Abstract
Ventricular assist device therapy is continuing to evolve in the practice of pediatric cardiac surgery. Although ECMO is still the most often applied mechanical support for infants and young children, a broader range of pulsatile, paracorporeal, as well as implantable ventricular assist devices are now available for pediatric application. A number of these innovative devices have been developed specifically for pediatric use with miniaturized pumps and optimized cannulas suitable for the entire age range of pediatric patients including neonates. Unlike ECMO, these devices can offer medium- to long-term support and have been successfully utilized as a bridge to transplant as well as a bridge to recovery. This review examines the different types of devices currently available, their clinical indications for use, future devices, and the current results of pediatric ventricular assist device therapy in the treatment of heart failure in the pediatric population.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashton RC Jr, et al. (1995) Left ventricular assist device options in pediatric patients. Asaio J 41:M277–M280
Baldwin T, Borovetz H, Duncan B, et al. (2006) The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Pediatric Circulatory Support Program. Circulation 113:147–155
Blume ED, et al. (2006) Outcomes of children bridged to heart transplant with ventricular assist devices: a multi-institutional study. Circulation
Cohen G, Permut L (2005) Decision making for mechanical cardiac assist in pediatric cardiac Surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Ann 8:41–50
Deiwick M, Hoffmeier A, Tjan T, et al. (2005) Heart failure in children—mechanical assistance. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53 (Supp 2):S135–S140
Deng MC, et al. (2004) Mechanical circulatory support device database of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: second annual report—2004. J Heart Lung Transplant 23:1027–1034
Duncan B (2005) Pediatric mechanical circulatory support. ASAIO J 51:ix–xiv
El-Banayosy NR, et al. (2003) Recovery of organ dysfunction during bridging to hear transplantation in children and adolescents. Int J Artif Organs 26:395–400
Fiser WP, et al. (2003) Pediatric arteriovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 22:770–777
Gajarski RJ, et al. (2003) Use of extracorporeal life support as a bridge to pediatric cardiac transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 22:28–34
Goldstein D (2003) Worldwide experience with the MicroMed Debakey ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplantation. Circulation 108(Suppl 2):272–277
Helman DN, et al. (2000) Implantable left ventricular assist devices can successfully bridge adolescent patients to transplant. J Heart Lung Transplant 19:121–126
Hetzer R, et al. (1998) Circulatory support with pneumatic paracorporeal ventricular assist device in infants and children. Ann Thorac Surg 66:1498–1506
Hetzen R, et al. (1999) Pulsatile pediatric ventricular assist devices: current results for bridge to transplantation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 2:157–176
Imamura M, Hale S, Johnson C, et al. (2005) The first successful DeBakey VAD child implantation as a bridge to transplant. ASAIO J 51:670–672
Ishino K, Loebe M, Uhemann F, et al. (1997) Circulatory support with paracorporeal pneumatic ventricular assist device (VAD) in infants and children. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 11:965–972
Kaczmarek I, Sachweh J, Groetzner et al. (2005) Mechanical circulatory support in pediatric patients with the MEDOS assist device. ASAIO J 51:498–500
Kirshbom PM, et al. (2002) Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in pediatric thoracic organ transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:130–136
Konertz W, et al. (1997) Clinical experience with the MEDOS HIA-VAD system in infants and children: a preliminary report. Ann Thorac surg 63:1138–1144
Korfer R, et al. (2000) Single-center experience with the Thoratec ventricular assist device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:596–600
Levi D, et al. (2002) Use of assist devices and ECMO to bridge pediatric patients with cardiomyopathy to transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 21:760–770
Martin J, et al. (1997) MEDOS HIA- VAD biventricular assist device for bridge to recovery in fulminant myocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg 63:1145–1146
McBride LR, et al. (1999) Clinical experience with 111 Thoratec ventricular assist devices. Ann Thorac Surg 67:1233–1239
Merkle F, Boettcher W, Stiller B, Hetzer R (2003) Pulsatile mechanical cardiac assistance in pediatric patients with the Berlin heart ventricular assist device. JECT 35:115–120
Nathan M, Baird C, Fynn-Thompson F, et al. (2006) Successful implantation of a Berlin Heart Biventricular Assist Device in a failing single ventricle. JTCVS (in press)
Noon G, Morley D, Irwin S, et al. (2001) Clinical experience with the Micromed DeBakey ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg 71:S133–S138
Padalino M, Ohye R, Chang A, et al. (2006) Bridge to transplant using the MicroMed Debakey ventricular assist device in a child with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Ann Thorac Surg 81:1118–1121
Reinhartz O, Hill D, Al-Khaldi A, et al. (2005) Thoratec ventricular assist devices in pediatric patients: update on clinical results. ASAIO J 51:501–503
Reinhartz O, Stiller B, Eilers R, Farrar D (2002) Current clinical status of pulsatile pediatric circulatory support. ASAIO J 48:455–459
Sadeghi AM, et al. (2000) Short-term bridge to transplant using the BVS 5000 in a 22-kg child. Ann Thorac Surg 70:2151–2153
Stiller B, Weng Y, Hubler M, et al. (2005) Pneumatic pulsatile ventricular assist devices in children under 1 year of age. Eur J cardiothorac Surg 28:234–239
Throckmorton A, Allaire P, Gutsegell H, et al. (2002) Pediatric circulatory support systems. ASAIO J 48:216–221
Thuys C, Mullaly R, Horton S (1998) Centrifugal ventricular assist in children under 6 kg. Eur J Cardiotriorac Surg 13:130–134
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fynn-Thompson, F., Almond, C. Pediatric Ventricular Assist Devices. Pediatr Cardiol 28, 149–155 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-006-1453-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-006-1453-6