its high imaging quality and ease of use. However, stress echocardiography has some important limitations. The dimensions of the right ventricle and stroke volume are challenging to assess. cMRI during exercise provides superior high resolution image quality and can produce 3D images of all the cardiac chambers, which allows for the most accurate and reproducible assessment of the cardiac response to exercise without geometric assumptions. cMRI also allows for assessment of the coronary artery system during exercise [59]. Although MRI has some limitations, such as the longer scan duration and higher costs, this more advanced imaging modality seems preferable in large population studies due to the superior reproducibility and detailed assessment of all cardiac chambers, which allows detection of small subclinical differences on a population level. Several small studies have used cMRI to obtain more detailed insight into cardiac adaptations to exercise and showed differences in cardiac response to exercise in diseased and non-diseased populations [60,61,62].
Thus, multiple measurements of the cardiovascular system are needed to fully address the cardiovascular stress response to exercise using both simple clinical measurements and advanced imaging techniques. Differences in these cardiovascular measurements are related to cardiovascular outcomes in later life in both adult and pediatric populations.
Exercise Methods for Detailed Cardiovascular Stress Response Assessment in Pediatric Research
There are multiple methods available to induce the cardiovascular response to exercise. In clinical practice, the cardiovascular stress response is often tested by the use of pharmacological stressors such as adenosine or dobutamine [23, 63]. However, this method cannot easily be used in pediatric research settings and does not entirely compare to the cardiovascular exercise response to everyday exercise as in contrast to exercise induced cardiovascular stress, pharmacological stressors do not lead to an increased venous return and subsequent preload[52].
There are several ways to induce a cardiovascular stress response by physical exercise in pediatric populations, which can be used in combination with advanced imaging techniques to obtain a detailed measurement of the cardiovascular stress response. These different approaches include the use of a treadmill, bicycle and isometric handgrip exercise, each with its own exercise protocol and advantages and disadvantages. Table 1 gives a short description of each of the three exercise methods and briefly discusses its advantages and disadvantages based on studies and actual experience with different exercise methods of the authors. By using a treadmill, the subject performs a running exercise protocol. Most studies use the Bruce Treadmill Protocol to achieve peak stress [64]. After the exercise, the subject has to take place in the MRI scanner as quickly as possible to assess the detailed cardiac response to exercise. When the subject takes place in the MRI, new localizer scans are needed for correct cardiac scanning. This results in a time delay between peak stress and image acquisition that may allow the subject’s cardiovascular system to recover [64]. Another option is the use of vacuum mattress positioning devices in order to position the subject identically to the position in which the subject was positioned during the scans before the exercise was performed. However, this method is time consuming, worsens the claustrophobic feeling of the small space inside the MRI scanner and has to be extremely precise which can be challenging in pediatric studies. Contrary to the treadmill exercise, both the bicycle and isometric handgrip exercise can be performed within the MRI scanner, reducing the delay between the exercise and assessment of the cardiac response to the exercise[52, 65]. A bicycle test is performed with the use of MRI compatible foot pedals at the foot end of the MRI table. Just before scanning, the exercise is performed to high exertion, after which the subject stops the exercise and the cMRI scan is conducted [64]. Small studies among healthy volunteers have used different exercise protocols to achieve peak stress measured by a minimal heart rate or percentage of the maximal oxygen uptake [65, 66]. Ultra-fast and real-time scanning is required to limit the breath holding time. A long breath hold is not feasible after intensive exercise, especially in children. Only isometric handgrip exercise can be performed during cMRI scanning. In this exercise protocol, the subject squeezes the device at a maximal force to determine the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). After a recovery period, the subject takes place inside the MRI scanner and takes the hand dynamometer in his or her dominant hand and squeezes the device at a certain percentage of the MVC for a certain period of time during the scan to induce the cardiovascular stress response to exercise [52]. This sustained handgrip method is eminently suited for pediatric research as this method is relatively easy to perform, does not lead to motion artifacts and can be performed during the scanning without the need for a real-time scan. Also, this exercise has the lowest costs in comparison with the other exercise methods.
Thus, based on its advantages and disadvantages, we consider especially in large pediatric population-based cohort studies, handgrip exercise among the most feasible physical stressors to induce the cardiovascular stress response to exercise, as it is easy to perform for children and allows as only method real-time scanning without losing image quality due to movement artifacts. Although handgrip exercise cannot be performed to maximum exertion, many studies showed that isometric exercise significantly raises heart rate and blood pressure in children [68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79].
