Skip to main content

Stone Baskets and Forceps

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ureteroscopy

Abstract

Stone extraction devices are an important part of ureteroscopic stone extraction and laser lithotripsy. The instruments have evolved significantly as more advanced and miniaturized flexible ureteroscopes have been developed. Currently, tipless nitinol stone baskets are available from a number of manufacturers. The nitinol baskets do not affect the deflection of the flexible ureteroscope and can also be used with semirigid ureteroscopes. There is a reduction in the flow of irrigant with the use of stone extraction devices, but this is proportional to the size of the device. Nitinol baskets are safe for use in all parts of the collecting system and should be considered a standard first choice when a stone basket is used. Dormia helical and Segura flatwire baskets remain available commercially and may be useful in select cases but are not commonly used.

Antiretropulsion devices, as well as BackStop (Cook Urological, Bloomington, IN, USA) and basket retention of a stone during laser lithotripsy, can reduce the migration of ureteral stones to the kidney during ureteroscopic lithotripsy and help to avoid additional procedures. For the three devices available, some data is available showing safety, however further clinical studies are required to establish whether their routine use for ureteral stones is warranted and cost effective.

The most feared complication of the use of stone extraction devices is ureteral avulsion. The use of these devices and stone extraction should only be performed under direct vision, while observing the urothelium slide over the stone. If basket impaction occurs, no further traction should be applied to the basket. Laser can be applied to the stone or the basket itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Honey RJD’A. Working instruments. In: Smith AD, Badlani GH, Bagley DH, Clayman RV, Docimo SG, Jordan GH, Kavoussi LR, Lee BR, Lingeman JE, Preminger GM, Segura JW. Smith’s Textbook of Endourology. Hamilton, ON, Canada: BC Decker Inc.; 2007. p. 209–12.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Honey RJD’A. Assessment of a new tipless nitinol stone basket and comparison with an existing flat-wire basket. J Endourol. 1998;12(6):529–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Leone NT, Garcia-Roig M, Bagley DH. Changing trends in the use of ureteroscopic instruments from 1996 to 2008. J Endourol. 2010;24(3):361–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chenven ES, Bagley DH. Retrieval and releasing capabilities of stone basket designs in-vitro. J Endourol. 2005;19(2):204–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Dretler SP, Kahn RI, Lingeman JE, Macaluso Jr JN. Ureteral stones clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1997;158:191501921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Monga M, Hendlin K, Lee C, Anderson K. Systematic evaluation of stone basket dimensions. Urology. 2004;63:1042–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blew BDM, Dagnone AJ, Fazio LM, Pace KT, Honey RJD’A. Practical comparison of four nitinol stone baskets. J Endourol. 2007;21(6):655–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hendlin K, Lee C, Anderson JK, Monga M. Radial dilation force of tipless and helical stone baskets. J Endourol. 2004;18(10):946–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lukasewycz S, Skenazy J, Hoffman N, Kuskowski M, Hendlin K, Monga M. Comparison of nitinol tipless stone baskets in an in vitro calyceal model. J Urol. 2004;172:562–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bach T, Geavlete B, Herrmann TR, Gross AJ. Working tools in flexible ureterorenoscopy- influence on flow and deflection: What does matter? J Endourol. 2008;22(8):1639–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weiland D, Hendlin K, Canales BK, Lukasewycz S. Monga. Lateral deflection to release a stone: A simple method. J Endourol. 2007;21(10):1149–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Michel MS, Knoll T, Ptaschnyk T, Kohrmann KU, Alken P. Flexible ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of lower pole calyx stones: Influence of different lithotripsy probes and stone extraction tools on scope deflection and irrigation flow. Eur Urol. 2002;41(3):312–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eisner BH, Dretler SP. Use of the stone cone for prevention of calculus retropulsion during holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy: Case series and review of the literature. Urol Int. 2009;82:356–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Feng C, Ding Q, Jiang H, Gao P, Wen H, Gu B. Use of ntrap during ureteroscopic holmium-yag laser lithotripsy of upper ureteral calculi. Minim Invasive Ther. 2012;21(2):78–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wosnitzer M, Xavier K, Gupta M. Novel use of a ­ureteroscopic stone entrapment device to prevent antegrade stone migration during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2009;23(2):203–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chew BH, Gotto G, Teichman J, Paterson RF. The accordion: A new device to prevent stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2007;21 Suppl 1:A108.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rane A, Bradoo A, Rao P, Shivde S, Elhilali M, Anidjar M, et al. The use of a novel reverse thermosensitive polymer to prevent ureteral stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy: A randomized, controlled trial. J Urol. 2010;183:1417–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gallentine ML, Bishoff JT, Harmon WJ. The broken stone basket: Configuration and technique for removal. J Endourol. 2001;15(9):911–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chew BH, Jonat L, Paterson R, Teichman J. Anti-Retropulsion devices increase stone fragmentation efficiency with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2009;23 Suppl 1:A345.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nagele U, Horstmann M, Hennenlotter J, Walcher U, Kuczyk MA, Sievert KD, et al. Size does matter: 1.5 fr. Stone baskets almost double irrigation flow during flexible ureteroscopy compared to 1.9 fr. Stone baskets. Urol Res. 2006;34:389–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Watson G. The use of a sheathless basket via miniature ureteroscopes. Diagn Ther Endosc. 1995;1:177–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Landman J, Monga M, El-Gabry EA, Rehman J, Lee DI, Bhayani S, et al. Bare naked baskets: Ureteroscope deflection and flow characteristics with intact and disassembled ureteroscopic nitinol stone baskets. J Urol. 2002;167:2377–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bhayani SB, Monga M, Landman JL, Clayman RV. Bare naked baskets: Optimizing ureteroscopic stone extraction. Urology. 2002;60(1):147–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Alapont JM, Broseta E, Oliver F, Pontones JL, Boronat F, Jimenez-Cruz JF. Ureteral avulsion as a complication of ureteroscopy. Int Brazilian J Urol. 2003;29(1):18–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Elashry OM, Elgamasy AK, Sabaa MA, Abo-Elenien M, Eltatawy HH, El-Abd SA. Ureteroscopic management of lower ureteric calculi: A 15-year single-centre experience. Brit J Urol Int. 2008;102(8):1010–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ordon M, Schuler TD, Honey RJD’A. Ureteral avulsion during contemporary ureteroscopic stone management: “The scabbard avulsion”. J Endourol. 2011;25(8):1259–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Allen D, Hindley RG, Glass JM. Baskets in the kidney: An old problem in a new situation. J Endourol. 2003;17(7):495–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chotikawanich E, Korman E, Monga M. Complications of stone baskets: 14-Year review of the manufacturer and user facility device experience database. J Urol. 2011;185:179–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth T. Pace M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.C. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Foell, K., Honey, R.J.D., Pace, K.T. (2013). Stone Baskets and Forceps. In: Monga, M. (eds) Ureteroscopy. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-206-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-206-3_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-205-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-206-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics