Abstract
The transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap is the most common method of autogenous breast reconstruction. In high-risk patients, a reliable and bulky flap is needed to achieve breast symmetry and a mound together with durable satisfactory projection. The purpose of this study is to look into the use of contralateral zones of the pedicled TRAM flap to improve flap survival and to reduce the incidence of fat necrosis in order to achieve good cosmetic results. Seven obese large-breasted patients of cup size C and above who underwent primary breast reconstruction by the same surgeon are presented. In each case, all the four zones of the TRAM flap were used to achieve symmetry of the reconstruction. Patients had mastectomy with or without axillary clearance. The pedicled TRAM flap was elevated and the other side was raised as a perforator flap for microvascular augmentation. The perforator vascular pedicle was anastomosed to the thoracodorsal vessels in all cases. The anterior rectus sheath was repaired with a mesh in all cases. All the flaps were coned to achieve a good projection. All flaps survived with no complications or loss. All patients were satisfied with the outcome. One of our patients developed an abdominal bulge that was treated conservatively. Microvascular augmentation improved survival of zones III and IV of the TRAM flap, exemplified by flap survival and no incidence of fat necrosis. It is a good reconstructive tool to achieve breast volume, symmetry, and projection. In addition, it reduces the need of secondary breast surgery for the contralateral breast in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hartrampf CR, Scheflan M, Black PW (1982) Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 69(2):216–225 PMID: 6459602 [PubMed-indexed for MEDLINE]
Wagner DS, Michelow BJ, Hartrampf CR Jr (1991) Double-pedicle TRAM flap for unilateral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 88(6):987–997 PMID: 1835103 [PubMed-indexed for MEDLINE]
Hartrampf CR Jr, Bennett GK (1987) Autogenous tissue reconstruction in the mastectomy patient. A critical review of 300 patients. Ann Surg 205(5):508–519 PMID: 2953315 [PubMed-indexed for MEDLINE]
Ng RL, Youssef A, Kronowitz SJ, Lipa JE, Potochny J, Reece GP (2004) Technical variations of the bipedicled TRAM flap in unilateral breast reconstruction: effects of conventional versus microsurgical techniques of pedicle transfer on complications rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(2):374–384 discussion 385–388. PMID: 15277802 [PubMed-indexed for MEDLINE]
Clugston PA, Gingrass MK, Azurin D, Fisher J, Maxwell GP (2000) Ipsilateral pedicled TRAM flaps: the safer alternative? Plast Reconstr Surg 105(1):77–82 PMID: 10626973 [PubMed-indexed for MEDLINE]
Holm C, Mayr M, Höfter E, Ninkovic M (2006) Perfusion zones of the DIEP flap revisited: a clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(1):37–43 PMID: 16404245 [PubMed-indexed for MEDLINE]
Taylor GI, Palmer JH (1987) The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg 40(2):113–141 PMID: 3567445 [PubMed-indexed for MEDLINE]
Harashina T, Sone K, Inoue T, Fukuzumi S, Enomoto K (1987) Augmentation of circulation of pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps by microvascular surgery. Br J Plast Surg 40(4):367–370 PMID: 2957016 [PubMed-indexed for MEDLINE]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Louri, N., Tan, BK., Por, YC. et al. The augmented TRAM flap: a technique for the large-breasted patients. Eur J Plast Surg 32, 223–227 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-009-0341-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-009-0341-8