Isometric Handgrip Exercise and the Effects on Heart Rate Variability and Blood Pressure in Pediatric Populations
The effects of isometric handgrip exercise on simple measurements of the cardiovascular stress response has been assessed by several studies in children both in the general population and in children at a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases. Table 2 summarizes the results and methods of the studies identified by our Medline search. In general pediatric populations, various handgrip exercise protocol haven been used. A study among 23 healthy children, aged 7–9 years examined the effects of 3 min at 30% MVC sustained handgrip on the cardiac index. The cardiac index was calculated by dividing the cardiac output (calculated as the product of heart rate and stroke volume) by body surface area (BSA). Stroke volume was calculated from the arterial pressure signal using the arterial pulse wave contour method. They found an increase of the cardiac index with 0.2L/min/m2 in response to isometric handgrip exercise [69]. A study among 217 children with a mean age of 13 years showed that a handgrip exercise of 2,5 min of sustained contraction at 30% MVC was associated with significant and clinically relevant changes in heart rate and blood pressure among boys and girls and that boys had greater systolic blood pressure responses than girls [73]. Among 162 healthy children with a mean age of 11 years it was shown that a sustained handgrip of 2 min at 60% MVC raises heart rate and blood pressure significantly [78]. Even handgrip exercises of only 30 s at 30% MVC and 4 min at 25% MVC have led to significant increases in blood pressure and heart rate in two other pediatric studies in 35 children with a mean age of 15 and 32 children with a mean age of 15 respectively [71, 77].
Studies are starting to emerge focused on the effects of well-known risk factors for an impaired childhood cardiovascular development on the cardiovascular stress response to exercise. Several studies suggest that a high childhood body mass index or a family history of hypertension may lead to alterations in the cardiovascular stress response to isometric handgrip exercise, although results are still inconsistent [51, 81, 82]. A study among 27 boys with a mean age of 11 years showed a lower increase in heart rate in response to isometric handgrip exercise in obese boys than in normal weight boys [68]. Similarly, a study in 20 obese children and 20 normal weight children aged 12–16 years old, found that obese children had a higher resting diastolic blood pressure, but a lower increase in diastolic blood pressure after an isometric handgrip exercise of 30% MVC until the point of fatigue [75]. A study among 14 obese children and 14 normal weight children divided into fit or unfit subgroups according to their performance of an exercise test showed that changes in cardiac output, cardiac index and stroke volume after a 3 min handgrip exercise at 30% MVC were higher in unfit than in fit obese children [72]. Contrary, a study among 166 healthy children with a mean age of 11, found a significant increase in heart rate and blood pressure after isometric handgrip exercise, but no differences among different BMI quintiles [83]. A cross-sectional study among 100 participants aged 17–24 years showed that among adolescents with a family history of primary hypertension, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean blood pressure increases to a 2 min isometric handgrip exercise at 30% MVC were much more pronounced compared to adolescent without a family history of hypertension [79]. This finding was in line with a study among 47 children aged 10 to 18 years which showed no difference in heart rates at baseline, but after an isometric handgrip of 4 min at 25% MVC heart rates were significantly higher in children with a family history of primary hypertension [74].
Thus, overall these relatively small studies suggest that isometric handgrip exercise at varying rates of intensity, induces alterations in the cardiovascular system. Most of these studies have used an exercise protocol that consisted a 3 min isometric handgrip exercise with a MVC at 30% [68,69,70, 72, 76, 77]. So far, small studies suggest that already subtle differences in heart rate and blood pressure response to isometric handgrip exercise may be present among higher risk pediatric populations. However, long-term follow-up studies focused on the associations of differences in cardiovascular stress response to isometric handgrip exercise in childhood with cardiovascular health outcomes in adulthood have not yet been performed.”
Isometric Handgrip Exercise and the Effects on Cardiac Adaptations Measured by Advanced Imaging Techniques
The use of isometric handgrip exercise to induce cardiac adaptations measured during cMRI has been studied in multiple adult studies, but not yet among pediatric populations. As no pediatric studies are yet available, we reviewed the evidence from adult studies to explore the effect of isometric handgrip exercise on cardiac adaptations as part of the cardiovascular stress response. Table 3 shows a descriptive overview of all studies found by our Medline search among adult populations assessing the cardiovascular stress response on isometric handgrip exercise during a MRI scan.
The majority of these studies examined the effects of a sustained handgrip at 30% MVC for 3–8 min during the MRI scanning. Even though isometric handgrip exercise protocols performed in the MRI varied, most studies showed that heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, rate pressure product (heart rate*systolic blood pressure), cardiac output and left ventricular ejection fraction significantly increased during exercise in line with observed responses among pediatric populations. A study in 53 healthy subjects (age 35 ± 17 years) used an isometric handgrip protocol of 6–9 min of sustained contraction at 30% MVC and showed that stroke volume and CO (L/min) increased. Overweight subjects showed less increase in heart rate and cardiac output [52]. This is in accordance with a study done in 75 healthy volunteers (age 38.8 ± 10.9 years) that examined the effects of biceps isometric exercise and found that BMI is associated with reduced augmentation of the CO [35]. Isometric handgrip exercise during cMRI can also be used to examine coronary endothelial function (CEF) [59, 61, 62, 67, 86, 87, 89,90,91, 93, 95, 104,105,106]. Healthy coronaries respond to exercise with a release of nitric oxide which lead to vasodilatation and an increase in coronary blood flow. Abnormal endothelial nitric oxide release leads to paradoxical vasoconstriction and reduced coronary blood flow which is an indicator of early atherosclerosis and a predictor of future disease [62, 67, 89, 105, 106]. A study in 14 healthy adults and 14 adult patients with non-obstructive mild coronary artery disease (< 30% maximum stenosis) examined the effects of isometric handgrip exercise of 4.5 min at 30% MVC on CEF. The coronary vasoreactivity (percentage change in coronary cross-sectional area) to isometric handgrip exercise was significantly higher in healthy subjects (13.5 ± 12.8%) than in those with mild coronary artery disease (− 2.2 ± 6.8%, p < 0.0001) [89].
Thus, these results show that isometric handgrip exercise can be performed successfully during cMRI in adult populations. An exercise protocol consisting a sustained handgrip at 30% MVC for 3–8 min results in significant hemodynamic changes that has the potential to reveal subtle functional cardiac differences in cMRI measurements. Cardiac adaptations as part of the cardiovascular stress response on handgrip exercise examined by cMRI have yet to be explored within pediatric populations.
Further Research
Accumulating evidence suggests that cardiovascular diseases may at least partly originate from early life onwards. However, the mechanisms underlying the observations that early life is a critical period for cardiovascular health in later life remain unclear. Also, early identification of children at risk of reduced cardiovascular health in adulthood remains challenging. In adults, the cardiovascular exercise stress test is already more commonly used in clinical and research settings to reveal subtle cardiovascular differences among individuals at risk for cardiovascular pathology. Based on this narrative review, we showed for the first time that a cardiovascular exercise stress test through a simple handgrip exercise may also have additional value as a marker of a suboptimal cardiovascular health profile in pediatric populations. Although many different handgrip exercise protocols exist, based on our narrative review it seems that a sustained handgrip at 30% MVC for 3–4 min is already sufficient to significantly raise blood pressure and heart rate in children and reveal differences in the cardiovascular stress response in children with cardiovascular risk factors, e.g., obesity as compared with healthy children. Thus, assessment of the cardiovascular stress response to relatively light handgrip exercise may be a novel method to already detect subtle differences in cardiovascular health from early childhood onwards. This method may provide novel insight into underlying mechanisms and may aid in earlier identification of children at higher risk of cardiovascular disease in later life. Yet, there remain important issues to be addressed.
First, thus far only small studies have examined the effects of isometric handgrip exercise on the cardiovascular stress response in non-diseased children. These studies have focused on heart rate and blood pressure variability in response to isometric handgrip exercise. None of these studies used advanced imaging techniques to assess cardiac adaptions in response to isometric handgrip exercise. Further research is needed to assess the detailed cardiovascular effects of isometric handgrip exercise in children using a combination of simple clinical measurements and advanced imaging techniques and to assess the feasibility of these measurements within large population studies from early childhood onwards. It further remains to be established whether isometric handgrip exercise is the most feasible method in pediatric population research to induce to cardiovascular stress response to exercise or whether a more high-intensity exercise method is needed to induce a clinically relevant cardiovascular stress response. Studies comparing different exercise methods in combination with detailed cardiovascular measurements in pediatric populations are needed.
Second, studies are needed to explore the associations of well-known cardiovascular risk factors with the cardiovascular stress response throughout childhood and adolescence into adulthood. Thus far, studies have only focused on obesity and family history of hypertension as adverse exposures leading to subclinical differences in the cardiovascular stress response. Even though these studies suggest small differences in cardiovascular stress response are present, these studies were small and show conflicting results. Further studies are needed to replicate these findings within larger pediatric populations. Also, studies are needed to explore the influence of other well-known cardiovascular risk factors, already from early fetal life onwards, on the cardiovascular stress response, such as maternal obesity during pregnancy, preterm birth and low birth weight.
