Abstract
Biased codon usage in many species results from a balance among mutation, weak selection, and genetic drift. Here I show that selection to maintain biased codon usage is reduced in Drosophila miranda relative to its ancestor. Analyses of mutation patterns in noncoding DNA suggest that the extent of this reduction cannot be explained by changes in mutation bias or by biased gene conversion. Low levels of variability in D. miranda relative to its sibling species, D. pseudoobscura, suggest that it has a much smaller effective population size. Reduced codon usage bias in D. miranda may thus result from the reduced efficacy of selection against newly arising mutations to unpreferred codons.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akashi H (1995) Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at “silent” sites in Drosophila DNA. Genetics 139:1067–1076
Akashi H, (1996) Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster. Genetics 144:1297–1307
Akashi H, Schaeffer SW (1997) Natural selection and the frequency distributions of “silent” DNA polymorphism in Drosophila. Genetics 146:295–307
Akashi H, Kliman RM, Eyre-Walker A (1998) Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila. Genetica 102–103:49–60
Akashi H, Ko W, Piao S, et al. (2006) Molecular evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup: frequent parameter fluctuations on the timescale of molecular divergence. Genetics 172:1711–1726
Andolfatto P (2005) Adaptive evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila. Nature 437:1149–1152
Bachtrog D (2003) Protein evolution and codon usage bias on the neo-sex chromosomes of Drosophila miranda. Genetics 165:1221–1232
Bachtrog D, Andolfatto P (2006) Selection, recombination and demographic history in Drosophila miranda. Genetics 174:2045–2059
Bartolome C, Maside X, Yi S, Grant A, Charlesworth B (2005) Patterns of selection on synonymous and nonsynonymous variants in Drosophila miranda. Genetics 169:1495–1507
Begun DJ, Whitley P (2002) Molecular population genetics of Xdh and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila. Genetics 162:1725–1735
Bulmer M (1991) The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics 129:897–907
Galtier N, Piganeau G, Mouchiroud D, Duret L (2001) GC-content evolution in mammalian genomes:the biased gene conversion hypothesis. Genetics 159:907–911
Galtier N, Bazin E, Bierne N (2006) GC-biased segregation of noncoding polymorphisms in Drosophila. Genetics 172:221–228
Haddrill P, Charlesworth B, Halligan D, Andolfatto P (2005) Patterns of intron sequence evolution in Drosophila are dependent upon length and GC content. Genome Biol 6:R67
Halligan D, Keightley P (2006) Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison. Genome Res 16:875–884
Halligan D, Eyre-Walker A, Andolfatto P, Keightley P (2004) Patterns of evolutionary constraints in intronic and intergenic DNA of Drosophila. Genome Res 14:273–279
Kawahara Y, Matsuo T, Nozawa M, et al. (2004) Comparative sequence analysis of a gene-dense region among closely related species of Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Genet Syst 79:351–359
Kern A, Begun D (2005) Patterns of polymorphism and divergence from noncoding sequences of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: evidence for nonequilibrium processes. Mol Biol Evol 22:51–62
McVean GA, Vieira J (1999) The evolution of codon preferences in Drosophila: a maximum-likelihood approach to parameter estimation and hypothesis testing. J Mol Evol 49:63–75
Nagylaki T (1983) Evolution of a finite population under gene conversion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:6278–6281
Pérez J, Munté A, Rozas J, Segarra C, Aguadé M (2003) Nucleotide polymorphism in the RpII215 gene region of the insular species Drosophila guanche: reduced efficacy of weak selection on synonymous variation. Mol Biol Evol 20:1867–1875
Richards S, Liu Y, Bettencourt B, et al. (2005) Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura:chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution. Genome Res 15:1–18
Shields DC, Sharp PM, Higgins DG, Wright F (1988) “Silent” sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. Mol Biol Evol 5:704–716
Yi S, Bachtrog D, Charlesworth B (2003) A survey of chromosomal and nucleotide sequence variation in Drosophila miranda. Genetics 164:1369–1381
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to Peter Andolfatto and Brian Charlesworth for comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by National Institutes of Health Grant GM076007 to D.B.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
[Reviewing Editor: Dr. Richard Kliman]
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bachtrog, D. Reduced Selection for Codon Usage Bias in Drosophila miranda . J Mol Evol 64, 586–590 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-006-0257-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-006-0257-x