Skip to main content
Log in

Reduced Selection for Codon Usage Bias in Drosophila miranda

  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biased codon usage in many species results from a balance among mutation, weak selection, and genetic drift. Here I show that selection to maintain biased codon usage is reduced in Drosophila miranda relative to its ancestor. Analyses of mutation patterns in noncoding DNA suggest that the extent of this reduction cannot be explained by changes in mutation bias or by biased gene conversion. Low levels of variability in D. miranda relative to its sibling species, D. pseudoobscura, suggest that it has a much smaller effective population size. Reduced codon usage bias in D. miranda may thus result from the reduced efficacy of selection against newly arising mutations to unpreferred codons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akashi H (1995) Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at “silent” sites in Drosophila DNA. Genetics 139:1067–1076

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akashi H, (1996) Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster. Genetics 144:1297–1307

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akashi H, Schaeffer SW (1997) Natural selection and the frequency distributions of “silent” DNA polymorphism in Drosophila. Genetics 146:295–307

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akashi H, Kliman RM, Eyre-Walker A (1998) Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila. Genetica 102–103:49–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Akashi H, Ko W, Piao S, et al. (2006) Molecular evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup: frequent parameter fluctuations on the timescale of molecular divergence. Genetics 172:1711–1726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andolfatto P (2005) Adaptive evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila. Nature 437:1149–1152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bachtrog D (2003) Protein evolution and codon usage bias on the neo-sex chromosomes of Drosophila miranda. Genetics 165:1221–1232

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bachtrog D, Andolfatto P (2006) Selection, recombination and demographic history in Drosophila miranda. Genetics 174:2045–2059

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolome C, Maside X, Yi S, Grant A, Charlesworth B (2005) Patterns of selection on synonymous and nonsynonymous variants in Drosophila miranda. Genetics 169:1495–1507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Begun DJ, Whitley P (2002) Molecular population genetics of Xdh and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila. Genetics 162:1725–1735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer M (1991) The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics 129:897–907

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galtier N, Piganeau G, Mouchiroud D, Duret L (2001) GC-content evolution in mammalian genomes:the biased gene conversion hypothesis. Genetics 159:907–911

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galtier N, Bazin E, Bierne N (2006) GC-biased segregation of noncoding polymorphisms in Drosophila. Genetics 172:221–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haddrill P, Charlesworth B, Halligan D, Andolfatto P (2005) Patterns of intron sequence evolution in Drosophila are dependent upon length and GC content. Genome Biol 6:R67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halligan D, Keightley P (2006) Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison. Genome Res 16:875–884

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halligan D, Eyre-Walker A, Andolfatto P, Keightley P (2004) Patterns of evolutionary constraints in intronic and intergenic DNA of Drosophila. Genome Res 14:273–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kawahara Y, Matsuo T, Nozawa M, et al. (2004) Comparative sequence analysis of a gene-dense region among closely related species of Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Genet Syst 79:351–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kern A, Begun D (2005) Patterns of polymorphism and divergence from noncoding sequences of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: evidence for nonequilibrium processes. Mol Biol Evol 22:51–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McVean GA, Vieira J (1999) The evolution of codon preferences in Drosophila: a maximum-likelihood approach to parameter estimation and hypothesis testing. J Mol Evol 49:63–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagylaki T (1983) Evolution of a finite population under gene conversion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:6278–6281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez J, Munté A, Rozas J, Segarra C, Aguadé M (2003) Nucleotide polymorphism in the RpII215 gene region of the insular species Drosophila guanche: reduced efficacy of weak selection on synonymous variation. Mol Biol Evol 20:1867–1875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards S, Liu Y, Bettencourt B, et al. (2005) Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura:chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution. Genome Res 15:1–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shields DC, Sharp PM, Higgins DG, Wright F (1988) “Silent” sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. Mol Biol Evol 5:704–716

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yi S, Bachtrog D, Charlesworth B (2003) A survey of chromosomal and nucleotide sequence variation in Drosophila miranda. Genetics 164:1369–1381

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Peter Andolfatto and Brian Charlesworth for comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by National Institutes of Health Grant GM076007 to D.B.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doris Bachtrog.

Additional information

[Reviewing Editor: Dr. Richard Kliman]

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1. Major codons identified in the D. pseudoobscura genome, following Akashi and Schaeffer (1997)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bachtrog, D. Reduced Selection for Codon Usage Bias in Drosophila miranda . J Mol Evol 64, 586–590 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-006-0257-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-006-0257-x

Keywords

Navigation