Finally, long-term follow-up of participants is needed to obtain insight into the cardiovascular consequences later in life of an abnormal cardiovascular stress response in childhood and to explore whether the assessment of the cardiovascular stress response is beneficial for screening for individuals at a higher risk of cardiovascular disease in later life.
Conclusion
Cardiovascular diseases are a major public health problem with a large impact on morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. Accumulating evidence suggests that cardiovascular diseases may at least partly originate in the earliest phase of life. Adverse exposures in early life may lead to permanent adaptations in the cardiovascular system, predisposing to cardiovascular diseases in later life. The cardiovascular stress response to exercise may be a valuable additional measurement to detect subtle differences in cardiovascular health already from early childhood onwards. Based on small studies in pediatric and adult diseased and non-diseased populations, measurement of simple clinical measures including heart rate and blood pressure variability in combination with advanced imaging techniques to assess detailed cardiac adaptations in response to isometric handgrip exercise, can reveal subtle differences in cardiovascular development, which are associated with short-term and long-term cardiovascular health outcomes. Well-designed epidemiological studies from early childhood onwards are needed to assess the use and feasibility of measuring the cardiovascular stress response to exercise as a novel marker of cardiovascular health. These studies need to focus on the influence of well-known risk factors from early life onwards for cardiovascular disease on cardiovascular stress response in childhood and adolescence and assess whether differences in the cardiovascular stress response throughout childhood and adolescence are associated with cardiovascular health outcomes in later life.
References
Ritchey MD, Loustalot F, Bowman BA, Hong Y (2014) Trends in mortality rates by subtypes of heart disease in the United States, 2000–2010. JAMA 312(19):2037–2039
Barker DJ (1995) Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. BMJ 311(6998):171–174
Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Cooper C, Thornburg KL (2008) Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N Engl J Med 359(1):61–73
Gaillard R, Steegers EA, Tiemeier H, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW (2013) Placental vascular dysfunction, fetal and childhood growth, and cardiovascular development: the generation R study. Circulation 128(20):2202–2210
Toemen L, Jelic G, Kooijman MN, Gaillard R, Helbing WA, van der Lugt A et al (2019) Third trimester fetal cardiac blood flow and cardiac outcomes in school-age children assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Heart Assoc 8(16):e012821
Geelhoed JJ, Steegers EA, van Osch-Gevers L, Verburg BO, Hofman A, Witteman JC et al (2009) Cardiac structures track during the first 2 years of life and are associated with fetal growth and hemodynamics: the generation R study. Am Heart J 158(1):71–77
Kooijman MN, de Jonge LL, Steegers EA, van Osch-Gevers L, Verburg BO, Hofman A et al (2014) Third trimester fetal hemodynamics and cardiovascular outcomes in childhood: the generation R study. J Hypertens 32(6):1275–1282
Urbina EM, Khoury PR, Bazzano L, Burns TL, Daniels S, Dwyer T et al (2019) Relation of blood pressure in childhood to self-reported hypertension in adulthood. Hypertension 73(6):1224–1230
Wright CM, Parker L, Lamont D, Craft AW (2001) Implications of childhood obesity for adult health: findings from thousand families cohort study. BMJ 323(7324):1280–1284
Umer A, Kelley GA, Cottrell LE, Giacobbi P Jr, Innes KE, Lilly CL (2017) Childhood obesity and adult cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 17(1):683
Godfrey KM, Barker DJ (2001) Fetal programming and adult health. Public Health Nutr 4(2B):611–624
Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, Chaitman BR, Fletcher GF, Froelicher VF et al (2002) ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart association task force on practice guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 40(8):1531–1540
Paridon SM, Alpert BS, Boas SR, Cabrera ME, Caldarera LL, Daniels SR et al (2006) Clinical stress testing in the pediatric age group: a statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular disease in the young, committee on atherosclerosis, hypertension, and obesity in youth. Circulation 113(15):1905–1920
Kimball TR (2002) Pediatric stress echocardiography. Pediatr Cardiol 23(3):347–357
Washington RL, Bricker JT, Alpert BS, Daniels SR, Deckelbaum RJ, Fisher EA et al (1994) Guidelines for exercise testing in the pediatric age group. From the committee on atherosclerosis and hypertension in children, council on cardiovascular disease in the young, the American Heart association. Circulation 90(4):2166–2179
Schultz MG, La Gerche A, Sharman JE (2017) Blood pressure response to exercise and cardiovascular disease. Curr Hypertens Rep 19(11):89
Redfors B, Pibarot P, Gillam LD, Burkhoff D, Bax JJ, Lindman BR et al (2017) Stress testing in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Circulation 135(20):1956–1976
Stephens P, Jr., Paridon SM (2004) Exercise testing in pediatrics. Pediatr Clin North Am. 51(6):1569–87, viii.
