Abstract
Ureterorenoscopy (URS) has revolutionized upper urinary tract stone therapy. However, the size of the working channel and the stone baskets limit irrigation flow as well as vision. This study determined further improvements of irrigation flow, deflection capacities and impairments of breaking resistance in a new 1.2 French (F) ultra-miniaturized basket. Irrigation measurements were performed in semirigid URS (semiURS, working channel 5F) and in flexible URS (flexURS, 3.6F) in 0°, 90° and 270° deflection with 1.2F, 1.8F, 1.9F and 2.2F baskets and compared with empty channel. Breaking strength of 1.2F, 1.8F and 1.9F baskets were evaluated using a material testing machine. Tested baskets affected irrigation in semiURS and flexURS (p < 0.05). Mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean) for semiURS flow rates counted 197.1 ± 2.0, 140.9 ± 1.6, 111.1 ± 1.5, 98.0 ± 1.3 and 77.1 ± 0.9 ml/min for empty channel, 1.2F, 1.8F, 1.9F and 2.2F baskets (p < 0.05). Using unbent flexURS flow rates of 44.2 ± 0.4, 20.4 ± 0.2, 5.9 ± 0.1, 5.4 ± 0.1 and 1.5 ± 0.1 ml/min for empty channel, 1.2F, 1.8F, 1.9F and 2.2F baskets, were observed (p < 0.05). The 1.2F versus 2.2F basket showed a 13.6-fold increase in flexURS irrigation (p < 0.05), while only the 2.2F basket reduced deflection by 20.3 %. The breaking strength decreased with a reduced basket size (1.2F: 6.4 ± 0.46 vs. 1.8F: 16.8 ± 2.79 vs. 1.9F: 32.2 ± 2.74 N, p < 0.05). Ultra-miniaturized baskets of 1.2F ensured a sufficient irrigation flow as needed for high quality vision in URS stone management. However, miniaturization of the 1.2F basket resulted in a reduced breaking strength compared with larger sized devices which in turn may hamper stone removal by an increased vulnerability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG (2010) Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol 12(2–3):e86–e96
Knoll T, Alken P (2011) Beyond ESWL: new concepts for definitive stone removal. World J Urol 29(6):703–704. doi:10.1007/s00345-011-0787-8
Knoll T (2009) S2 guidelines on diagnostic, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis: Part 1: diagnostic and therapy. Urologe A 48(8):917–924
Kruck S, Anastasiadis GA, Herrmann TRW, Walcher U, Abdelhafez MF, Nicklas AP, Hoelzle L, Schilling D, Bedke D, Stenzl A, Nagele U (2012) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy. World J Urol
Kruck S, Sonnleithner M, Hennenlotter J, Walcher U, Stenzl A, Herrmann TR, Nagele U (2011) Interventional stress in renal stone treatment. J Endourol 25(6):1069–1073
Nagele U, Horstmann M, Hennenlotter J, Walcher U, Kuczyk MA, Sievert KD, Stenzl A, Anastasiadis AG (2006) Size does matter: 1.5 Fr. stone baskets almost double irrigation flow during flexible ureteroscopy compared to 1.9 Fr. stone baskets. Urol Res 34(6):389–392. doi:10.1007/s00240-006-0071-3
Kruck S, Anastasiadis AG, Gakis G, Walcher U, Hennenlotter J, Merseburger AS, Stenzl A, Nagele U (2011) Flow matters: irrigation flow differs in flexible ureteroscopes of the newest generation. Urol Res 39(6):483–486. doi:10.1007/s00240-011-0373-y
Amend B, Muller O, Bedke J, Leichtle U, Nagele U, Kruck S, Stenzl A, Sievert KD (2012) Biomechanical proof of barbed sutures for the efficacy of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 26(5):540–544
Michel, Knoll T, Ptaschnyk T, Kohrmann KU, Alken P (2002) Flexible ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of lower pole calyx stones: influence of different lithotripsy probes and stone extraction tools on scope deflection and irrigation flow. Eur Urol 41(3):312–316 discussion 316–317
Sutera SP, Skalak R (1993) The history of poiseuille’s law, vol 25. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, USA
Haberman K, Ortiz-Alvarado O, Chotikawanich E, Monga M (2011) A dual-channel flexible ureteroscope: evaluation of deflection, flow, illumination, and optics. J Endourol 25(9):1411–1414. doi:10.1089/end.2010.0642
Abdelshehid C, Ahlering MT, Chou D, Park HK, Basillote J, Lee D, Kim I, Eichel L, Protsenko D, Wong B, McDougall E, Clayman RV (2005) Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics. J Urol 173(6):2017–2021
Boylu U, Oommen M, Thomas R, Lee BR (2009) In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes. J Urol 182(5):2347–2351. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.031
Magheli A, Semins MJ, Allaf ME, Matlaga BR (2012) Critical analysis of the miniaturized stone basket: effect on deflection and flow rate. J Endourol 26(3):275–277. doi:10.1089/end.2011.0166
Hendlin K, Lee C, Anderson JK, Monga M (2004) Radial dilation force of tipless and helical stone baskets. J Endourol 18(10):946–947
Monga M, Hendlin K, Lee C, Anderson JK (2004) Systematic evaluation of stone basket dimensions. Urology 63(6):1042–1044. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2003.12.030
Korman E, Hendlin K, Monga M (2011) Small-diameter nitinol stone baskets: radial dilation force and dynamics of opening. J Endourol 25(9):1537–1540. doi:10.1089/end.2010.0585
Conflict of interest
1.2F and 1.8F stone baskets were offered by an unrestricted educational grant from Urotech, Germany. The authors declare no other conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bedke, J., Leichtle, U., Lorenz, A. et al. 1.2 French stone retrieval baskets further enhance irrigation flow in flexible ureterorenoscopy. Urolithiasis 41, 153–157 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012-0540-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012-0540-9