Rhodes J, Ubeda Tikkanen A, Jenkins KJ (2010) Exercise testing and training in children with congenital heart disease. Circulation 122(19):1957–1967
Massin MM (2014) The role of exercise testing in pediatric cardiology. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 107(5):319–327
Bjelakovic L, Vukovic V, Jovic M, Bankovic S, Kostic T, Radovanovic D et al (2017) Heart rate recovery time in metabolically healthy and metabolically unhealthy obese children. Phys Sportsmed 45(4):438–442
Jankowski M, Niedzielska A, Brzezinski M, Drabik J (2015) Cardiorespiratory fitness in children: a simple screening test for population studies. Pediatr Cardiol 36(1):27–32
Fletcher GF, Ades PA, Kligfield P, Arena R, Balady GJ, Bittner VA et al (2013) Exercise standards for testing and training: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 128(8):873–934
Xie L, Liu B, Wang X, Mei M, Li M, Yu X et al (2017) Effects of different stresses on cardiac autonomic control and cardiovascular coupling. J Appl Physiol (1985) 122(3):435–445
Nobrega AC, O'Leary D, Silva BM, Marongiu E, Piepoli MF, Crisafulli A (2014) Neural regulation of cardiovascular response to exercise: role of central command and peripheral afferents. Biomed Res Int 2014:478965
Herd JA (1991) Cardiovascular response to stress. Physiol Rev 71(1):305–330
Thompson PD (2005) Exercise prescription and proscription for patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 112(15):2354–2363
Mohrman DE, Heller LJ (2018) Cardiovascular responses to physiological stresses. Cardiovascular physiology, 9th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New York
Boron WF, Boulpaep EL (2005) Medical physiology: a cellular and molecular approach. Elsevier Saunders, Amsterdam
Nobrega AC, Williamson JW, Garcia JA, Mitchell JH (1997) Mechanisms for increasing stroke volume during static exercise with fixed heart rate in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985) 83(3):712–717
Rowell LB, O’Leary DS (1990) Reflex control of the circulation during exercise: chemoreflexes and mechanoreflexes. J Appl Physiol. 69(2):407–418
Iellamo F, Pizzinelli P, Massaro M, Raimondi G, Peruzzi G, Legramante JM (1999) Muscle metaboreflex contribution to sinus node regulation during static exercise: insights from spectral analysis of heart rate variability. Circulation 100(1):27–32
Ludbrook J (1983) Reflex control of blood pressure during exercise. Annu Rev Physiol 45:155–168
Wang J, Ma H, Tong C, Zhang H, Lawlis GB, Li Y et al (2010) Overnutrition and maternal obesity in sheep pregnancy alter the JNK-IRS-1 signaling cascades and cardiac function in the fetal heart. FASEB J 24(6):2066–2076
Mortensen KH, Jones A, Steeden JA, Taylor AM, Muthurangu V (2016) Isometric stress in cardiovascular magnetic resonance-a simple and easily replicable method of assessing cardiovascular differences not apparent at rest. Eur Radiol 26(4):1009–1017
Stephens P (2017) Sudden cardiac death in the young: the value of exercise testing. Cardiol Young 27(S1):S10–S18
Brener SJ, Pashkow FJ, Harvey SA, Marwick TH, Thomas JD, Lauer MS (1995) Chronotropic response to exercise predicts angiographic severity in patients with suspected or stable coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 76(17):1228–1232
Diller GP, Dimopoulos K, Okonko D, Uebing A, Broberg CS, Babu-Narayan S et al (2006) Heart rate response during exercise predicts survival in adults with congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(6):1250–1256
Paridon SM, Mitchell PD, Colan SD, Williams RV, Blaufox A, Li JS et al (2008) A cross-sectional study of exercise performance during the first 2 decades of life after the Fontan operation. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(2):99–107
Norozi K, Wessel A, Alpers V, Arnhold JO, Binder L, Geyer S et al (2007) Chronotropic incompetence in adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease after cardiac surgery. J Cardiac Fail 13(4):263–268
Singh JP, Larson MG, Manolio TA, O'Donnell CJ, Lauer M, Evans JC et al (1999) Blood pressure response during treadmill testing as a risk factor for new-onset hypertension. Framingham Heart Study Circ 99(14):1831–1836
Mottram PM, Haluska B, Yuda S, Leano R, Marwick TH (2004) Patients with a hypertensive response to exercise have impaired systolic function without diastolic dysfunction or left ventricular hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol 43(5):848–853
Le VV, Mitiku T, Sungar G, Myers J, Froelicher V (2008) The blood pressure response to dynamic exercise testing: a systematic review. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 51(2):135–160
Gupta S, Rohatgi A, Ayers CR, Willis BL, Haskell WL, Khera A et al (2011) Cardiorespiratory fitness and classification of risk of cardiovascular disease mortality. Circulation 123(13):1377–1383
Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE (2002) Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med 346(11):793–801
Gulati M, Black HR, Shaw LJ, Arnsdorf MF, Merz CN, Lauer MS et al (2005) The prognostic value of a nomogram for exercise capacity in women. N Engl J Med 353(5):468–475
Wei M, Kampert JB, Barlow CE, Nichaman MZ, Gibbons LW, Paffenbarger RS Jr et al (1999) Relationship between low cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality in normal-weight, overweight, and obese men. JAMA 282(16):1547–1553
Blair SN, Kohl HW 3rd, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW (1989) Physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA 262(17):2395–2401
Ekelund LG, Haskell WL, Johnson JL, Whaley FS, Criqui MH, Sheps DS (1988) Physical fitness as a predictor of cardiovascular mortality in asymptomatic North American men. The lipid research clinics mortality follow-up study. N Engl J Med. 319(21):1379–1384
Kodama S, Saito K, Tanaka S, Maki M, Yachi Y, Asumi M et al (2009) Cardiorespiratory fitness as a quantitative predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in healthy men and women: a meta-analysis. JAMA 301(19):2024–2035
Treiber FA, Turner JR, Davis H, Thompson W, Levy M, Strong WB (1996) Young children's cardiovascular stress responses predict resting cardiovascular functioning 2 1/2 years later. J Cardiovasc Risk 3(1):95–100
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Dieringer MA, Fuchs K, Hezel F, Niendorf T, Schulz-Menger J (2013) Isometric handgrip exercise during cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: set-up and cardiovascular effects. J Magn Reson Imaging 37(6):1342–1350
Suzuki K, Akashi YJ (2017) Exercise stress echocardiography in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Echocardiogr 15(3):110–117
Lancellotti P, Dulgheru R, Go YY, Sugimoto T, Marchetta S, Oury C et al (2018) Stress echocardiography in patients with native valvular heart disease. Heart 104(10):807–813
Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA, Kuehl CA, Sawada SG, American Society of E (2007) American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20(9):1021–1041
Sicari R, Nihoyannopoulos P, Evangelista A, Kasprzak J, Lancellotti P, Poldermans D et al (2009) Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement—executive summary: European association of echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur Heart J 30(3):278–289
Cifra B, Dragulescu A, Border WL, Mertens L (2015) Stress echocardiography in paediatric cardiology. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16(10):1051–1059
Naik R, Kunselman A, Wackerle E, Johnson G, Cyran SE, Chowdhury D (2013) Stress echocardiography: a useful tool for children with aortic stenosis. Pediatr Cardiol 34(5):1237–1243
Hays AG, Hirsch GA, Kelle S, Gerstenblith G, Weiss RG, Stuber M (2010) Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery endothelial function in healthy subjects and in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(20):1657–1665
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Hennig P, Menza M, Dieringer MA, Foell D, Jung B et al (2016) Myocardial dysfunction in patients with aortic stenosis and hypertensive heart disease assessed by MR tissue phase mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 44(1):168–177
Hays AG, Iantorno M, Schar M, Mukherjee M, Stuber M, Gerstenblith G et al (2017) Local coronary wall eccentricity and endothelial function are closely related in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19(1):51
Deanfield JE, Halcox JP, Rabelink TJ (2007) Endothelial function and dysfunction: testing and clinical relevance. Circulation 115(10):1285–1295
Le TT, Huang W, Bryant JA, Cook SA, Chin CW (2017) Stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: current and future perspectives. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 15(3):181–189
Foster EL, Arnold JW, Jekic M, Bender JA, Balasubramanian V, Thavendiranathan P et al (2012) MR-compatible treadmill for exercise stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 67(3):880–889
Roest AA, Kunz P, Lamb HJ, Helbing WA, van der Wall EE, de Roos A (2001) Biventricular response to supine physical exercise in young adults assessed with ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 87(5):601–605
Gusso S, Salvador C, Hofman P, Cutfield W, Baldi JC, Taberner A et al (2012) Design and testing of an MRI-compatible cycle ergometer for non-invasive cardiac assessments during exercise. Biomed Eng Online 11:13
Hays AG, Iantorno M, Soleimanifard S, Steinberg A, Schar M, Gerstenblith G et al (2015) Coronary vasomotor responses to isometric handgrip exercise are primarily mediated by nitric oxide: a noninvasive MRI test of coronary endothelial function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 308(11):H1343–H1350
Dipla K, Zafeiridis A, Koidou I, Geladas N, Vrabas IS (2010) Altered hemodynamic regulation and reflex control during exercise and recovery in obese boys. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 299(6):H2090–H2096
Goulopoulou S, Fernhall B, Kanaley JA (2010) Developmental changes in hemodynamic responses and cardiovagal modulation during isometric handgrip exercise. Int J Pediatr. 2010:153780
Gumbiner CH, Gutgesell HP (1983) Response to isometric exercise in children and young adults with aortic regurgitation. Am Heart J 106(3):540–547
Laird WP, Fixler DE, Huffines FD (1979) Cardiovascular response to isometric exercise in normal adolescents. Circulation 59(4):651–654
Legantis CD, Nassis GP, Dipla K, Vrabas IS, Sidossis LS, Geladas ND (2012) Role of cardiorespiratory fitness and obesity on hemodynamic responses in children. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 52(3):311–318
Matthews KA, Manuck SB, Stoney CM, Rakaczky CJ, McCann BS, Saab PG et al (1988) Familial aggregation of blood pressure and heart rate responses during behavioral stress. Psychosom Med 50(4):341–352
Mehta SK, Super DM, Anderson RL, Harcar-Sevcik RA, Babjak M, Liu X et al (1996) Parental hypertension and cardiac alterations in normotensive children and adolescents. Am Heart J 131(1):81–88
Nageswari KS, Sharma R, Kohli DR (2007) Assessment of respiratory and sympathetic cardiovascular parameters in obese school children. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 51(3):235–243
Schieken RM, Clarke WR, Lauer RM (1983) The cardiovascular responses to exercise in children across the blood pressure distribution. The Muscatine study. Hypertension 5(1):71–78
Woehrle E, Harriss AB, Abbott KC, Moir ME, Balestrini CS, Fischer LK et al (2018) Concussion in adolescents impairs heart rate response to brief handgrip exercise. Clin J Sport Med. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000635
Ferrara LA, Mainenti G, Fasano ML, Marotta T, Borrelli R, Mancini M (1991) Cardiovascular response to mental stress and to handgrip in children. The role of physical activity. Jpn Heart J. 32(5):645–654
Garg R, Malhotra V, Dhar U, Tripathi Y (2013) The isometric handgrip exercise as a test for unmasking hypertension in the offsprings of hypertensive parents. J Clin Diagn Res 7(6):996–999
Matthews KA, Stoney CM (1988) Influences of sex and age on cardiovascular responses during stress. Psychosom Med 50(1):46–56
Simhaee D, Corriveau N, Gurm R, Geiger Z, Kline-Rogers E, Goldberg C et al (2013) Recovery heart rate: an indicator of cardiovascular risk among middle school children. Pediatr Cardiol 34(6):1431–1437
Laguna M, Aznar S, Lara MT, Lucia A, Ruiz JR (2013) Heart rate recovery is associated with obesity traits and related cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 23(10):995–1001
Aldo Ferrara L, Soro S, Mainenti G, Mancini M, Pisanti N, Borrelli R et al (1989) Body weight and cardiovascular response to sympathetic stimulation in childhood. Int J Obes 13(3):271–277
Al-Otaibi F, Wong SW, Shoemaker JK, Parrent AG, Mirsattari SM (2010) The cardioinhibitory responses of the right posterior insular cortex in an epileptic patient. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 88(6):390–397
Betim Paes Leme AM, Salemi VM, Weiss RG, Parga JR, Ianni BM, Mady C et al (2013) Exercise-induced decrease in myocardial high-energy phosphate metabolites in patients with Chagas heart disease. J Card Fail. 19(7):454–460
Bonanno G, Hays AG, Weiss RG, Schar M (2018) Self-gated golden angle spiral cine MRI for coronary endothelial function assessment. Magn Reson Med 80(2):560–570
Globits S, Sakuma H, Shimakawa A, Foo TK, Higgins CB (1997) Measurement of coronary blood flow velocity during handgrip exercise using breath-hold velocity encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 79(2):234–237
Haddock BT, Francis ST, Larsson HBW, Andersen UB (2018) Assessment of perfusion and oxygenation of the human renal cortex and medulla by quantitative MRI during handgrip exercise. J Am Soc Nephrol 29(10):2510–2517
Hays AG, Kelle S, Hirsch GA, Soleimanifard S, Yu J, Agarwal HK et al (2012) Regional coronary endothelial function is closely related to local early coronary atherosclerosis in patients with mild coronary artery disease: pilot study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5(3):341–348
Iantorno M, Hays AG, Schar M, Krishnaswamy R, Soleimanifard S, Steinberg A et al (2016) Simultaneous noninvasive assessment of systemic and coronary endothelial function. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 9(3):e003954
Iantorno M, Schar M, Soleimanifard S, Brown TT, Moore R, Barditch-Crovo P et al (2017) Coronary artery endothelial dysfunction is present in HIV-positive individuals without significant coronary artery disease. AIDS 31(9):1281–1289
Iantorno M, Soleimanifard S, Schar M, Brown TT, Bonanno G, Barditch-Crovo P et al (2018) Regional coronary endothelial dysfunction is related to the degree of local epicardial fat in people with HIV. Atherosclerosis 278:7–14
Leucker TM, Weiss RG, Schar M, Bonanno G, Mathews L, Jones SR et al (2018) Coronary endothelial dysfunction is associated with elevated serum PCSK9 levels in people with HIV independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. J Am Heart Assoc 7(19):e009996
Macey PM, Rieken NS, Ogren JA, Macey KE, Kumar R, Harper RM (2017) Sex differences in insular cortex gyri responses to a brief static handgrip challenge. Biol Sex Differ 8:13
Mathews L, Iantorno M, Schar M, Bonanno G, Gerstenblith G, Weiss RG et al (2017) Coronary endothelial function is better in healthy premenopausal women than in healthy older postmenopausal women and men. PLoS ONE 12(10):e0186448
Norton KN, Luchyshyn TA, Kevin SJ (2013) Evidence for a medial prefrontal cortex-hippocampal axis associated with heart rate control in conscious humans. Brain Res 1538:104–115
Norton KN, Badrov MB, Barron CC, Suskin N, Heinecke A, Shoemaker JK (2015) Coronary artery disease affects cortical circuitry associated with brain-heart integration during volitional exercise. J Neurophysiol 114(2):835–845
Rokamp KZ, Olesen ND, Larsson HB, Hansen AE, Seifert T, Nielsen HB et al (2014) Glycopyrrolate does not influence the visual or motor-induced increase in regional cerebral perfusion. Front Physiol 5:45
Verbree J, Bronzwaer A, van Buchem MA, Daemen M, van Lieshout JJ, van Osch M (2017) Middle cerebral artery diameter changes during rhythmic handgrip exercise in humans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 37(8):2921–2927
Williamson JW, McColl R, Mathews D (2003) Evidence for central command activation of the human insular cortex during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 94(5):1726–1734
Wong SW, Masse N, Kimmerly DS, Menon RS, Shoemaker JK (2007) Ventral medial prefrontal cortex and cardiovagal control in conscious humans. Neuroimage 35(2):698–708
Wood KN, Luchyshyn TA, Shoemaker JK (2017) High cardiorespiratory fitness in early to late middle age preserves the cortical circuitry associated with brain-heart integration during volitional exercise. J Neurophysiol 117(4):1831–1840
Zhang Y, San Emeterio Nateras O, Peng Q, Rosende CA, Duong TQ (2012) Blood flow MRI of the human retina/choroid during rest and isometric exercise. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 53(7):4299–4305
Yerly J, Ginami G, Nordio G, Coristine AJ, Coppo S, Monney P et al (2016) Coronary endothelial function assessment using self-gated cardiac cine MRI and k-t sparse SENSE. Magn Reson Med 76(5):1443–1454
Schachinger V, Britten MB, Zeiher AM (2000) Prognostic impact of coronary vasodilator dysfunction on adverse long-term outcome of coronary heart disease. Circulation 101(16):1899–1906
Suwaidi JA, Hamasaki S, Higano ST, Nishimura RA, Holmes DR Jr, Lerman A (2000) Long-term follow-up of patients with mild coronary artery disease and endothelial dysfunction. Circulation 101(9):948–954
Acknowledgements
Romy Gaillard received funding from the Dutch Heart Foundation (grant number 2017T013), the Dutch Diabetes Foundation (grant number 2017.81.002), and the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (NWO, ZonMW, grant number 543003109). Vincent Jaddoe received a grant from the European Research Council (Consolidator grant, ERC-2014-CoG-648916).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bongers-Karmaoui, M.N., Jaddoe, V.W.V., Roest, A.A.W. et al. The Cardiovascular Stress Response as Early Life Marker of Cardiovascular Health: Applications in Population-Based Pediatric Studies—A Narrative Review. Pediatr Cardiol 41, 1739–1755 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-020-02436-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-020-02436-6